My Helium | Join | Log in Where Knowledge Rules

Politics, News & Issues:

US Politics

Debate_icon

RSS RSS Feed

Get a Widget for this title

Did President Obama's speech in Cairo launch a 'new beginning' in relations between Muslims and the U.S.?

Results so far:

Yes
45% 56 votes Total: 125 votes
No
55% 69 votes
Yes

"I have come here to seek a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world, one based upon mutual interest and mutual respect," President Obama said on June 4th, in his historical speech at Cairo University. The speech addressed Muslim grievances against the United States and stressed the need for joint actions to deal with the issues of extreme violence, nuclear weapons proliferation, democracy, women's rights, rights to exist for both the Israel and Palestine, and freedom of religion. It is a new beginning as the speech was based on universal truths, and was the first time for many to see that a U.S. President spoke with a vision, a strong passion, confidence, and in a conciliatory manner.

How to evaluate whether this speech launched a 'new beginning' with respect to relations between Muslims, and the United States? First and foremost, the image created by President Obama in Cairo seems important for building trust between the United States and the Muslim world. Second, it is necessary to look at what elements of the speech would help to lay foundation of a new beginning. Third, it is important to discuss the immediate reactions of the general public, comments by organizations, and academia, and politicians, to understand how the speech was immediately felt.

Obama can be considered as a multi-cultural expression, transcending various cultures, though he is an American born citizen. His father was rooted in generations of Muslims in Kenya; his mother was a well educated woman from the Midwest; he himself spent his childhood in Indonesia, a densely populated Muslim country. Part of his name, Hussein, means a prominent person in Shiite Islam, and it is a royal name in Jordan. The city of Obama is a capital of Wakasa Province, in Japan, where Wakasa people danced in streets when Barak Obama became the President of the United States. Collin Powell a great Republican, once said "Obama is a transformational figure coming on to the world stage. His thinking, as emerged from the Cairo Speech, transcends cultures. His multi-cultural expression made him unique, and developed a new image unlike, particularly, the former administration.

Obama commenced his speech by saying Sallam-Al-Ekum (peace be with you),and it gave the theme at the beginning for his speech. He said that America and Islam are not exclusive to each other, and need not be in competition. He validated this argument showing how he perceived the Muslim culture, differently from former administration, and how Muslims contributed to knowledge expansion and technology development. He reminded that the first country to accept the Union was Morocco, a Muslim country. In addition, he reminded how Muslims contributed to develop U.S. to its present status referring to how Muslims contributed in business development, industry, fighting wars, serving government, excelling in sports, and involving in education and presenting a religious diversity with seven million Muslims living in the United States.

The religious perspectives on peace, truth, he mentioned at the speech would be hard to ignore by any religion or political organization. Obama quoted the Holly Bible, Holly Quran, and Talmud to remind how religions looked at peace and the truth. Quoting from Holly Quran he said that it tells us to "Be conscious of God and speak always the truth." He qualified himself saying that was the humble task he was trying to do. He showed how Quran tells about peace; 'We have made you into nations and tribes so that you may know one another; He quoted Talmud;The whole of the Torah is for the purpose of promoting peace; and, he further, quoted The Holy Bible: 'Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.' He said that the people of the world can live together in peace. We know that is God's vision. Referring to violent extremism, he quoted Holly Quran again; "whoever kills an innocent, it is as if he has killed all mankind; and whoever saves a person, it is as if he has saved all mankind. The seven issues he talked about were based on religious values and norms of Islam, Christianity, and Judaism, and other universal truths. He pointed to the areas where partnerships could be build and find solutions, and highlighted the need to focus on the present, and not the unpleasant and divisive past. His universal visions laid foundation for new beginning, no doubt, if continued with policy prescriptions, and actions by all involved.

There were mixed reactions to his speech. A Saudi Islamic preacher Shaykb al-Qarni said it was "the greatest speech heard from a Western ruler and should be taken in good faith." The Head of the PLO organization Saeh Erckat said the speech was historic and should take the advantage of the speech. Israel, Deputy Prime Minister introduced his speech as an expression to create a better world, one which is ruled by principle of justice, progress and democracy (CBS News). As Fawaz A Gerges, a Pakistani Scholar has said Obama's speech in Cairo "offered a powerful contrarian paradigm to that of Bin Laden and reminded his Muslim audience that the relationship between Islam and the Christian West includes centuries of coexistence and cooperation, not just conflicts and religious wars"(Daily Times, Pakistan). The head of the Organization of the Islamic Conference, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, said Obama's speech was a "declaration of good will" that will help win hearts in the Muslim world. The Hamas leader in Damascus, Syria, Khaled Meshaal praised the speech, but looked for concrete actions. There were also negative comments toward the speech. Iranian and Hezbollah representatives criticized the speech saying that it was an empty talk. For some it was a sermon, and to others it was an American necessity as the balance of power is changing from West to the Asian region.

