Search Helium

Home > Politics, News & Issues > International Politics > Politics in Africa

Should Muamar Gaddafi have been given a trial?

Results so far:

Yes
48% 145 votes Total: 303 votes
No
52% 158 votes

Yes

by William Jones

Created on: October 24, 2011   Last Updated: October 25, 2011

Yes in my opinion Muamar Gaddafi should have been given a fair trial. The United States and the other western powers are playing a dangerous game of becoming the jury and executor. Whatever crimes he was charged with, I still believe he had the right to a fair trial. Who gave the United States and France the right to overthrown an independent President in a free nation?                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 This This has become the pattern in the last 5 to 10 years of overthrowing a President of independent countries. To just name a few of them Iraq, and Egypt. Who and what countries are next on the western power list to overthrow? Will it be Iran, and Pakistan? This happens when you believe you are the judge and jury.

Who gave the United States and the other western powers the right to tell a president of a free country to leave or they will force him out?

This is why I believe Muamar Gaddafi should have had a fair trial and not be murdered by some out of control rebels. The President of a free country should never be treated like that of a common criminal. They are the leaders of a free and independent country and should be treat that way. Doesn’t matter what the crime is he or she is charged with; they still should have their day in international courts.

As far as most people understand, the United States and other western powers did not declared war against Libya and Muamar Gaddafi. Even if they did declare war on him and his country, he still deserves a fair trial at an international world court.

Now most leaders of free countries must be afraid that the United States and the leaders of the western countries are eyeing to take over their countries. What would stop the United States and western leaders from running over their countries? If they don’t have to declare war on them and give the presidents of a free country an international trial.

Furthermore even if they disagree or agree with a president’s policies they must exercise respect for that president and his free country right to make their own decisions. It’s not the United States right or job to make judgments on how someone runs their free independent country.

In addition, the people of the United States must all stand up and tell our leaders to stop raiding free countries. And remind them we didn’t put you in power to rule the world.

The citizens of the world will support the stopping of a violent leader from a free country. But you must declare war on them and get international approval. Otherwise the United States would be in the business of overthrowing any leader who does not agree with our agendas.


Learn more about this author, William Jones.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.

No

by Mariam Demian

Created on: October 25, 2011

I begin with trepidation, realizing that 'no' is the less favorable answer to this question. However I cannot see the alternative as being one that will bring comfort to the families of those who lost their lives under the Gaddafi regime. In fact I was perplexed at hearing of the multiple sources who demanded that a coroner determine the exact cause of his death; not because I believe in capital punishment or am against fair justice systems but because of the simplified fact that 'he got what he deserved'.

To put him on trial would be to give him a certain amount of dignity that he took away from an unquantifiable number of people. I understand that this, perhaps, elementary way of thinking is somewhat archaic and barbaric. An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind was what Mahatma Gandhi taught us a long time ago, but Gaddafi's fate was befitting of a man who turned the world against him.

In the midst of the Arab Spring, seeing the way in which his neighbouring dictators, Ben Ali and Mubarak, were forced to leave their self-entitled 'thrones' and humiliated on a global scale, one can almost be certain someone like Gaddafi rationalized his stubborn grip in Libya and refusal to step down with the fact that 'the other two were not as good at fighting'. Ghaddafi literally fought to the death and while there are conflicting reports on his last words or the truth of his last moments, there is certainty in the joy that befell the country and its citizens at hearing of his demise.

There is a sweet and sick justice in his never getting to be held accountable formally in a public domain in my view. Gaddafi fought dirty and the boomerang effect took hold in his final days. His enemies had no mercy on him as he had no mercy on them. Quite similar to Mubarak's days of 'leadership', yet somehow Mubarak's sins never quite added up to the atrocities and human injustices that Gaddafi had inflicted on innocent people.

If Muammar Ghaddafi had in fact been brought to trial in Libya or an international court what would have followed would without doubt include lengthy hearings where he is displayed on television screens and plastered on newspapers as the headline of the day every time there was a turn in the trial that was deemed news- worthy. Most likely, depending on where he'd be held, he would have also gotten some sort of prisoner protection and the entire world would be watching, until an illness or age got the best of him.

Once again, that all adds up to him being treated with a level of respect that he did not bestow on the men and women that were killed and buried in the desert sands, never to be tracked until recently. To give him a fair trial would also be, in my opinion, a slap in the face of those who lost loved ones in the 1988 Pan Am flight  whose bombers were protected by Gaddafi, who also did not offer compensation to victims until 2001 when he wanted to secure lifting of sanctions on his country.

He was a mad man, an evil genius and a showman who wouldn't settle for anything less that all eyes on him. Our eyes should now be focused on a renewal in the North African region where hope now resides, not on a man who had no regard for anyone but himself.

Learn more about this author, Mariam Demian.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.


CONNECT WITH US

Read
our blog
Helum for writers

Write and get published
Share with other writers
Polish your freelancing skills

Join our active writing community
Helium Content Source for Publishers

Quality articles from proven freelancers
Exclusive rights, fast turnaround
Brand engagement, business blogging -- our writers do it all

Get custom content today!

INFORMATION


Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA