Search Helium

Home > Relationships & Family > Marriage & Divorce > Cheating Spouses & Affairs

Is infidelity ever acceptable?

Results so far:

Yes
20% 73 votes Total: 372 votes
No
80% 299 votes

Yes

by Wayne Leon Learmond

Created on: December 07, 2010   Last Updated: December 08, 2010

The question has to be asked, was the human species meant to be monogamous? When one looks at other life forms - other than human - one can clearly see that monogamy is rare indeed in the natural world. Granted, there are a few animals and birds that mate and stay together for life - such as the swan, for example. But in the natural world they are the exception, rather than the rule. It seems in the natural world, that everybody is doing it with everybody else and be damned the consequences.

There are many however, that state that the human species are a breed apart from the animals and birds within the natural world. And, it is because of this, that we should remain monogamous. Why should this be the case? If it is good enough for the animals and birds, why then cannot it be good enough for us? The other thing that sets us apart from the animal kingdom is the emotion of love. We say that we love our partners and never want to be without them

Somewhere deep within the human psyche is a trigger and the trigger is so evident within the human race that it cannot be ignored. Our senses work in such a way that we are attracted to whoever takes our fancy, whether we be attached or not. In fact, the laws of attraction continue to work and do not stop simply because the person may be wearing a wedding band.

If one takes a serious look at the whole subject of monogamy within the human race, then one has to say that - as in the animal kingdom - it is rare. So, does that mean then that we are no more than animals? Sowing our seeds wherever and whenever the fancy takes us?

Indeed, to stick to just one partner for the rest of your life is a feat, and an achievement. But, is it natural? The one thing that separates and sets us above the animals and birds, is the knowledge of right and wrong. It is because of this knowledge and this awareness, this - conscience - that we suffer pangs of guilt. But again, why should this be the case?

If we are only following our natural instincts that we have followed for millennia, since we lived in caves, then why should we feel any less guilty? Religion has played a massive part in trying to dumb down our urges for each other and, as in everything else, religion has tried to stem our natural sexual urges to such a degree that there are many people who rigidly stick to the strict guidelines of marriage. This is simply because the huge weight of guilt has been placed upon our heads by religion.

Yes, we are more than the sum of our parts, we are more than the animals, birds and fish that we see around us. Yet, knowing that, does it make us any less sexual? We are a species with feelings and desires within and all those who believe in the sanctity of marriage have dumbed down their feelings. This they have done to such an extent that now divorce rates are at a record high. Is this because they are not being honest with each other from the start?

Why is this? It seems that the marriage vows are becoming a thing of the past and, indeed marriage overall, is not all that it is made out to be. Granted, there are countless many who marry and stay together for the rest of their lives, whose eyes are only for each other and no one else. But yet, there are others who simply cannot remain 'faithful', in the true sense of the word.

Yes, they may love their husbands, wives, partners, with all of their hearts, and would die for them too. But the complexity of the human race deems it that within us there seems to be a trigger. This trigger is activated within us and so we stray. Is this libido? Are these natural urges that we simply cannot control because they are ingrained within us? Why should we try and control and stem something that is so deep-seated within us?

Scientists are looking at the whole question of infidelity and trying to figure out what it is that makes someone, although they may be married, stray? We are separate from the animal kingdom in so many ways, yet, at the same time, we are part of it still. Are these 'urges' clues as to what we really are and cannot escape from?

To sum up, infidelity is acceptable depending in which society you happen to live in. For instance, within some African cultures, it is natural to have more than one wife at any given time. Would such a thing be accepted in the western world? What may seem strange to one race of people, is perfectly natural to another race - especially if it is a part of their culture.

For people to have more than one wife, does it may them any less respectable in our eyes? They may love each wife equally, or indeed have their favourites, but who are we to judge? In the west we frown upon such things because it is unnatural to us. But is it? With infidelity rates shooting up all the time, it puts into question the whole scenario of marriage and the marriage vows. Indeed, could we, in the west, be experiencing our natural born urges coming through {as much as we try to deny them?} It is indeed, food for thought.

Learn more about this author, Wayne Leon Learmond.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.

No

by Jennifer Lynn

Created on: August 15, 2010

Infidelity.  The very definition of the word implies its offense.  Its definition includes terms as "disloyalty", "breach of trust", and "transgression".  One cannot be "disloyal" to someone when loyalty isn't expected, just as one cannot breach trust that was not already in place.  Infidelity can not be any more acceptable than any other transgression against another human being.  The argument that society is becoming more lenient in terms of faithfulness doesn't speak to the hurt that is caused by the transgressor, but speaks to the fact that many in our society would like to be excused from any wrongdoing because guilt is not the "in thing".  Wrongdoing can always be justified to the one who committed the act.  That does not make it acceptable or right.

For infidelity to be possible, there first needs to be an understanding or agreement that the two involved parties will remain faithful to each other (marriage, long-standing relationships, etc.).  Breaking that agreement is, in effect, a breach of contract.  In any other instance, a breach of contract is not acceptable.  Because emotions are involved in the relational contract, some have convinced themselves that this contract is less valid and is in fact acceptable to break.  Truly, because emotions are involved, the opposite should be true.  The relational contract is tied to the heart and soul of two people.  It is not just a signature on a piece of paper or a sum of money given for a service that is expected to be rendered.  Breaking this contract is making the conscious decision that your desires are more important than the heart of the other that you once professed to love.  Should that ever be acceptable?  For the sake of humanity, I can only hope that selfishness does not go so far as to become popular and accepted.

The other argument that is sometimes used is that the two people are no longer "in love", so infidelity should be expected.  The truth about that statement is this: the feeling of infatuation that is associated with the term, "in love", cannot last for the entirety of anyone's life.  It is a "momentary high".  Love that lasts a lifetime is able to withstand that life's ups and downs because it has been away from that feeling, through the fire, and back out again.  True love is formed over time, when couples learn how to get through life's struggles together, celebrate together, and be content with each other.  If infidelity is acceptable, then these things will never take place. 

If it is acceptable to break a contract of souls, then it will probably be broken.  It will be broken because life is hard and so are relationships.  If it is acceptable to leave when things get tough, then the relationship will not last long and true love will never be discovered.  Infidelity is only acceptable in a world where fleeting happiness is more important than a joyful life, and momentary pleasures are more important than a life of love.  That is not the world that I choose.

Learn more about this author, Jennifer Lynn.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.


CONNECT WITH US

Read
our blog
Helum for writers

Write and get published
Share with other writers
Polish your freelancing skills

Join our active writing community
Helium Content Source for Publishers

Quality articles from proven freelancers
Exclusive rights, fast turnaround
Brand engagement, business blogging -- our writers do it all

Get custom content today!

INFORMATION


Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA