Home > Politics, News & Issues > US Politics > Government & Policies
Results so far:
| Yes | 42% | 434 votes | Total: 1039 votes | |
| No | 58% | 605 votes |
Yes
Created on: February 11, 2012 Last Updated: February 12, 2012
There are no lines waiting at the Vatican for the Pope to dispense birth control pills. However, there may surely be an employee or two waiting at St. Anonymous hospital for the same or other related services, and expecting these services to be at least partially covered by their health insurance!
This should never have been a political issue. Religiously affiliated employers are not a rarity. The only difference between St. John's Whatever and Corner Clinic is a name. Many of the employers or owners of Corner Clinic may be devout Catholic, Baptists or...Mormons, for all we know. The difference is that they know when they put on their EMPLOYER HAT, they may not and should not drop their respective spiritual and ethical beliefs BUT they have to comply with several important employer-related responsibilities - that is, if they want to stay in business. Some of these responsibilities include an equitable, non-discriminatory workplace environment, free from varied forms of harassment, a safe, OSHA protected workplace, minimum wage, work week and overtime guidelines, taxes and, oh yes, COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH INSURANCE. Anyone believing that birth control and related health issues are not part of the 21st century female profile is still waiting for the French fleet to hit England!
This is not a political issue - this is an employer issue but the Church has made it political because, once again, they are attempting to assess their political strength in the coming elections and marshal their political forces for influence and power. They want to be aligned with the reigning Republicans and Conservatives in the House and, if there is power to be garnered in the ultra right wing movement, they want to be in on that front, as well. It's a good plan. It makes the Church the Joan of Arc for the right and the righteous.
But to reiterate, this is actually not political, this is a purely employer related issue. If the Catholic Church is engaging in any type of business that is not totally and wholly supported by TITHES and OFFERINGS, then they are working in the public domain. If the Church is following the same employer guidelines as their pagan counterparts, they cannot arbitrarily choose which guidelines they will or will not follow. They cannot and should not be allowed to sift through insurance options and choose only those that fit their religious profile even though these options clearly under-serve a large proportion of their employees. Now, if the Church decides to employ only devout Catholics, then they would not have a problem at all - however, they may find themselves at the losing end of a discrimination lawsuit... and the Vatican's resources may be a little depleted due to other recent scandals.
And if the Church is allowed to choose what options their insurance covers, will they stop at birth control? What about addiction services, including nicotine? What about medical services to counteract sexual diseases - what about Aids? What about old fashioned, fire and brimstone STD's? Will they cover long-term medical care for the hapless female reduced to back-in-the-day back alley hanger abortions? And of course, the mental illnesses are all demon related so that's not even an insurance issue. So when you really think about it, most major illnesses come from sin - in some form or another. So why cover any of them - why not do away with health insurance altogether?
As always, Jesus said it best, "Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's and to God, the things that are God's." Pretty simple. What the Church needs to be doing is providing all who come to them with the safety net that is Jesus Christ and sharing His love, forgiveness and joy. There is no sense in condemning the abortion when you could have been on hand to pray for the relationship or the circumstance. There's no sense in denying birth control after a woman has had 1 or 2 children and is struggling or, her teen daughter is already gone the wrong way and she desperately wants to keep her infant free for a few more years. The Church is always after the fact and it's always condemning. Let's go back to the old times and get your hands dirty in the real work of the ministry. Go into the highway and byways, knock on doors like the Jehovah Witnesses, who deserve a lot of respect, and talk to the young girls who are contemplating that big step with the guy who talks so sweet and looks so fine... It's too late when the horse is out of the barn.
The Catholic Church and their fat and greasy counterparts, need to look more to the work of God and less to the work of their own personal ministries. The Catholic Church is the old money religion and these "stars" of the gospel world are the new money religions, and none of them are giving to God what is God's but they sure know how to kick it to Caesar.
Learn more about this author, Abena Nkromah.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
No
Created on: February 13, 2012
Good grief! Into which area will the federal government next stick its over-sized nose? The use or non-use of birth control is surely a private decision. Those who want it can purchase their own; the cost is not prohibitive.
If legislators decided to offer free insulin to diabetics or free inoculations to children, it would be much more beneficial for the population as a whole. There would be no cries of outrage; in fact the waves of gratitude which would follow such decisions would win the governing party many votes in upcoming elections.
However, if the government is determined to offer free birth control to every employee in the land, should the employers not have a say in the matter? Many would accept; others, such as religiously affiliated employers, would decline. For example, Roman Catholic hospitals, school boards, child care agencies and other institutions are against artificial means of birth control. They don't want these freebies and should not be forced to accept them.
If the government autocratically enforces this policy of availability of free birth control to every employee, then those employers who wish to decline should certainly not be forced to pay for it. It would be much more just to have the cost deducted from the wages of those legislators who enacted and enforced the policy.
Birth control and abortion are hot-button religious issues. The decisions on if, when and how the means of avoiding pregnancy, or of terminating one, are personal, private and highly emotional decisions for those involved. Every argument for and against each issue should be considered before any decisions are made.
Roman Catholics and some Evangelical Christians believe that the foetus is a human being from the moment of conception. Therefore, to deliberately destroy a child through abortion is legalized murder.
Similarly, to attempt to thwart, through artificial means, God's intent and power to create a new human person , is also sinful. There are means of natural birth control available to Catholic married couples who wish to plan their families responsibly.
If birth control devices were as available as jelly beans in a candy dish, young or emotionally-immature women would probably consider them a licence to indulge in increasingly promiscuous behavior. Does our society really need more of this type of conduct?
The American government has long insisted on a policy of separation of church and state. By his determination to impose this legislation on every employer, President Obama is deviating from this long-established principle. He is trying to force Catholic employers, and those of other faiths who oppose artificial birth control, to make contraceptives available to their employees. To add insult to injury, he would have these employers assume the cost of doing so.
This is unacceptable. The President of the United States and his cohorts should busy themselves with the well being and security of the nation and the promotion of world peace. Their over-sized noses are neither needed nor wanted in matters concerning the personal reproductive issues affecting American citizens.
Learn more about this author, Carolyn Tytler.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.