Following Obama's speech on June 4, Israeli's support for the two-state solution increased slightly from 59 percent to 63 percent according to a poll, which was conducted by the Harry S.Truman Research Institute for the Advancement of Peace at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. The poll showed Obama's speech had a great impact on Israeli's expectations, as to the chances for a final settlement with the Palestinians and for the establishment of a Palestinian state, as reported by China View.

President Obama has laid a powerful foundation to develop positive American-Islam relationships in the Arab World, as well as in rest of the Muslim world. He presented a unique multi-cultural expression, that many Muslims accepted, a quality no other American President had in the past. In the mean time it raised many expectations in the Muslim world, where clear policy prescriptions, and follow-up actions are immediately required.

Learn more about this author, Don Patrick Amarasinghe.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.

No

The mainstream press has heralded Barak Obama's "ground-breaking new Mid-East policy," delivered in Cairo, Egypt (June 2009). Yet, a close examination of Obama's text in comparison to major foreign policy addresses by his predecessor, former President George W. Bush, suggests otherwise. When it comes to US policy in the Middle East, the transition from the George W. Bush to Barak Obama was not so much a change of horses as a change of riders.

Obama is still riding the same ole Mid-East policy horse that his predecessor Bush rode, though each tend to lean toward different sides (Bush, no doubt, right and Obama left). Or is it that those flanking these leaders only view them from one side or the other? If you stand in front - and assess actions and words - you'll find more similarities than differences. These similarities prove that Obama is not "launching a new beginning" in US policy six months into his presidency; instead, he's simply repackaging the same old message.

Wars

Wars in Afghanistan and Iraq continue, along with building tensions in Iran. Bush may have said more about US concerns than Obama, but both claim to support the troops abroad. No troops have yet to come home, nor have agreements been signed moving troops homeward. And no differences in the rhetoric either.

Here's what Obama said in his Cairo speech about the War on Terror (June 2009): "[W]e should [not] ignore sources of tension...[W]e must face these tensions squarely. The first issue that we have to confront is violent extremism in all of its forms...America can never tolerate violence by extremists, we must never alter our principles."

Six months earlier, Bush delivered his last speech as president. He declared: "We are engaged in the defining ideological struggle of the 21st century. The terrorists oppose every principle of humanity and decency that we hold dear. Yet in this war on terror, there is one thing we and our enemies agree on: In the long run, men and women who are free to determine their own destinies will reject terror and refuse to live in tyranny .That is why the terrorists are fighting to deny this choice to people in Lebanon, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the Palestinian Territories. And that is why, for the security of America and the peace of the world, we are spreading the hope of freedom."

Less details for Obama and more specific countries and struggles named by Bush, but the sentiments expressed remain eerily parallel. Also remember: both presidents have said they want to bring the troops home, but just not quite yet.

Religions

Bush openly proclaims himself a Christian. Obama plays a wishy-washy middle ground, sometimes acknowledging his Christian mother and sometimes referencing his African Muslim father. US Editor for the UK Telegraph, Toby Hardin, suggests Obama only pulls out his Hussein middle name when he ventures abroad; he counts three references in Obama's 2009 travels to the Middle East and Europe.

Both Bush and Obama draw distinctions between the Islamic faith which is peace-loving, from Islamic terrorists who distort the Muslim faith. Bush even caught flack from protestant Christians for saying such. When Obama mimics this dichotomy his supporters herald a brand new era in US-Muslim relations. Must be the view from that left side of the President's horse.

Freedom

Bush spoke endlessly about everyone's "God-given right" to freedom. The London Telegraph quoted Bush: "I do say that freedom is the Almighty's gift to every person. I also condition it by saying freedom is not America's gift to the world. It's much greater than that, of course. And I believe we worship the same god."

Here's what Obama said in his "ground-breaking" Cairo speech: "The United States has been one of the greatest sources of progress that the world has ever known. We were born out of revolution against an empire. We were founded upon the ideal that all are created equal...Freedom in America is indivisible from the freedom to practice one's religion."

Bush identifies the source of freedom in God, while Obama references a secular origin in the American Revolution and founding US documents. But both trump the same rhetoric of freedom and equality.

Culture Vultures

When Bush announced the War in Iraq in March of 2003 he stated: "We come to Iraq with respect for its citizens, for their great civilization and for the religious faiths they practice." Obama has been praised extensively for saying the same thing six years later in his Cairo speech: "As a student of history, I also know civilization's debt to Islam."

Clearly, both men recognize the rich historical legacy of the Middle Eastern peoples. No "new beginning there."

In conclusion, the similarities in Bush's major Mid-East policy speeches and this first of Obama's in Cairo sound more similar than different. And if only the riders have changed and they seem to be trotting the same US Mid-East policy course, how do we explain the headlines heralding this "new policy" of Obama's in the Mid-East in this "ground-breaking" Cairo speech? As the old nursery rhyme warns: "If wishes were horses..."

For more information:

Text of Obama's Cairo Speech (June 2009)

Bush Announces War on Iraq (May 2003)

Bush's Final Address as President (January 2009)

Learn more about this author, Babs Pomp.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.

What is Helium? | Buy Web Content | Contact Us | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA | User Tools | Help | Community | Helium’s Official Blog | Link to Helium

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA