Home > Politics, News & Issues > US Politics > Political Issues
Results so far:
| Yes | 61% | 905 votes | Total: 1476 votes | |
| No | 39% | 571 votes |
Yes
Created on: July 05, 2007 Last Updated: July 24, 2009
It occurs to me that smokers should view cigarette taxes as a "tough love" approach from our government. When smokers ask themselves if high taxes on cigarettes are fair, perhaps they should view the issue from another perspective. It could be that high taxes are our government's way of saying, "we love you enough to make it difficult for you to kill yourself."
This year, on April 1, 2009, the largest tax ever was levied on a single pack of cigarettes by a whopping increase of 62 cents, up from 39 cents. To counter the anticipated loss in revenue, cigarette companies have also raised their prices. This year's taxes will be used to fund children's health care programs, a part of President Obama's health care overall plan, and they are projected to raise $33 billion over 4.5 years.
I doubt that this is much of a solace to smokers who already feel unfairly stressed economically. Yet the realities of their habit-of-choice is a health care system burdened with people in varying stages of decline and who require expensive medical care on our already over-burdened system. While it may be easy for a smoker to live in denial about the true realities of their habit, it's not so easy for the millions of non-smokers left to pay higher health care premiums resulting from an addictive habit that is not theirs.
Our government should not pander to this addiction. Perhaps the tax on cigarettes won't seem so economically burdensome if the time ever comes when smoking comes under harsher restrictions. It's already banned from public buildings and some communities even ban it in public parks. This is a dangerous habit not just for the smoker who exercises their right to smoke, but even worse for non-smokers whose right to clean air is taken away if they are forced to share common space with a smoker.
It is true that our health care system is over-burdened from a multitude of bad habits, like food addictions that cause obesity and alcohol related problems. Cigarette smokers are right to believe that any type of bad habit or addiction that causes health problems should also be taxed equally. Toward this end, there are taxes under consideration now that may equalize the taxation playing field and help smokers feel they are being treated more fairly.
It is estimated that 20 percent of America's population still smokes cigarettes. Another estimate projects that up to five percent of this group will stop smoking because of the recent tax hikes this year. The Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids also predicts a drop of up to seven percent among young tobacco users.
It if takes higher and higher taxes to finally motivate hardcore smokers to cast off a habit that's killing them and draining our health care system of important resources, then I believe even higher taxes may well be justified in the future.
Statistic Souce: http://www.mahalo.com/cigarette-tax
Aren'tNewsday.com: Smokers hit with $0.62 cigarette tax... (March 30, 2009)
Learn more about this author, Diane Quinn .
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
No
Created on: August 27, 2007 Last Updated: August 14, 2009
We might not be promised fairness in this life, but by America's founding documents, we are promised justice for all. The real question is this: Is it ever just for any government to arbitrarily select products and punish consumers with higher taxes? Of course it is not. Even non-smokers can agree that high taxes on cigarettes are unjust. If you vote in favor of higher taxes on cigarettes simply because you disapprove of smoking, you are really casting your vote in favor of Big Government.
Slippery Slope
What if the government just randomly decided to tax milk, or eggs, or Big Macs at higher rates? What if Uncle Sam decided that since Whoppers make people fat, then there should be a high tax on them to discourage obesity. Or what if the government decided that since trucks aren't "green" enough, owners should pay higher taxes? Essentially, when the government decides to penalize any demographic with higher taxes in an attempt to control the lifestyles of the citizens, it is engaging in the early stages of socialism. Opening the door to socialism even a crack is very dangerous ground, and can land us on a very slippery slope of unjust government control.
Big Brother
It's no surprise that the government doesn't like it when its citizens engage in activities that are beyond its control. For example, drugs like marijuana are not illegal because they are unhealthy, they are illegal because the government knows that it could never monitor and tax all of the exchanges of the drug. Uncle Sam wants his piece of the pie, and if the product is one that customers can easily grow in their own back yard, well, he doesn't like that very much. If Uncle Sam can't have any, no one gets any. The circumstances are similar with cigarettes. The government especially despises people who grow their own tobacco and roll their own cigarettes. Therefore, the rest of smokers have to pick up the slack and pay the taxes that home growers are avoiding.
Here is the bottom line: It is the responsibility of every citizen to think clearly and logically about the votes they cast. No one should ever vote merely in favor of his pocket book, or the false nobility of the government claiming that higher taxes are "for the children." If we allow the government to take an inch, it will go all the way and take the whole mile. Nip socialism in the bud while you can, or you just might find your favorite product next in line on Uncle Sam's greedy hit list.
Learn more about this author, Sara W..
Click here to send this author comments or questions.