Search Helium

Home > Entertainment > Music > Music Genres, Trends & Scenes

Does society need super sexy music videos?

Results so far:

Yes
29% 148 votes Total: 518 votes
No
71% 370 votes

Yes

by Patrick Boniface

Created on: September 26, 2010

Does Society need super sexy music videos?

This is a perplexing question and one that needs to be analysed in great detail. It is all too easy to jump up onto the female led ultra liberal bandwagon and shout 'ban them', 'degrading to women', 'exploitative' and any number of other explosive adjectives that can be discovered on the pages of even a dim store thesaurus. Super sexy videos are a part of modern society, whether we like them or not. So perhaps the question should be one of how to control super sexy videos and to what extent they are censored. Remember though that is it not just women being used in these super sexy videos, men too are likely to appear in them stripped down showing off their quality oiled six pack and rippling muscles to the world.

"Sex sells!" It is that simple. Videos and the technology to make them have developed almost out of all comphrension to 1973 when the rock band Queen produced Bohemian Rhapsody - widely considered to be the world's first pop video. Admitttedly there is nothing really sexy about Freddie Mercury, John Deacon, Roger Taylor and Brian May in that video but in later ones, particularly for Bicycle Race there is the overt use of sex as a tool. In Bicycle Race naked young girls are cycling around a sports stadium after all.

To say that sexy videos are new is almost an insult to the intelligence - Lady GaGa may have taken it to the extreme with her latest bizarre behavour but almost every video ever made has some element of sex in it. Why? This is probably the easiest question to answer - because we as the human race are programmed by nature to procreate, to reproduce, to fornicate and to have fun. The birds and the bees do it and so do we.

Throughout history sexual attraction has driven the human race to greatness and it is not overstating the fact that without communial sex drive planet Earth would be a very different place today.

The use of super sexy music videos is simply an extension of modern society. In the past such activity was shrouded, hidden and frowned upon and anyone partaking in it was shunned and avoided. Today with new liberal laws we can celebrate it, engage in it and enjoy it. Whilst I cannot wholeheartedly agree with many of Lady Gaga's more bizarre antics - I can understand her motivation.

Learn more about this author, Patrick Boniface.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.

No

by Lawrence George

Created on: May 24, 2010   Last Updated: July 12, 2011

Once upon a time, society was outraged by the sight of Elvis Presley wiggling his hips.

Now, children regularly watch music videos with women in bikinis gyrating, rubbing something, or imitating sex with whoever is supposed to be singing the song. And no-one bats an eyelid.

The question of whether we need it misses the point: of course we don't need it. We don't need the iPhone either. But we're not driven by needs anymore - the relative affluence of the West, despite pockets of poverty, means that culturally we long ago stopped thinking about what we need, only what we want.

We clearly want these videos, because videos of tattooed women in bikinis climbing into the back of big cars with winking men are unbelievably popular.

Are they harmful? It's probably too soon to say. Statistically, there's unlikely to be any evidence linking these videos to anything.

But it can't do the fragile self-image of Western girls any good, can it? Here they are, already so worried and angry about their bodies that in the UK the single biggest issue teaching PE to girls is to get them to do it in the first place - and they turn on the tv to see plastic-enhanced, body-modified women all over it. Women with beautiful bodies, women with surgically improved bodies. Making ordinary girls feel even more inadequate and obsessed.

And what do they say about gender relations? You really do not have to be a feminist to see that even if they claim it is all cloaked in irony, or whatever stupid excuse they use nowadays, women acting as tools of men, there solely to be sexual - and nothing else, as in at least one Dizzee Rascal video, and the Benny Bennassi version of Satisfaction that Youtube reckons is too rude for under-18s - that these videos are simply exploiting women for money. Or rather, they are exploiting the female body and sending a powerful message both to teenage girls and to teenage boys that they are in a game of sexuality, where the woman is a toy, to be used and looked at.

In this most modern of "art" forms, we find ancient gender stereotypes hard at work. That cannot be doing anyone any good.

Finally, these videos are rubbish. They have no imagination, no originality, no concept of artistic endeavour. The director simply says - "here, darlin', put this bikini on and shake it about a bit". Probably. There's the expense of filming in Californian mansions or Caribbean paradises to cover, after all.  What is there that is good, thoughtful, humane, thought-provoking about any of this? That doesn't mean it should be banned of course - it should not - but it doesn't mean it should be guaranteed an audience.

We don't need these super sexy videos. Should they exist at all? It's a free country. Should we ignore them and leave them to rot, until the record companies decide to make something more intelligent? Definitely.

Learn more about this author, Lawrence George.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.


CONNECT WITH US

Read
our blog
Helum for writers

Write and get published
Share with other writers
Polish your freelancing skills

Join our active writing community
Helium Content Source for Publishers

Quality articles from proven freelancers
Exclusive rights, fast turnaround
Brand engagement, business blogging -- our writers do it all

Get custom content today!

INFORMATION


Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA