Search Helium

Home > Parenting & Pregnancy > Parenting (Other)

Is having children a right?

Results so far:

Yes
43% 33 votes Total: 76 votes
No
57% 43 votes

Yes

by Jennifer Mcmillan

Created on: October 13, 2010

Most humans are capable of reproduction.  It is a biological process that is part of our bodies from the day we are born.  Regardless of how “fit” a person may seem to be a parent, it does not change the fact that their bodies are equipped with the ability to reproduce.  Just like the right to decide when you want to have sex, the right to decide when you become a parent is a matter of individual preference and self-determination.  Although it can certainly be argued that some people are not “fit” to raise children, this does not change the fact that it is a biological function that humans are born with the ability to perform.  There is no way to limit a person’s ability to reproduce without violating that person’s rights of control over his or her bodily functions.  Furthermore, there could be no unbiased criteria to determine who should be allowed to reproduce and who should not.  Having children is most certainly a right.  Each individual is responsible for determining if they are prepared to fulfill the obligations of this life choice.

If it was determined that reproduction was a privilege that should be controlled through screening and/or licensing, it would violate other standards that we currently hold about reproductive rights.  Right now, a person has a right to use contraceptives or to not; we also have the right to end a pregnancy or to proceed with it.  If we started telling people that they were not allowed to produce, we would in essence be requiring them to either abstain from sex or to use some sort of contraceptive.  At the very least, this would violate their rights to religious freedom.  On a very basic level, it would prohibit them from performing a natural function of their body.

Beside the fact that calling reproduction a “right” would violate one’s ability to make decisions about sexual preferences, it would also provide an unprecedented avenue for socioeconomic discrimination.  How would guidelines determine who is “fit” to be a parent?  There are many ways to be a good parent, and many perspectives on how this could be achieved.  A child can be mistreated or abused in any tax bracket; having enough money to raise a child could certainly not be the only determining factor.  How would we determine what aspects of an individual’s personality made them “fit” or “unfit” to fill the role of parent effectively?  Guidelines would likely be based primarily on one social group’s opinion, and would overemphasize economic status.

Children are abused, hungry, and neglected worldwide.  This goes to show that everyone that is capable of reproduction is not capable of taking care of the children they produce.  However, there is no concrete way to fairly prevent people from having children.  This stems from the basic fact that no matter what, reproduction is a biological function.  Just as we don’t try to control people’s ability to eat fattening foods or get enough exercise- even though it can be said that these things have a social impact based on a growing trend of obesity and higher numbers of diabetes cases- we should not try to control people’s ability to have children.  Each individual is responsible for their body and what they choose to do with it.  We cannot take that away, even if we do not like what some people choose to do with this power.

Learn more about this author, Jennifer Mcmillan.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.

No

by Rachelle Lang

Created on: November 09, 2010

Imagine being the eldest of 10 children born to a promiscuous mother, bearing the battle wounds of scars, bruises, and welts placed there by adults that frequent your house; cursed out by many, sexually abused by some.  You, barely escaping the ill fate of most of your siblings who were born cocaine exposed, with AIDS, or perhaps with both.  Imagine living in an existence where you had no control, where fear is relative and the feel of an extension cord tearing the skin from your back is normal.  Imagine having those that frequent your home, also frequent your bed room, zipping up their sins leaving you alone and desolate after dripping with the disgusting scent of their rape.  Now imagine escaping that reality only to be bounced from home to home like a used car that won’t sell.  Unfortunately these are the gruesome realities of some of our children in our foster care system.  Parents, many times have child after child subjected to egregious abuse.  Those children end up mentally ill, lost, runaways, or in the criminal justice system.  These parents should not be allowed to continue on in their pursuit to procreate. They need not continue the cycle of abuse.

I have worked as a clerk in the dependency court system for 8 years.  I've heard some of the vilest cases during my employment at the Juvenile Court house.  Children do not deserve to be born into a world that is going to neglect them.  Although procreation is a natural process, it should be done in a responsible manner.  Most of the children that are born to the parent's in question, were not born to people who were actively thinking of exercising some right, but due to gross negligence.  It doesn't make since for two people to be completely careless in their sexual escapades and bring forth children.

These babies, our greatest casualties, are born to parents whose rights are more important than their own life.  The human rights activists fight for the right to choose no matter what the cost.  It seems as if they care more about the right than they do the people with whose rights are in question.  A stay at home mother of two, S.L. (Initials are used to protect the source), paralleled court ordered birth control to abortion, “It is not pro-life, it is pro-choice”.  Most who take a stand in the issue of pro-choice argue for a woman to have the right to choose to do as she wishes with her body in regards to aborting a fetus.  S.L. used the pro-choice argument to state that a woman should have the right to choose to do as she sees fit with her body no matter what the circumstances may be.  She further proclaimed, “The government has no right to tell a woman what to do with her body”.  From the pro-choice point of view, it seems as if a parent has the right to: burden the taxpayers with their unwanted children, abuse their babies; and ingest cocaine into their child’s system.  H. P., a full case management supervisor, at the Miami-Dade Juvenile court house stated "Court imposed birth control should be considered as a choice against pregnancy, because it is reversible”.  Consider the case of Lamar, whose name has been changed for the use of this debate.  Lamar was the 8th out of eleven children.  He was born 2 months premature, and remained in an incubator for the first 6 months of his life.  The constant monitoring of the doctors never ceased even today, Lamar, now 12 cannot go a day without going into massive seizures due to his mother being on cocaine when she was carrying him.  Lamar doesn’t go to school with normal children for fear of his violent outbreaks.  He lashes out verbally and physically.  Safety precautions have to be followed constantly in the home for it is even unsafe to have his three year old sister near him, he hits her, too.  Lamar strikes out on those he loves, neighbors, other children, none escape Lamar’s wrath.  He feels justified.  At the age of 11 he was baker acted over 13 times.  His 12th birthday was no exception.  Off he went, into the back of an ambulance yet again.  Lamar’s mother lost the rights to 6 of her children prior to his conception.  Lamar is an example of an innocent child brought unnecessarily into this world.  He now has to deal with emotional scars for a lifetime; he has already begun to repeat the same cycle.  (Anonymous)  “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.” ((UHCHR Article 1)

We as a society need to stop allowing children to be born into this world who are doomed to fail; doomed to live in an existence that does not allow them to be the fittest; doomed to live with the memory of someone abusing and neglecting them; doomed to the fate that they too may end up repeating the same cycle that they grew up in; doomed to the jail systems; doomed to a life of poverty, homelessness, and hopelessness.  This drains our pockets as a society as a whole, and all should be outraged.  A public cry should go up, stating no more will these heartless abusers have the right to hurt another child, and no longer will these parents have a right to drain our tax budgets. It is time to hold them accountable, to contribute to society, and no longer shall they be allowed to stay home with their legs spread wide getting pregnant yet again.  It is time that we as a society put an end to the abuse of children, the abuse of the system, the abuse of welfare, and the abuse of the taxpayers.  It is time for us to stand united as a whole and cry 'we will no longer allow an abuser’s rights to trump that of a child nor that of our own.'


Learn more about this author, Rachelle Lang.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.


CONNECT WITH US

Read
our blog
Helum for writers

Write and get published
Share with other writers
Polish your freelancing skills

Join our active writing community
Helium Content Source for Publishers

Quality articles from proven freelancers
Exclusive rights, fast turnaround
Brand engagement, business blogging -- our writers do it all

Get custom content today!

INFORMATION


Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA