Get a Widget for this title
RSS FeedShould a woman have the right to choose abortion?
Results so far:
| Yes | 71% | 3973 votes | Total: 5622 votes | |
| No | 29% | 1649 votes |
Yes
Write now
Print
Invite a writer™
Add to FavoritesI believe a woman should have the right to choose abortion rather than give birth to her child. I am one of the early members of NOW (National Organization for Women) so you understand my concern for women's rights. I do not however necessarily believe nor defend the usual reason for a woman's right to an abortion, i.e. it is her body and she has a right to do as she pleases with it. No, I do not believe this to be true in the case of a pregnancy. You see, when a woman engages in sex with a man it is a mutual agreement and acknowledgement that a child may be created by both of them, and they are both therefore responsible for this child. So in the case of pregnancy the woman has offered her body as a nursery for the child belonging to both she the mother and the man/father. In that case she only has a right to an abortion if the man agrees. She was not alone in getting pregnant and I believe she can not morally and ethically make the decision to end the pregnancy alone. This is the unspoken agreement made between a male and a female when they agree to the act of possible creation. That said I will get to my personal reasons for understanding the need for abortion and a woman's right to be have the procedure legally and safely made available to her.
I personally hate abortion. The only thing I hate more is seeing an unwanted and unloved child brought into this mean world. Much better I believe to choose abortion and send those dear souls back to God until they find parents who will love them. If those who are so vehemently in opposition to abortion would put their heart where their hateful mouths are they would adopt one of those unwanted and unloved children who were not aborted, but allowed to be born and then abandoned.
Our foster care programs are overflowing with these children. Unwanted from the beginning and unwanted thru out their life in far too many cases. Most state foster care programs discharge a child on their 18th. birthday no matter what time of year this birthday falls on. So some foster children after being shuttled from home to home most of their lives and never staying long enough to form a bond of love with a foster parent, or anyone else, often find themselves out on the street without even a high school diploma. There have been cases of tossed out foster children living on the streets and yet continuing to go to school. Recently the news papers reported on a young man who finished his senior year in high school by actually living in the school. He managed to get by with this for several months before he was caught. In most cases however unless there is a family member willing to take them in former foster children often become one of the legion of homeless roaming our cities streets. These children when pushed onto the streets are vulnerable to the most cruel and barbaric acts of exploitation.
I have been questioned as to why I feel babies would be better off dead rather than born into some situations. It is a matter of my concept of death. I believe that death of the physical body is merely a happy reunion with God. The Anti-abortionists obviously believe that physical life is worth any amount of pain the living being has to pay for it. Then again I have worked with these unloved and unwanted and probably hopefully, abandoned children. The ones who are not abandoned are so often abused; and if not killed, then scarred emotionally for life. Scarred so badly in fact that often they grow up to become the abusers. How can anyone believe this happening to a soul is preferable to returning to be with God before their heart and mind are corrupted and filled with the hate that would allow them to abuse their own children?
I have also heard the argument that God gave us life and we must accept it to show our gratitude. My question is always: Do you mean that you believe the soul isn't alive? That the soul is dead? No, God gave the soul life. The soul came before the physical body and the soul gives the physical body motion, nothing more, as it enters the body God provided for it on this earth. The physical body in and of itself is just a shell, or temple if you prefer, but an empty temple before the live soul enters it. So you see you need not accept the physical body in order to have life, or to be alive.
Anti-Abortioni st claim that abortion is used as an alternative to birth control and as a convenience for women. There have been no definitive studies conducted as reasons for choosing abortion that I am aware of. Figures and percentages are thrown around by both sides, but these are not to my knowledge backed by factual confirmation. Unofficially it was my experience as Planned Parenthood volunteer councilor that the reasons women choose abortion fall into one of the following categories: teenaged pregnancies, victims of rape, medical necessity, unmarried mothers who were already on welfare or trying to support a number of children with no help from a partner, married women who felt the economic burden of another child to raise would severely impact the family she already has, unmarried career women who simply do not want the burden of a child. No known birth control is 100% effective and "accidents" do happen. And abortion is not a walk in the park for the women. Besides being a serious medical procedure with accompanying physical distress, it is a very emotionally wrenching experience both before and certainly after the fact.
I personally spoke to only 7 women during my several years volunteering as a counselor at the clinic who chose abortion as a matter of convenience. That is an exact number as I remember each one of them and consider them each a failure on my part, In each case I felt the woman would have loved the child if she had given herself and the child a chance.
It is the Pro-Choice agencies and individuals who give counseling and offer pregnant women alternatives and help in place of the choice of abortion. No one claims abortion is better than live birth when the live birth has a chance of being anything but a disaster for the soul. The Anti-abortionists on the other hand seem only to offer hate and abuse coupled with a superficial morality. They offer no solutions and no help for the mother or the child; only venom and self-righteousness. Have you adopted one of those unwanted and unloved children? Well, neither have I, so I should probably not ask that question. But I always do because if all the Anti-abortionists would put their energies to finding homes for the millions of abandoned children just here in the United States they would be doing far more good than all their hate and shouting and even in some cases, killing.
Learn more about this author, Brenda Bowers.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
No
Quite frankly, I do not know when my life began. The date on which this earthly existence we call life began for me has been lost in the mystery of the past. The date simply is not known to me or to anyone now alive. I have a birth date, and that is well-documented. An official government document I have in my possession, plus more than sixty years of family custom confirm the date on which I was born - June 5, 1941. That is a firm, well-established fact with which I have no reason to argue. But that is not the issue here.
What I do not know is the date on which my life began. Speculation about that date is certainly possible, but it must always be speculation. I assume the beginning of my earthly existence lies somewhere in September of 1940, about nine months prior to my birth the following June.
