Search Helium

Home > Pets & Animals > Animal Rights & Issues

Should penalties for animal cruelty be more severe?

Results so far:

Yes
93% 346 votes Total: 373 votes
No
7% 27 votes

Yes

by Rachael Joseph

Created on: August 22, 2009   Last Updated: August 23, 2009

Penalties for animal cruelty should absolutely be more severe. I worked as a veterinary technician for fifteen years and this is one of the reasons I am no longer in the field. More than half of my career as a technician was spent in emergency rooms and some of the things I am going to share may be shocking.

One evening working the overnight shift at an emergency hospital, a Labrador came in with a ruptured spleen. The dog was bleeding out internally and required numerous transfusions and an immediate splenectomy to save its life. What could have ruptured this dog's spleen? As it turned out, this black lab was a little too happy to see his owner when he arrived home from work and without the proper training, was jumping up and down with excitement at seeing his favorite person enter the front door. Rather than pet Fido after a long and frustrating day or simply walk away from the dog who adored him but was being a tad boisterous, the dog's owner delivered a sharp kick to the abdomen that ruptured his spleen. Can you imagine the force of the kick that could rupture a young, healthy animal's internal organs? What's worse is that after the corrective surgery, we had to let the dog go home with the same owner who put him there. Had it been up to me, our state laws would have allowed us to call the police and toss this guy in jail for what he'd done, require him to take anger management courses and re-home the dog with an owner who would never lay a finger on him.

Another shift in a different emergency room, a husky covered with blood from snout to tail arrived. He was non-responsive. His owner had decided the dog needed to lose some weight and tied him to the rear bumper of his car for a little exercise. When the dog could run no more, the owner either didn't notice or didn't care that he was dragging his husky from the rear of his car. When the dog's skin had nearly slipped his body, he brought him to us. There was no surgery or procedure that could fix this poor, tortured animal who had just been through hours of hellish suffering and at least we were able to humanely euthanize him. The owner walked out the door without paying the bill. He probably wanted to save his money for a new dog, this is a regular pattern.

The worst cruelty and neglect case I'd ever seen came only weeks later when a neighbor brought in a dog she thought was dead. When she went into the neighbor's yard to check on the matted, emaciated cocker spaniel, it took a breath. She brought it in to us as a good Samaritan and tried to help us contact the owners-a couple of Realtors who were out of town for a convention. They had left the pet they'd adopted and were supposed to be responsible for tethered in the backyard, without food or water in the summer heat. The dog's blood sugar was so low it wasn't compatible with life and as I began to shave the dog's leg to place an IV catheter, I noticed maggots crawling out of every orifice. They were coming out of the eyes, nose and anus of the dog. This poor cocker spaniel was literally being eaten inside out. I called the police and they arrived shortly to take photos. We infused dextrose to raise the dog's blood sugar but he wouldn't eat and again, there was no saving this poor, neglected animal. All we needed was a verbal phone authorization from the owner to two separate hospital employees to put this dog to sleep. The owner learned the police were present and continued to play games with us, prolonging the suffering of the animal. We couldn't move the dog without causing intense pain so all we could do was give him large doses of pain medication and pray the owner would give us the authorization we needed for legal reasons as soon as possible. This owner let us all watch the dog live, being ingested alive for hours before we finally got our verbal consent to euthanize the cocker spaniel. Veterinary professionals rarely cry but in this situation, we did and so did the police. The couple was summoned to court and ordered to pay a small fine for what had happened that day. He had a new cocker spaniel by then.

Ideally, there would be a system that not only punishes these neglectful, abusive owners with jail time but also prevents them from getting new pets. They need to be ordered to take some sort of animal husbandry course through their local humane society as well. A database needs to be established through breeders, humane societies and pounds that prevents these neglectful people from owning another pet again.

Learn more about this author, Rachael Joseph.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.

No

by Masked Human

Created on: June 28, 2009

As an owner of pets myself, I would like to press that I am completely against all forms of animal cruelty and will never tolerate or accept any actions that violate pets. With that said, I believe that there should not be a more severe form of punishment or penalty towards those that do commit animal cruelty. And here are a few reasons as to why I perceive the sentence is already severe as it is today.

If you have taken law, whether it be through high school or even law school, you know that when charged with any form of an indictable or even sometimes summary offence, it is kept on your record. Not only do you have to pay a consequence for your actions deemed by a judge, you now have a record that identifies you as an offender. Do you realize how severe that is alone? If you aren't sure what problems that can cause for an individual here it is. Whether you apply for a job or seek a job, you will more than likely be turned down immediately without a full review. Why? Employer's, and people in charge of hiring potential workers review your resume like a police would a suspect. And guess what, your criminal record is one thing they do review. If you have been charged with animal cruelty and found guilty in a court, you will have to live with the fact that you now have to also forfeit a job opportunity because of your actions. More severe than this is seeking revenge against those that possibly deserve to learn from their mistakes and past wrongs.

As a Canadian, and an individual who has studied law I have seen how our legal system works with criminals and offenders who commit these types of crimes. And as a person entering this, I was always saying "guilty" instead of seeing the other side of this system. I personally came to the conclusion that I was not realizing how much of an impact these penalties actually have on people who must face them. Most say the common thing for people who commit crimes and even animal cruelty and it's, " just a slap on the wrist." Replace slap with chain and you have the right picture. Sometimes the chains can be from prison, and after it is the chain of consequence that is held on your record now forever(unless Judge deems otherwise).

But what if it is too severe? What happens if it was my pet that hurt or harmed by someone else? Would I change my opinion? Absolutely not, a judge will determine sentencing and they decide what is best for the guilty party and for society itself. More severe is a personal vendetta against all criminals, leaning towards an outside issue. Should penalties be more severe? No, and I will continue to support the laws already in place, and allow people an act of forgiveness and redemption for the wrongs in life.

Learn more about this author, Masked Human.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.


CONNECT WITH US

Read
our blog
Helum for writers

Write and get published
Share with other writers
Polish your freelancing skills

Join our active writing community
Helium Content Source for Publishers

Quality articles from proven freelancers
Exclusive rights, fast turnaround
Brand engagement, business blogging -- our writers do it all

Get custom content today!

INFORMATION


Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA