Worse

by Gary C. Gibson

Created on: December 23, 2009

Some of the ancients believed the world was running down-getting worse with each generation. Thermodynamically the universe is running down into disorder from a low state of entropy to a high state. What do we mean though by 'worse'? Is the world getting worse from each generation to the next?

The natural resource are becoming worse. Biodiversity is getting worse with thousands of species exterminated annually. The world is becoming more polluted so much so that whales and other marine mammals absorb it in their blubber and pass it on to young ones crashing the species in some cases. Even  human beings have a cocktail of chemicals in their bodies that are industrial wastes and so forth. We can put our heads in the sand and ignore it all of course.

If one enjoys wilderness then things are getting worse. Alaska has the state legislature spending money to propagandize in favor of Arctic offshore oil drilling for Shell or against the endangered species act's set aside of real estate. If all that matters to promote the good of the world is more oil and shag carpets, big box homes and weapons production then the world is getting better.

The world is such a large category and a sizable place-can it be getting generally worse each year instead of better in most ways. or in too many significant ones? Jacque Cousteau said the3 world had about 200 years of time to go before the resource destruction would doom us all. The creator of the modern Gaia hypothesis believes in about 300 years natural climate change disasters will wipeout most human life as it presently exists. If these are true time clocks is the world getting better or worse from generation to generation?The industrial era since the 19th century has spewed hundreds of billions of tons of pollutants into the world. The ocean alone is about half-way along in its carrying capacity for the sequestration of CO2.  The ocean itself has been a dumping place/sink for toxic wastes for all that time as well. Even human food production consumes about 2/3rds of the continental land areas in human use. Population growth beyond the present scale would require vast new good areas to cultivate that don't exist, and perhaps more strict government guidelines for growth? Is any of that a getting better scenario?

If the humanity continues to have success in inventing new technologies are they even needed to sustain life? Isn't a substantial percent of technological progress given not to bring people up from a desperate condition but simply to replace existing functional technology with better? Much of the better technology simply creates resource waste-not much of it is devoted to durability, not even in the high-impact transportation industry.The stainless steel DeLorean car brought a spark of novelty to the industry before he was convicted of illegal drug sales. 
Our society has a disposability ethic that values accelerating growth and throughput to increase profit. Since the profit process creates resource waste its fundamentally irrational-is that better? If an economy must expand through disposable processes year after year to exist is that intelligent? Mustn’t a stable,  no-growth policy be designed that conserves resources on a planet of finite size such as is the Earth?

One day scalar field planetary expansions may be possible. An artificial planet could be a thousand miles in diameter or a million as is needed, with extra mass drawn from virtual particle field resources such as may have provided proximal sustenance for the flash-bang of the Universe inflation at frequencies spoken by God It is fairly plain that the day may be far off and even never arrive if each generation is subjecte3d to increasing social pressures to destroy individualism and function as a part of a world-hive of bio-mass units of individuality moved by machines.

Its easy enough to consider a world moving toward dystopia in many ways, and that is why the relative harmless to the world relation of mankind in former times a thousand or more years ago has appeal as a better area. While the improvement of medical technology is good-what else is really better? Is a kindle book reader better than a parchment scroll aesthetically to one with good health McClure described in his sailing mission for a Northwest Passage search expedition? Were women worse in former times than today? Is virtue better or worse today than in former eras?
Some years the world improves in some ways, in other years it worsens. It is hard to imagine that ancient mankind ever accomplished the kind of mass homicides such as were achieved in the 20th century on several occasions. We have yet to have our first of this millennium although the Darfur genocide may qualify. The prospects of even worse mega-deaths through organizational power obviously exist bellow the surface of social potential as the mass organizational approach to repression of competition and liberty may again surface to erase its targets of convenience from history. They will all be polluted and on short rations anyway with the leaders consuming resources conspicuously as leaders ‘deserve‘.

Learn more about this author, Gary C. Gibson.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.