Search Helium

Home > Relationships & Family > Marriage & Divorce > Marriage > Tips for Marital Happiness

Should couples live together before getting married?

Results so far:

Yes
67% 2634 votes Total: 3956 votes
No
33% 1322 votes

Yes

by Yvette Durham

Created on: January 17, 2008

These days, the vast majority of couples live together before marriage. And with good reason. At least from personal experience I know the old saying, 'you don't really know someone until you live with them,' is indeed true.

Speaking from my perspective, I have lived with three men in the past (my husband excepted). All of them I deemed successful relationships and two of them were serious with an eventual view to marriage. But within 6 months of living together, they had all turned sour and rental contracts were not extended. I or they moved out and on, the relationship irrevocably at an end.

It is irrelevant whether it were them or me who was impossible to live with (although I'd naturally argue it was them- I had a way of picking a bad egg)! What is relevant is why it went wrong once we started living together, for we'd had happy, long-term relationships before moving in together. Setting up home together is a big commitment, often as a pre-text to further commitment such as marriage or children. Therefore after taking this big step, the psychological implications on the couple can change. In short, they get comfortable. Perhaps he stops presenting her with a surprise bunch of flowers ever so often, ceases to take her to their favorite Italian restaurant, makes no effort to tell her how beautiful she looks any more. Maybe he doesn't think she is that beautiful anymore, maybe she doesn't make such an effort now that they live together- I mean, she can't always wonder around their apartment with a full-face on and those sexy, but oh-too-tight skinny jeans. And then of course all the annoying little habits start to come into play that they didn't know their partner even had before moving in together. The persistence of these irritating habits can escalate into overall resentment between the couple. On getting up for work, he insists on waking the whole apartment block up with his stomping around at 5am, singing in the shower and slamming kitchen cupboards closed whilst preparing breakfast. He leaves his clothes all over the floor for her to pick up, doesn't lift a finger when it comes to chores and she feels completely taken for granted. She, on the other hand, has changed almost beyond recognition! Gone is the carefree, free-spirited, excitable girl who was more like a best friend than a girlfriend. A nagging mother is closer to the mark.

Its real life now, not the glamorous charade that some couples indulge in before commitment. And many couples don't get along with this reality so well. Nope, they much preferred the fantasy of how living together was going to be- endless, on-tap love-making, cozy candlelit evening meals, the excitement of knowing that at the end of the working day they would be returning to the expectant arms of their loved-one.

I'm not saying that this is not a reality for at least a while, but such a state of unperturbed bliss can never last. Its how the relationship adapts when it ends that separates the failed from the successful. Too many relationships would not withstand this first test of living together. Thankfully they have taken commitment slowly- they are not married with a joint-mortgage and can therefore simply walk away from each other and put it down to experience.

But what if they had, in my mind, taken the foolish step of making a life-long commitment, probably under the sight of God before trying and testing the relationship' and moving in together first? They live together for six months with problems mounting- he doesn't pay the bills on time, he has taken to verbally abusing her with hurtful taunts, she's a terrible cook (he's always escaping back to mum's home-cooking), she just seems incapable of performing the most simple of household tasks properly. Their once perfect relationship is not so strong and is only getting worse. They haven't the luxury of just going their separate ways if things get too bad, they are married, they have promised to stick together for richer for poorer, for better for worse. But there is no better, or richer. Everything is worse and marriage is not something you can absent-mindedly abandon, it has to be worked on- even if there is just no desire to anymore.

Living together first and weathering all the potential problems is a win-win situation, a responsible choice. If it works out, great, marriage is on the cards but if it doesn't, it is no serious matter, there is no ugly divorce to endure, no quashed dreams to lament. It is one less failed marriage statistic to read about in the paper.

For none of us want to loose our faith in the sanctity of marriage; lets therefore take all the precautions possible before making that lifelong commitment and do all we can to ensure the relationship is for keeps.
ite your article here

Learn more about this author, Yvette Durham.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.

