Search Helium

Home > Entertainment > Music > Musicians & Bands

Who was the better Van Halen lead singer: David Lee Roth or Sammy Hagar?

Results so far:

Roth
71% 463 votes Total: 654 votes
Hagar
29% 191 votes

Roth

by sir jorge a orduna

Created on: June 02, 2011   Last Updated: January 13, 2012

There is no doubt that Van Halen has gone through some major ups and downs, but none can argue that Sammy Hagar was better than David Lee Roth. The argument is tired at this point, but people still seem to want to try and make an argument out of the matter. The truth is that Roth created a far better rock star role than Hagar ever could or will. Consider the following three reasons why Roth wins in the battle of the Van Halen singers.

First and foremost, who was there first? The first major record from the mighty metal band had Roth jumping across all sorts of stages to bring live shows to anyone that would listen. This sort of frenetic pacing, loud mouth antics, and vocal delivery created such a buzz that it put the band on the map. From the debut release through several tours and major music videos, it was obvious that while the band had some great musical chops, it was Roth, as the energetic front man, that pulled the package together.

When you think about rock stardom, wild antics, women, drugs, and booze, you think of David Lee Roth. Roth is a wild man, and continually pushes the boundaries of what a rock star can and has done. From crazy demands backstage, to a tour bus full of groupies, the man is a rock legend for vocals and bedding women. Hagar might get his fair share of women, but when you think rock god, you think Roth not Hagar.

The reunion shows that Van Halen pulls together in modern times have David Lee Roth on the stage, and it doesn’t look like he’s lost a step. Yes, he’s older, yes he has his problems with the band, but if you look at the live performance you can’t deny that he makes sure that the fans get their money’s worth. No matter how tiring it is, when “Hot For Teacher”, “Jump”, and “Running With The Devil” hit, Roth is a mad man and it’s easy to see why fans pay good money to see him front the mighty Van Halen.

If nothing else, the 1980’s wouldn’t have yielded so many wild front men, if it weren’t for the example that was set by one David Lee Roth. He put the front man persona up front, while Eddie Van Halen shredded on the guitar, and that’s why he’s better than Hagar.

Learn more about this author, sir jorge a orduna.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.

Hagar

by Ryan Gray

Created on: February 23, 2011

As a fan of Van Halen’s music for three decades, it took some time to reach a verdict on this one. So many classic tunes are generated just by the band’s name.

In the end the wording of the question made the decision: “Who was the better SINGER?” We’re not talking about which man the band had more success with or which man had more classic songs with the band. The better singer in this case is the Red Rocker, Sammy Hagar. He could sing fast songs or slow songs – loud or soft; and he didn’t need any talking or yelling mixed in.

There is no doubt Roth was a better entertainer. He could perform in front of people and cameras for hours. And he could run full speed, jump up in the air, do the splits, bounce around, and lots of other things to keep people entertained.

But consider some of the classic hits the band had with Hagar – “Dreams”, “Black and Blue”, “When It’s Love”, “Poundcake”. Those songs would not have had the same level of success with Roth’s deeper, yet flamboyant sound. And Diamond Dave’s vocal range wasn’t the same as Sammy’s.

While many Van Halen fans argue that the band’s early music was its best, there are several of the early classics that would have been big hits even if Hagar had the microphone. Tunes such as “Runnin’ With the Devil”, “Ain’t Talkin’ ‘bout Love”, “And the Cradle Will Rock”, and “Dance the Night Away” were destined to be all-time favorites.

The main reason for that was the work of Eddie Van Halen on guitar. He was ultra-talented, and it was impossible not to notice those talents during the first 10 years of the band’s existence. That is why so many fans salute the early years with Roth as Van Halen’s finest.

But as Roth himself told everyone, “Life goes on without me.”

Many music historians and even fans of the group insist that Van Halen with Roth and Van Halen with Hagar were two completely different bands. And there was nothing wrong with that. Van Hagar, as they are often referred to, still had some hard-rocking songs. But there were more love songs, more synthesizers and fewer guitar solos. The band went from an angry rebellion to a big party.

It seems that any stage of Hagar’s career could be described using those last three words. And while this particular party didn’t produce any number-one singles, there were plenty of memorable tunes for fans to enjoy.

“Say boys. That might just call for a toast.”

Both versions of Van Halen produced a volume of classic songs that many people can remember by heart. And they can probably recall certain things they were doing with those songs playing in the background. But when matched up note-for-note, the singing was better at “Cabo Wabo” than “Panama”.

Learn more about this author, Ryan Gray.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.


CONNECT WITH US

Read
our blog
Helum for writers

Write and get published
Share with other writers
Polish your freelancing skills

Join our active writing community
Helium Content Source for Publishers

Quality articles from proven freelancers
Exclusive rights, fast turnaround
Brand engagement, business blogging -- our writers do it all

Get custom content today!

INFORMATION


Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA