Home > Health & Fitness > Medical Issues > Health Care
Results so far:
| Yes | 46% | 1024 votes | Total: 2207 votes | |
| No | 54% | 1183 votes |
Yes
Created on: January 21, 2011
Not only do I believe that Obamacare is good, but I have considerable experience with why it's needed.
I'm part of a charity that helps families through emergency situations. We provide food, clothing, Christmas gifts and various necessities. Our clients have suffered through anything from the death of a loved one, illnesses, accidents and divorce. If it causes enough stress on a family's finances to dismantle them, then we will be there. Over the years we've helped a lot of people.
The single largest problem we face is medical. Whether someone has insurance or not, one long term illness or catastrophic accident can wipe out finances faster than any other type of emergency. We've heard horror stories about how insurance companies wouldn't pay for one treatment as compared to another, or even had dropped the person because he took ill. We've heard other stories about how a person couldn't get insurance or employment because of a preexisting condition.
I remember one situation where a man had just gotten a job, but when his wife was diagnosed with MS, he was fired. According to his new employer, the insurance company refused to cover either him or his wife. Another time we worked with a man who fell down a flight of metal stairs at work. The insurance company first tried to say he didn't do any damage, even though x-rays showed that he had shattered several vertebra. They also said that there should be no reason he couldn't walk or should have problems walking. After a few weeks of being bedridden, he began using a brace. It was painful to watch him as he struggled to stay on his feet. At that point the insurance company tried to say that he did it at home and faked a fall at work.
We've seen people lose their homes because of all forms of cancer, and we've seen families shattered because of injuries sustained in car accidents. We've dealt with people who have taken up residence in cars or cheap hotels because they had no where else to go.
What most people don't understand is that this is cumulative. The more people who find themselves without insurance because employers can't afford to provide insurance, and those who aren't 'insurable', add up. It all started with one person who was denied insurance or coverage, and it grew from there. Within a twenty four hour period, it became six, and 100 before the week was out. It's a few million now, and before this bill is actually in full force, it will be a few million more.
This has a cumulative effect on the overall health of the country and will eventually effect our mortality rate. When one doesn't have insurance, the chances are when he or she takes ill, he won't visit a doctor until that point when he has no other choice. Not only are doctors expensive, so is medicine. By putting it off, treatment is more complicated and more expensive. And when one doesn't have the facility to pay for his care, then the price of care goes up for everyone.
There's no excuse for this. This is the United States of America. Once upon a time we were the strongest, healthiest, most progressive country in the world. Today we're falling behind in every aspect of life. My only disappointment is that the bill didn't go far enough. It should have created a single payer system or universal health care.
Learn more about this author, Jude Coyle.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
No
Created on: January 22, 2011
The Obama health care plan Congress passed in 2010 a very bad idea on several levels. Indeed the new law would be a disaster for the American people.
For starters, let’s examine the cost of the law to every American citizen as well as the negative impact the law would have on the economy as a whole. Rep. Paul Ryan estimates that the plan would add $701 billion to the deficit based on an estimated $1.4 trillion in spending over the next 10 years with spending to increase in subsequent years. A large portion of the spending involves $460 billion in subsidies as an inducement for participation in the Obamacare exchanges. The subsidized “free” healthcare encourages unemployment as a job would no longer be needed to get health coverage. Instead, the cost of the insurance would be borne by the taxpayer. This is a gift to big business.
And, incidentally, laws are already in place that prevents an employer from asking about pre-existing health conditions which means that employed people receive such coverage. This is why less than 10 thousand people have applied for Obamacare with pre-existing conditions. Under the Obama plan, the cost of this coverage is transferred from the corporation to the taxpayer, another gift to big business. Republicans have suggested rational alternatives in which the poor and the uninsurable with pre-existing conditions would be covered by a mandatory pool funded by insurance companies on a state level with some subsidies. Under this plan the taxpayer would be off the hook, the insurance companies would have catastrophic cases off their rolls which would drive down premiums, and the bill would still be paid by the insurance companies, not the taxpayer.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that the law would result on the loss of 650,000 jobs mostly in the health care industry and related health industries. The law mandates that insurance companies mandate 80% of their revenue to insurance which would put little companies out of business or force them to lay people off, something that is already occurring. This is another gift to big business; in this case the big insurance companies.
Obamacare plans to offer coverage to 30 million Americans through Medicaid which has been a program that has offered block grants to the States, which then provide matching funds, as a means to cover the poor. By expanding the program, Obamacare would transfer funds from Medicaid, a program that has been paid for by working people to cover their health needs upon retirement, to a program that has not been funded. The CBO estimates that the increased government spending on Medicaid under the Obama law would be $75 to $100 billion per year, a bill that would be covered either by a tax increase or an expansion in the national debt. Additionally, the states would be required to increase their spending, and to levy state taxes to cover the expense which is why over 20 states are trying to opt out. Meanwhile Medicare coverage is already being cut back on the elderly.
In fact, through Medicare the government under Obamacare would restrict doctors from providing various treatments and penalizing them if they do. One of the main selling points of Obamacare was that the government would stop this practice by private insurance companies yet the government plan would do the same thing. This would constitute the direct interference by the government into the private doctor-patient relationship. Republicans have proposed regulating the insurance companies while leaving insurance and medicinal decisions, in the hands of the private individual where it belongs. This also constitutes the rationing of healthcare that the defenders of Obamacare have gone to such lengths to deny.
There is much more to examine, but I will leave off by mentioning the most controversial part of Obamacare and that is the mandatory purchase of insurance. This law, which will not save the consumer money, constitutes the first time in American history in which the citizen is required by law to buy something. This centerpiece of Obamacare has already been declared unconstitutional by Virginia Federal Judge Henry Hudson. Let’s hope that more Americans wake up to the constitutional threat that this law poses.
Learn more about this author, Chuck Morse.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.