No

by Kelly Ann Griffin

Created on: February 27, 2008

In today's culture, marriage is considered a "love it or leave it" status; when the love runs out, we can leave. A 2002 report from the U.S. Census Bureau stated that "The National Center for Health Statistics recently released a report which found that 43 percent of first marriages end in separation or divorce within 15 years." Loyalty is a profound, yet absent concept in the twenty-first century, as couples are now tip-toeing around each other with the attitude of "don't blow it, buster" secreting out to one another. The sure-fire fix for such a sentiment has become the test-drive prelude to marriage. Drive around the potential spouse, and make sure he/she runs well before buying. This "move-in before marriage motto" is gaining much popularity and fan-fare in today's society, but such a contractual motto stems from the wrong idea of marriage. Marriage is a lifelong commitment, not a contract. When a man and woman decide to marry, their decision should be taken seriously by all parties involved; no test-drive is needed, for marriage is a covenant that says, "I will love you even when you have a flat-tire, need an oil change, or completely stop running." Why such loyalty? Marriage is based upon an unconditional love, established first by a God who shows the same love toward us oftentimes wretches.

In a sociological view, many studies suggest that living together before marriage is a bad idea. Despite what society is screaming at couples concerning the benefits of cohabitation, a published Columbia University study found that a mere 26 percent of women and 19 percent of men surveyed eventually married their cohabitant. On average, a person who decides to live together before the "I do's" will never reach the altar, and eventually will move onto new partners. Furthermore, those who do end up tying the knot after living together tend to have a greater divorce rate than those who did not previously cohabitate; The National Survey of Families and Households released that "unions begun by cohabitation are almost twice as likely to dissolve within 10 years compared to all first marriages: 57% to 30%." If living together before marriage is an adequate test drive, than where is the error in these above-mentioned reports? Cohabitants should seemingly be almost divorce-free. Dr. William Harley, writer of the best-selling book, "His Needs, Her Needs: Building an Affair-Proof Marriage," explicitly explains that:

"[Marriage] is an agreement that you will take care of each other for life, regardless of life's ups and downs... But the commitment of living together isn't like that at all. It is simply a month-to-month rental agreement. As long as you behave yourself and keep me happy, I'll stick around. Habits are hard to break, and couples that live together before marriage get into the habit of following their month-to-month rental agreement. In fact, they often decide to marry, not because they are willing to make a lifetime commitment to each other, but because the arrangement has worked out so well that they can't imagine breaking their lease, so to speak. They say the words of the marital agreement, but they still have the terms of their rental agreement in mind."

The couple who has not cohabitated before marriage often does not have such a mindset and contrarily enters the marriage with a permanent perspective. And, with such a perspective, the couple's actions and habits toward one another frequently become that of acceptance and understanding. Fear of commitment is erased from the scene, as commitment is already established legally by a pretty piece of signed and stamped paper from the state government.

Yet, those who do not cohabitate before marriage do not automatically have problem-free marriages; many variables emerge when two people commit to one another in the marriage relationship. In Ephesians 5:31-32, it reads "For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh. This is a profound mystery, but I am talking about Christ and the church." Here, the Apostle Paul is explaining two theological truths. First, a man should leave his parents upon marriage, or in today's language, not be already cohabitating and united sexually with his bride before the wedding day/night. Secondly, to the Christian believer, marriage is far more significant than our culture deems it. Paul reveals that the husband-wife relationship is deeply symbolic and representative of the relationship that Christ has with his church. John Newton's widely recognized hymn, "Amazing Grace," contains the lesser known stanza, "The Lord has promised good to me, His word my hope secures. He will my shield and portion be, as long as life endures." When my husband and I married, we had this hymn sung as we lighted the unity candle. To us, the symbolization of the candles being lit into one, signified a lasting relationship of us, as now one-flesh, and most importantly, of being one with Christ "as long as life endures." The Lord will never turn his back on us, he didn't propose a trial commitment to us when he saved us, but instead he remains our savior despite any hardship and any derision on our part.

Should one cohabitate? It seems logical to test the waters before diving in deep. However, as a nanny cannot fully appreciate and understand parenthood until she has her own children, one will not appreciate marriage, until the status is actually achieved. Marriage is not an act of convenience, excuse for a fancy social gathering, or a legislation that can eventually be amended and disavowed. Marriage is not for those afraid of vulnerability. Marriage is for the brave pair that is willing to get their hands dirty in the mess that people often conjure. Despite the ugly and unhappy times that will certainly roll in, those that step up to the altar with a dedicated stance, vowing a slogan of "give me your best shot life, but we're going all the way," those are the embodiment of true, faithful marriage. And that is a precious love.

Learn more about this author, Kelly Ann Griffin.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.


CONNECT WITH US

Read
our blog
Helum for writers

Write and get published
Share with other writers
Polish your freelancing skills

Join our active writing community
Helium Content Source for Publishers

Quality articles from proven freelancers
Exclusive rights, fast turnaround
Brand engagement, business blogging -- our writers do it all

Get custom content today!

INFORMATION


Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA