No

• 1 of 11

  by Sandi Crain

  Created on: November 04, 2009   Last Updated: November 05, 2009

  As of 2001, the United States was responsible for supplying 45.8% of the world's weaponry. From 1992

• 2 of 11

  by UrMessage

  Created on: October 22, 2009   Last Updated: October 25, 2009

  America is no longer the world's super power and the sooner we admit this, the sooner we can start to

• 3 of 11

  by Gary C. Gibson

  Created on: May 25, 2007

  Reduction of conventional weapons overseas is antipathetic to corporatist policy and socialist methodology.

• 4 of 11

  by Ted Sherman

  Created on: May 25, 2007

  During the last weeks of World War II, I was a sailor in a Navy task force that, along with massive

• 5 of 11

  by Nouri Arif

  Created on: May 25, 2007

  It seems that the issue here is the word "conventional". If the question were asked of nuclear arms

• 6 of 11

  by James Coles

  Created on: August 21, 2007

  Reducing conventional arms caches around the world is part of the Left's Utopian Dream, i.e., the U.N.ists'

• 7 of 11

  by Jared Garrett

  Created on: May 24, 2007

  Spending US taxpayer money to reduce conventional arms caches around the world would be one of the daftest

• 8 of 11

  by Jennifer Claerr

  Created on: May 25, 2007

  It is not the responsibility of the United States to reduce the arms caches of other countries. I grow

• 9 of 11

  by Christopher Kendalls

  Created on: March 06, 2008   Last Updated: March 10, 2008

  What a novel idea; the policeman of the world not only fights the honorable battle of trying to use

• 10 of 11

  by Nathan Breck

  Created on: June 18, 2007

  There are so many reasons to oppose this issue. But I'll take it like this. Let's say, for the sake

• 11 of 11

  by Aleksandar Vrazinovski

  Created on: May 25, 2007

  It is time for the US guverment to turn to US not wasting it's money and efforts somewhere......for