Join | Log in

Channel Button
Debate_icon

Society & Lifestyle   >

Political Values

Get a Widget for this title

Should people be punished for wrongful thoughts?

Results so far:

Yes
7% 2 votes Total: 28 votes
No
93% 26 votes
Yes

My father in his own way was a huge advocate of "discipline, and yet he was not very much of a disciplinarian. I was always left to my own devices and years later when he told me he "raised" me to be the person I am today, I had to recoil, and tell him that to my mind he hadn't raised me at all, that, ever since I was a child, I basically raised myself. He just grinned at me and said: "And that did the trick."

I was inclined to be argumentative, but something in the complete lunacy of that statement made me stop, and think. And of course, isn't that the point? Once again my father had disciplined me without having to try very hard- and there I was again, paused and contemplative, and of course thinking before I spoke- thinking before I acted.

Without getting too deep into the reasons why we are as we are, it is common knowledge at this point that our consciousness is actually a very small portion of our actual brain activity at any given moment. The rest is impulse, and our centers for impulse vary from affection to violence. The question 'should people be punished from wrongful thoughts?' is actually a very easy one to answer. Of course we should. Lets talk about why.

We all know about Pavlov and classical conditioning. What we perhaps don't grasp fully is that our brains are affected the same way a dog's is at the smell of meat. We salivate, if mentally, to self fulfilling stimuli. You might ask how a wrongful thought could be self fulfilling, and you'd be asking a good question. The answer is in another under-appreciated fact- our thoughts follow our emotions. Beyond that, our thoughts validate our emotions. My emotional response to being ignored is to get angry, and in order to maintain my state of anger my mind begins firstly to summon relevant memories that make me even angrier, IE this isn't the first time this has happened, this isn't the first time this person ignored me, and then, of course, my mind begins to summon irrelevant memories in order to fuel the anger, IE Some guy cut me off in traffic this morning, so I didn't need this today. The procession of thoughts gets less and less about what is the actual trigger for what you feel, and more and more about why you should be feeling it. And then, a miracle happens, my thoughts begin to affect my actions, and of course then my actions begin to bring about situations which also validate my emotional state. Now that I was ignored by this person, I'm going to ignore that person, and suddenly I'm mad at just about everyone and everyone is no doubt mad at me, and no doubt they are now going through the same process as I am. As my father was NOT known to say, but claims to this day to have taught me, all of that could have been avoided with just a little bit of discipline, and because actions follow emotions, and because emotions are catalyzed by the types of thoughts we allow ourselves to have, discipline does not begin with actions. Discipline begins in our own thoughts.

There should be and is a punishment for wrongful thoughts, just as there should be and is a punishment for wrongful actions towards others, because in essence, they are identical. The punishment for wrongful thoughts invariably is a wrongful action, so my condition to the justification of punishment is that before the action ever has a chance to take place, mentally punish yourself for having the thoughts, and use Pavlov's conditioning to discipline yourself. Emotions themselves are addictive, and since our thoughts are linked so closely to them, it is possible to become addicted to thinking wrongly.

Learn more about this author, John Winter.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.

No

No, people should not be punished for their thoughts.

What needs to be analyzed is this:

1.Who thinks the thought, and why?

2.What harm is caused by merely thinking the thought, but not acting upon it?

3.How is one to know what someone else thought is really what they thought?

4.Who is to administer the punishment?

5.Who determines "acceptable" content, and what is considered punishable?

6.Why should someone by punished by merely thinking a thought and not acting upon it?

7.If merely entertaining an idea keeps one's fantasy active, while keeping the reality (action) from happening, is this a bad thing?

and finally:

8.If the fantasy is entertained, and not acted on, if someone is allowed to punish another for the fantasy, what negative consequences will come from the emotional apparatus of fantasist?

These are just a few of the problems off the top of my head, and there would be probably many more had I entertained such a tyrannical mindset. I do not sidestep the word tyranny-anybody who would advocate "yes" is advocating that (whether they realize it or not).

A main theme in Orwell's book "1984" is tyranny through the control of language. Without giving too much away for those who have not read the book, the propaganda used phrases such as "War is Peace". Since there is no word to describe actual peace, a nation always at war can delete meaning in the vernacular and thus change language so much that there's no concept of what peace is or could ever mean.

Such would be the case if bad thoughts were made punishable. One would have no way to express emotion, no anger, hatred, or any negative emotion that is healthy toward living life. The writer of the only "Yes" article had explained humans by using Pavlov's behaviorist methodology. I will concede that emotions and thoughts will often overlap. Few thoughts actually become action, and actions have reasons behind them (whether or not their rational or rationalized). But for the times they do not overlap, should someone be punished? I'd hope not.

Let's apply this to a practical situation: If you're in traffic and the person in front of you suddenly slams the brakes (forcing you to), or cuts you off-if you think "What a #^@*" should you be punished for that? What if you get short-changed by a cashier? Should you give up thinking? Whether you're correct or not isn't the issue...what is is that your emotions matter, and the fact that you're ripped off justifies feeling bad in that moment. Most people won't actually kill the other person, and that's a good thing. Wanting to kill the other person for that moment isn't a bad thing, it's a rational emotion.

Punishment is reserved only for those who deserve it. The two people I just mentioned are those that would or wouldn't kill someone based on being ripped off. Those who would take action to hurt the other person physically are deserving of punishment because that is actual harm, not potential. In fact, punishing people who think wrong would lead many more of them to actually take out their rage. After all, since they're going to be punished, they might as well go all the way...


Learn more about this author, A.T. Meininger.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10

What is Helium? | Buy Web Content | Contact Us | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA | User Tools | Help | Community | Helium’s Official Blog | Link to Helium

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA