Arts & Humanities >
Internet Writing & Blogging
Get a Widget for this title
RSS Feed
Should bloggers be held to the same code of ethics as professional journalists?
Should bloggers be held to the same code of ethics as professional journalists?
Title endorsed in part by:
Results so far:
| Yes | 61% | 151 votes | Total: 248 votes | |
| No | 39% | 97 votes |
Yes
Write now
Print
Invite a writer™
Add to FavoritesIn answering yes I made an assumption. I assume that the bloggers we are talking about are the professional news bloggers who are trying to have an influence in society and to report news faster then any other media outlet can. I am assuming that we are not referring to Judy down the street blogging about her grandkids or the best recipe for white fish goulash. Professional bloggers should be held to the same journalistic standards as professional journalists for the simple reason that they are trying to be professional journalists.
Journalists are held to standards for a reason. With what they report, they can affect the outcome of elections, change the paths of traffic, force accountability on corporations and companies. They can also destroy people's lives.
When a reporter reports something that is unsavory, disgusting or otherwise unaccepted in society, they have forced that person into the role of a pariah. If this reporting is untrue, then that person is forced through a unique kind of hell. One where they are innocent of a crime that they haven't been truly accused of, found innocent, and yet that innocence rarely changes the perception of the first report. There is a reason that mudslinging works in a political campaign. Even if it is untrue, they are relying on the first impression that the mud splattering all over the figure causes. With this power it is very important to hold them to standards that minimize the damage they do when mistakes are made. They are human, after all, and will make a mistake eventually.
Another reason to hold bloggers to a journalistic standard is to increase their credibility. Often I will hear a piece of information from an associate, ask them where thy heard it, and immediately discard it as useless or untrue when they answer, "I read it on a blog." Unless the blogger is a known journalist with a credible publication, it is just about impossible to take them seriously. It's a side effect of the Internet wave. When every Tom, Dick and Harry can start up and run a blog, then who's to say that this Tom is Tom Brokaw and not Tom Glavine? By holding professional bloggers to a higher standard, we can at least believe that they are following good journalistic practices, you know, like verifying sources and not reporting gossip.
In summation, if a blogger wants to be taken seriously as a source of news and information, then they need to be held to the same standards as all of our sources of information. To hold them to a lower standard devalues the effect they can have and seriously throws their honesty into question. After all, wouldn't an honest journalist want to be held to the same standards he holds others to?
Learn more about this author, Troy Gardner.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
No
Ethics which apply to professional journalists are vastly different than those imposed upon bloggers. A blog is usually one's personal reflection and opinion. A newspaper or magazine would most likely edit, cut and place such writings in an unprofessional section such as "letters" or "personals". Freedom of speech is a wonderful right and privilege by which many bloggers flourish or flounder. Joe Six-Pack cannot be expected to understand nor adhere to the complexities of editorial integrity which regulate professional writers who work for the media. Blogging was meant to be a way of freely expressing one's feelings unedited and uncensored like a diary or journal; however, any federal, state or city applicable laws should apply because bloggers are posting their thoughts for others to read.
Professional journalists have to adhere to specific code books on how to present their writings, for example, using politically correct terminology or consistent governmental acronyms. Bloggers are not required to follow those rules or guidebooks.
Professional journalists have a team of lawyers or administrators who oversee their work in order to protect against slander, libel, copyright infringement or anything which would imply inappropriateness. Bloggers would be unfamiliar with the regulations which guide ethical professional writing. Ignorance is not an excuse if they are bullying or causing harm to others, but the bar would definitely be set much lower for quality and content and most readers would likely expect much less from them. Unfortunately, courtesy and morality cannot be legislated. Even when a pro posts on a controversial topic, the comments that tag along for the ride can often be incredibly insensitive.
Professional journalists are being paid by others for their work. This would imply some kind of oversight of the work or consensus or agreement as to how the work is presented by the host. Bloggers are writing simply for the joy of expression and will most likely endure the wrath of their own subscribers and critics on their own dime. Feedback can be ruthless for those without reputation or who do not care about whatever reputation they are reaping.
Both professional journalists and bloggers have names to protect. Everything which gets posted online has the ability to pop up in the most unexpected places depending upon the "tags" or "leads" they use to describe or advertise their writings. For this reason, I would caution both kinds of writers to think twice when creating headlines or even posting comments since your reply will be piggybacked to the original material or source for a long time to come. Rereading and editing one's material periodically even blogs are a good idea.
Make sure your profile, pictures, tone, attitude and genre are what you want the world to see. The world might be more forgiving of a journal entry about mundane and boring topics than they would a professional journalist's obligation to the truth and accuracy of a news report, but remember, the court of public opinion especially on the internet has its own way of being self-governing so that bad, rude or downright offensive and mean material usually ends up being unread and ignored.
Obscurity and lack of an audience of readers are the bloggers' and professional journalists' worse nightmares. Anonymous writers are neither brave nor brilliant. If what one has to say is significant enough to publish, it deserves authorship and readership.
Learn more about this author, Cinda Smaagaard.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Difference of opinion? Debate now.
- Internet Writing & Blogging
- Should you quit your day job to blog?
- Is using an academic ghost writer dishonest?