But, what does it matter? We don't celebrate the day of our conception. We celebrate the day of our birth. After all, that is the day our families first met us and began to get acquainted with us. The date of our conception is hardly something to celebrate.
So what is the point being made here?
The point is just this. We celebrate the date of our birth for the obvious reason that it is a clear, discernible and historical event which can be documented. But celebrating the day of our birth does not mean we are celebrating the day our earthly existence began.
Life begins at conception, not at birth. Human life begins the exact moment one sperm cell penetrates one ovum to make a new human being. This fact has been verified by science and religion for thousands of years.
Until recently, human life was treated with respect from the moment of conception until natural death. Doctors took an oath that they would protect human life and do everything in their power to preserve it for as long as possible. To do anything less was unthinkable.
Human legal systems have also recognized the importance of human life at all its stages, from conception until natural death. Murder is universally condemned by all legal systems. If a human being is found dead at the hand of another, the legal system is relentless in tracking down the perpetrator and bringing him or her to justice. No cost is too great, no effort too much, no distance too far to pursue every clue, every shred of evidence until the guilty party is arrested. This is as it should be.
Religion has also traditionally taken a strong view of human life. The Christian Bible, for example, states that human life begins at conception and that it is a precious thing to be guarded and preserved. David, the writer of Psalm 139, states "thou hast possessed my reins: thou hast covered me in my mother's womb. I will praise Thee; for I am fearfully and wonderfully made."
Also, the ancient Hebrew society which was built on the laws God gave to His people demanded a very serious penalty from those who destroyed human life. Death was the prescribed penalty. If a man injured a pregnant woman, according to Exodus 21, and the injury resulted in the death of the unborn child, the man was to be put to death.
Human life is of the utmost importance. We cannot take human life without consequence, except in those situations prescribed by Scripture (war, the death penalty). The taking of human life otherwise involves a price that must be paid.
In January of 1973, the United States Supreme Court declared the taking of human life before birth to be legal and acceptable. The argument was made that desperate people were having abortions anyway, illegally and unsafely, and that it was a violation of their Constitutional rights to be forced to choose abortion at the expense of their own safety and security. Women were given a choice because of this decision. They could choose to give birth to a baby that might be unwanted for any number of reasons, or they could choose to abort that baby before it was born.
Choice. That is the word some have chosen to use in defense of this supposed right. A woman must have the right to choose what happens to her own body. It is not for others to decide, nor her husband, not her parents, not a doctor, not the law, and certainly not religion. It is her body, and it is a matter of her own personal choice. She is the only one who has the right to decide the issue of an unwanted pregnancy.
I agree. It is a matter of choice. But the right choice is not the one being offered by the pro-abortion people. The choice a woman has to make is not between birth and abortion, it is a choice between life and death.
Abortion inevitably involves the taking of human life. Death. In every abortion, over forty-five million in the United States alone since 1973, a human life has been terminated. Death has ended the life of every one of those human beings that were aborted by their mother's choice. It is true that death ends every human life. But aborted babies die at the hands of the one who should protect them.
In all America's wars combined, the American death rate has not approached that of abortion. In World War II, the total number of deaths for the whole world equals the number of Americans who have died in abortions. Forty-five million people died worldwide in that terrible war. But the war on the unborn has claimed that many American lives.
There are many reasons why women are counseled to consider an abortion today. Perhaps the baby will be defective in some way. He or she will be a burden on the parents, and perhaps on society as well. Or perhaps there are too many babies. Abortion is commonly advocated in multiple births today. Or perhaps the woman did not intend to get pregnant and is unable to provide proper care for the infant. Abortion is offered as a relatively simple solution to the problem the existence of a new life presents to the woman. A common reason for abortion must be the convenience of the mother. Either it will be too challenging for her to raise the child with a birth defect, or she is not able to raise the child who has no defect. Either way, the abortion ends the problem.
Or does it? The woman was offered a choice. Her choice was life for her unborn child, or death for the child. Either choice she makes, she will live with that choice for the rest of her life. If she chooses death, living with that choice may not be such an easy thing to do.
What things might the child have accomplished if allowed to live? What joy might the child have brought to a couple capable and willing to adopt? What possibilities were destroyed by the woman's choice of an abortion?
When I was conceived in the fall of 1940, my parents were not given the choice of destroying me before my birth. They would not have considered it had they been given the choice, but in today's world they might have been counseled to consider it. I was the fifth of my parents' six children. Their eldest son was approaching the age he would most likely be involved in the military, and World War II was already threatening American and Canadian involvement. They already had a child severely retarded and suffering from epilepsy.
Does it make sense to anyone when I say I am so glad they did not consider abortion, and were not counseled by anyone to consider abortion? Does it make sense when I say that the forty-five million plus people aborted in this country would have said the same thing if someone had made the choice for them to live?
It certainly is a matter of choice. And when given the choice between the life of an unborn child and its death, there can be no other sensible and right choice. We must always choose life.
In the Old Testament scriptures, Deuteronomy 30:19, God, in speaking to His people, said, "I call heaven and earth to record against you,that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live.
A simple matter of choice lies before us. We must choose life.
Learn more about this author, Tom Parsons.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Difference of opinion? Debate now.
- Constitutional & Contract Law
- Should the Internet be monitored and taxed by the government?
- Did the Supreme Court rule correctly in the New Haven firefighters case?
- Should religious organizations be prevented from participating in politics?
- Should religion be banned from all public places?
- Should a human ovum be granted legal "personhood?"
- Is the US Constitution a "living" document, which should change over time?
