Search Helium

Home > Politics, News & Issues > International Politics > Politics in Africa

Should Muamar Gaddafi have been given a trial?

Results so far:

Yes
48% 151 votes Total: 312 votes
No
52% 161 votes

Yes

by William Nelson

Created on: February 26, 2012

Anyone who is captured alive should be given a fair trial; this is an issue of human rights. I am not a supporter of the Gaddafi regime, I am a proponent of treating all humans with dignity, no matter how vile or cruel they seem to be. Gaddafi deserves a fair trial, just like any other man or woman.

The most obvious argument is that of the slippery slope. If we support the torture and killing of a tyrant in Libya, then we may feel more comfortable supporting the torture and killing of other war criminals. If we don't hold trials for war criminals we may begin indiscriminately killing other criminals without trial. Even the Nazis were given the opportunity to plead their cases at the Nuremburg Trials and they were found guilty and executed; justice was done. We don't have to devolve into Martial Law in order to restore order, in fact that is a step in the wrong direction.

Yes, Gaddafi was responsible for the deaths of many of his people, but that does not give them the authority to brutalize and murder him. Many people felt similarly towards Abraham Lincoln after the Civil War claimed the lives of 600,000 Americans, but we still condemn his assassination. Leaders of nations are often guilty of committing atrocities, but they are also usually responsible for helping their people in some way as well.

Gaddafi, although fascist and tyrannical in nature, truly believed that what he was doing was best for his country, and although he had many of his critics silenced, he did give back to his country through socializing oil profits. I don't personally agree with state enforced socialization of industry, but this type of behavior coming from Gaddafi exhibits his duel nature, and in all reality, the duel nature of man. He was trying to give back to his people in his own way. Painting him as nothing but a maniacal mad-man is the easy way out for the person who unquestioningly consumes their foreign affairs news from mainstream media sources with double checking the facts. It is very easy for people to be tricked into hating a certain group of people based on propaganda, this is why it is wrong to condemn anyone to death before granting them equal and due process of law. 

All humans have good and bad qualities, they are intrinsically corrupt. On the other hand, the law is fixed and when applied equally to all is not as corrupt as humans. This is why we must apply the law equally to all, whether they are a tyrant or a common thief. No man should be above the law, and no man should suffer and be unprotected by the law.

Learn more about this author, William Nelson.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.

No

by Robert Bury

Created on: January 28, 2012   Last Updated: January 30, 2012

In my opinion, no, Muamar Gaddafi should not have been given a trial. His crimes upon many people have been horrendous and inhumane. Furthermore, the people he persecuted did not receive a trial, did they? Other countries acted with good judgement when they overthrew his evil regime. Thus, he should not have been given a trial.

People may hold the opinion that it is unfair for the United Nations and other countries to act on the behalf of other countries. However, the people who made the decisions in regards to overthrowing Gaddafi are some of the most brillliant and intelligent people on this planet. Those who disagree with me should put themselves in the shoes of a leader of a country within the United Nations. If a murderous and unfair tyrant held power over a country, what would you do? If someone was abusing their power to the amount of hundreds of lives, and billions of dollars, again, what would you do? Intelligent people, such as the leaders representing the various countries that make up the United Nations, take into account all the factors of the equation - this time it was to go after Gaddafi.

Gaddafi was not a "leader of a free and independent country", he was an evil man, as any rebel would tell you. If he was a "leader of a free and independent country", then he would be respected, not overthrown and rebelled against. I think that it is reasonable for countries and their leaders to exercise their right to attack other countries when they disagree with their policies. Do you think that Libya was like America? That's why our leaders decided to attack Gaddafi? Violence is a last resort - and that it what was required to bring that evil man down. Most likely, if we had not taken action, billions more would be stolen, along with hundreds more lives.

In my opinion, a trial in International Court would be ridiculous. I doubt there is any legitimate evidence that proves Gaddafi's innocence, however, legal talent can be paid for with a few ill-gotten bucks. The trial would have been dragged on, and Gaddafi would continue to live his lavish lifestyle, at least for quite a while, with the legal talent he could afford. I agree; this may not sound very democratic, but a dictatorship seems quite the latter, also. So, Gaddafi is dead, there was no trial, and soon, there will be another terrorist to take his place. However, I think we should enjoy the lack of evil, at least for a while.



Learn more about this author, Robert Bury.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.


CONNECT WITH US

Read
our blog
Helum for writers

Write and get published
Share with other writers
Polish your freelancing skills

Join our active writing community
Helium Content Source for Publishers

Quality articles from proven freelancers
Exclusive rights, fast turnaround
Brand engagement, business blogging -- our writers do it all

Get custom content today!

INFORMATION


Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA