Home > Politics, News & Issues > US Law & Justice > Justice System
Results so far:
| Yes | 46% | 626 votes | Total: 1368 votes | |
| No | 54% | 742 votes |
Yes
Created on: June 19, 2007
Let's all think about what non-violent means first. Non-violent crimes means that the crimes committed were not physically harming, or in any way, violent. However, this does not mean the crimes would not INDIRECTLY cause physical harm to a person.
For example, a CEO of a major corporation commits money fraud, and steals millions of dollars from hard working employees. They don't get paid because the company goes bankrupt. These people don't get money, their retirement funds disappear, and their lives are in disarray. Families without money can't afford food, and suddenly they can't pay for medical bills. So now this man that caused this to happen to hundreds or thousands of families gets off with no jail time, just a hefty fine? Absolutely not. Anyone in the position of the bankrupt family would demand and want the CEO to be sentenced to jail.
Simple crimes such as burglary or vandalism should be enforced with jail time so it prevents re-occurrence. Some people say it would not affect crime rates. Let's think from the criminal's point of view. Commit vandalism and possibly get a one-hundred dollar fine, or commit vandalism and possibly get jail time? Obviously crime rates would decrease substantially if jail time was put into effect. The United States' crime rate is increasing, so why not fight against it?
Our system of law has loop holes around every corner, and these criminals know that when they break the law, they can get off easily. Things like theft are not treated as seriously as they should be. You steal something, and get a fine. That is it. Our economy would function much better without all of these minor issues interfering.
Enforcing non-violent crimes with jail time is critical to preventing repetitive occurrence of those crimes. Society would function much better without having to worry about those types of things. Not to mention the police wouldn't have to be working so hard against those types of crimes, and would be focused more on the violent ones. These non-violent crimes cause countless problems in the United States today, and including jail time with these types of crimes would effectively reduce the amount of times they appear.
Learn more about this author, Mr. Smith.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
No
Created on: May 30, 2007 Last Updated: November 18, 2011
Non-violent crimes should be punished in non-violent retribution. Studies back up the reasons why.
1. Recidivism
Non-violent criminals have a recidivism rate of only 3% according to the Department of Justice. Once caught, these criminals do not repeat their crimes. These rates take into consideration that more than half of non-violent criminals are not sentenced to jail time.
2. Cost
The cost of housing a non-violent criminal in a penal institution exceeds $82,000.00 per year according to Institute's study on prison spending. This amount is added to the average cost of $28,000.00 per charge to prosecute according to the Attorney General's Office. During incarceration, the offender generates no tax money to recoup the expenses of housing or prosecution.
3. Restitution
Non-violent criminals are routinely sentenced to pay restitution for their crimes. This restitution is not made until after the prison terms are served. This prolongs the period of time the victim remains penalized.
4. Taxes
Electronic monitoring of non-violent offenders costs less than $10,000.00 per year. During the monitoring period, the offender is required to make restitution and to participate in work-release programs. The offender must pay taxes on all income received through the program, thus defraying some of the costs of punishment. Alternatively, placing non-violent offenders on probation is less than one-twentieth the cost of imprisonment.1
5. Economic Impact
Typical non-violent offenses are considered "white collar crime" and include malfeasance, misappropriation, identity theft and embezzlement. These forms of theft have long-lasting repercussions on the economy at large until such time as restitution is complete.2 Crimes of this nature affect insurance rates, stock values and interest rates which, in turn, penalize the general public.
6. Fines
Fines associated with non-violent crimes are inadequate to recoup the losses of the prosecutors and the courts. When prison sentences are imposed, these fines cannot be paid until after the incarceration is complete.
7. Criminal Investigations
Investigations into non-violent crime require more technologically advanced equipment, many man hours and extend over months. The lost man hours impede investigation into violent crime. This leads to a disproportionate amount of violent crime not being investigated in areas where non-violent crime is more prevalent, such as large metropolitan cities and financial centers.
8. Community Service
Community services hours are only sentenced in approximately 20% of non-violent cases. If this statistic would rise to the amount of 80%, more restitution would be granted to the public at large for crimes that are more far-reaching than just the named victim.
Non-violent offenders should be forced to work as part of the society they have offended until such time as they have made full restitution to their victims, their communities and the offices taxed with the investigation, prosecution and monitoring of their crimes and punishment.
1 Pew Center on the States, One in 31: The Long Reach of American Corrections (Washington, DC: The Pew Charitable Trusts, March 2009).
2 Piehl, Anne M., Bert Useem and John J. DiIulio, Jr., Right-Sizing Justice: A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Imprisonment in Three States (New York: Manhattan Institute, Sept. 1999)
Learn more about this author, Ann Marie Dwyer.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.