Home > Politics, News & Issues > International Politics > Politics in the Middle & Near East
Results so far:
| Yes | 41% | 76 votes | Total: 186 votes | |
| No | 59% | 110 votes |
Yes
Created on: February 14, 2011 Last Updated: February 18, 2011
The Egyptian "revolution" that started January 25th in Cairo and ended with President Hosni Mubarak's departure from office will be good for their neighbor Israel to the East only if Egypt's government does not fall into the hands of anti-Israel Islamic fundamentalists. It does not appear thusfar that the young, liberal, educated Egyptians who started the revolution nor Egypt's older, experienced economic elite want the Muslim Brotherhood or any other one-sided religious or ideological group to run the country.
As of this date, the Egyptian army has taken control of the day-to-day administration of Egypt. They have publically stated that they will continue to honor the Egyptian-Israeli peace accords which have been in place for years despite both President Mubarak and Vice President Suleiman's loss of political power. Egypt's progressive revolutionaries, for example the young Google executive from Dubai, United Arab Emirates, Wael Gohnim, seems to be unconcerned with any political ambitions himself. He and his followers, however, have made it clear that they did not fight for freedom for nothing and do not wish to go back to any kind of regime or any political power who would impose Marshall Law, loss of freedom of the press and speech or be otherwise unconstructive to a new and improved Egypt.
The most notable thing about the transition changes taking place in Egypt right now is the confidence of the Egyptian people. They have asked for no help from outsiders, although I do believe they want their money back from any accounts, specifically the Swiss accounts, where Egyptian funds collected over years of despotic rule may have been squirreled away. Egypt also can boast that they have had several Nobel prize winners and two who are living, ElBaradei (who unfortunately tossed his hat into the ring alongside the Muslim Brotherhood) and Ahmed Zewail (Council of Advisors on Science and Technology) have both returned to Egypt to help with the transition period. The old regime relied upon a council of "wise men" who I assume will continue in that role. This group has been primarily successful religious, business and professional people who have helped determine the course of Egypt's destiny of the last 30 years.
Egypt is home to many sacred and historical sites such as the pyramids. They also hold control over the most major port site in history, the Suez Canal, so it is not anticipated that the Egyptian Army is going to allow any major disruptions to the peace and security of that great nation. That would include any uprisings from Palestine over territories in Israel, although Egypt has historically sided with the Islamic Palestinians. Israel's Defense leader Ahud Barak (not to be confused with Barack Obama), and Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (who studied in the U.S. ) both have spoken out now publically about their concerns. They now see who was behind the revolution in Egypt and also understand that such democratic desire can and will spread throughout the region to other countries like their other neighbors Jordan, Syria and Lebanon. This can only be good news for Israel, if infact the old fundamentalist and despotic regimes fall while educated, open-minded, economically secure folks take control of those outlying regions. Iran is another story, since they had an opportunity which was lost to what now appears to be a theocracy or a country ruled by religious mandate. This has not stopped the Iranian people from pushing for a more democratic regime. Bahrain, Libya and even the so-called American-led and "liberated" Iraq are now asking for greater freedoms and less corruption. If the people of these regions who are relying on ideological changes succeed in their influence, it might prove a great boon to Israel's attempts at conciliation among their neighboring countries. If religious overlords or despots control the countries, it will prove difficult for Israel to carry on conversations of peace.
Israel has always weathered many storms. After all, they came from near extinction to being able to restore their homeland's property, wealth, language and culture since 1948! Biblical prophecy has always weighed on the side of Israel being winners one way or another. What we will see and probably should see from Egypt's revolution on behalf of Israel is a more rapid, refreshing and reinvigorated conversation about bringing peace throughout the Arab, Islamic, Christian, Jewish and secular regions.
Learn more about this author, Cinda Smaagaard.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
No
Created on: February 14, 2011 Last Updated: February 16, 2011
Though I like to see a free form of government in the middle east, and fully support the Egyptian people in the current endeavor, I see this as a bad thing for Israel. We have here in the west traded on the stability that the dictatorship in Egypt has created. Almost thirty years of military style civil control, and emergency police powers has been an oppressive force over the people of Egypt it has led to stabilty in the region.
Mubarek's policy of following the Camp David accords and not retracting the peace process that Sadat started has allowed the region to flourish both economically as well as culturally. The enforced peace has allowed Israel a chance to develop without the pressure of yet another hostile regime on their western flank.
The dangers of the revolution in Egypt though are clear. We banter words like free and fair elections around like that will solve the worlds problems, yet here at the heart of the democratic process, we still have calls of corruption and we have been doing this for over 250 years. Do we really expect the elections if they even happen to be free and fair? Do we sit by and allow a hostile regime to usurp the government of this strategic area or will we interfere? If we threaten of even posture like we would is it free and fair? Their is a lot of anger and resentment between the Israelis and Arabs of the region and has been for years. Though the tensions ebb and flow they are and will continue to be a powder keg for the minority that use these events to empower themselves.
The danger of the other surrounding Arab states revolting and throwing out the sitting governments has to be terrifying. The chances of friendly regimes in these other areas are slim to none. As we sit here in the west and watch as these events unfold around the world, we have a habit of looking through our eyes at the situation (this one and any other around the world). The reality though is that the Israelis are living in a country smaller than the State of New Jersey. They both have a coastline and this is where the similarities end. Imagine that the States of New York, Pennsylvania and Delaware, were at constant war or threat of war with you. Welcome to Israel. Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt and Saudi Arabia as well as Iraq are all near neighbors. Of all these, only Egypt has been not so much as friendly but more like not overtly threatening to the country. When one is surrounded by enemies, then any instability in the countries around them will lead to concern. Multiply this by each neighbor and not knowing what the people will choose for a form of government and it is a recipe for disaster.
So even though I advocate the Egyptians taking control of their country, I do fear for the state of Israel.
Learn more about this author, Erik Bonthron.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.