Home > Society & Lifestyle > Morals, Values & Norms > Social Values & Norms
Results so far:
| Yes | 42% | 169 votes | Total: 401 votes | |
| No | 58% | 232 votes |
Yes
Created on: May 07, 2009 Last Updated: May 13, 2009
When I look around at the things people are accepting these days I wonder what in the world has happened to the days when people used to have strong beliefs in right from wrong... It saddens me that the morals of people all around are quickly disappearing. The one thing I never thought I would see disappear is the respect people had for others. You helped your neighbor, you did not try to make things worse for them. You brought your kids up with respect for themselves and marriage. Not anymore..
I could sit back, like most, and say this is normal teen behavior, but it is not. In my parents day teens didn't do that. Yes kids will be kids and they will mess up but there used to be a line that wasn't crossed. Parents have forgotten to teach their kids respect for other people, for themselves, and for marriage. It seems by the time a parent gets around to having "the talk" with their kids it is already to late.
I also believe the media plays a big role in the way a teen thinks. The media is all about sex. It has gotten so bad even the commercials are about sex. It is even spreading crudeness into cartoons. Sex is made out as a casual things that all people do or should be doing. You see womens bodies everywhere now, the more skin the more who will go look at it. Although I think when it comes to sexting the ones who do it aren't out to expose themselves to everyone and that is why it becomes so hurtful to the one who does it. They may be in a relationship and have that much trust in the person they send it to, that trust shouldn't be broken.
Then you have your teens who really just don't care who sees this type of picture. These teens need to be taught that when you split with somebody or stop being friends with somebody it is not okay to try to ruin their world. There needs to be punishment for that. While i believe a parent should teach their child that this is not okay that will not stop the one who has parents that are to busy to teach them, to busy to punish them, usually to busy to even know what their kids are doing.
This is a serious issue that needs to be dealt with. While most parents teach their kids not to steal you still have the ones who do it. The ones who go ahead and steal get in trouble right? Why is this any difference? Doing either one is wrong.
Sex is a funny subject, most parents are afraid to bring up the subject and don't want the schools to teach about the subject yet let their kids see every type of sex they want on TV. I don't understand that? If sex is so personal then why is blasted everywhere we look? Then there is sex-ed, which to me is very laughable.. If you want to teach a teen about sex then do it on their level. They do not care about ovaries, eggs, etc. They need somebody who will just put the facts out there for them not somebody who will say go ahead just use protection.
They need somebody who will be honest and straight forward about the facts that matter before going into the details that will likely bore them to sleep. Not only do they need to be taught the facts but they need to be taught self respect as well. Yes a persons body is beautiful but it is a gift that is not meant for everyone! It is something you were given to share with a special person. People who respect themselves do not have to have the whole world approve their body to be confident in who they are, they don't have to prove themselves to the ones they date by showing their bodies.
That said, I believe anybody who is caught with these types of pictures on their phone should be punished. Especially if these are pictures of an uderage person. As a parent I want to know that my children are protected, even if it means they need to be protected from themselves. There should be a line that is set for these punishments though. I don't think they should be labeled as sex offenders because that is not what they are.
To simply punish is not the answer to the problem. There needs to be a fit punishment. What some people fail to realise is the aftermath of what happens when one of those picture messages are spread around to cause hurt. They aren't part of the pain the person feels, the jokes they become the butt of, and they sure aren't the ones dealing with the pain a family feels when their child has committed suicide because there is no escaping their peers after the picture has been spread. How can you let that go unpunished? If it were you child on that end of it would you let the one responsible for sending it off free?
While our kids need to be educated on the whole sex issue and the respect issue, they also need to know that there is punishment for when they mess up. I just hope whoever gets to make the choices in this makes the right one for the punishment and sex offender doesn't apply in this case. Maybe they will figure it out and soon put a stop to some of this craziness.
Learn more about this author, It's Me.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
No
Created on: February 03, 2012 Last Updated: February 04, 2012
While it may sound nice on paper, teens should not be charged with a crime for sexting. This is based on the precedent that two 16 year-olds can have sex and it is not considered a crime in any form. If teens can have actual sex legally, then what sense does it make to charge teens with a crime because they sent a dirty picture?
It is none of the legal establishment’s business what teens do. Should the police be arresting boys who look at nudie magazines too? It is ridiculous to make this a criminal charge. The responsibility lies with parents, not a court room. The point here is not the morality of sexting, but whether it should be a crime. A quick solution is for a parent to grab their teen’s phone, delete all the pictures in the phone, and then hand it back. Case closed.
The Libertarian mindset puts the burden on the parents, where it belongs. No one will call teen sexting “good.” But whether you like the sexting of teens or not is none of your business, and certainly not a judge’s business. It is up to the parents to monitor their teen’s sexual activities. It cannot be emphasized any more that parents should be responsible for their teenagers’ irresponsible sexual activities whether it be sexting, looking at pornography, or having actual sex.
Again, the argument here is not that whether sexting is okay or not, but whether it should be a crime. There is a different, but similar scenario that should be a crime and that is sexting between adults and underage teens. The law should be similar to age of consent laws. This is the common sense approach, and it makes sense to prosecute such cases. Absolutely make it illegal to pass pictures of naked 13 year-olds, but you need proof in America. The court cannot assume that picture is a 13 year-old. It could be a picture of a young looking 18 year-old. Proof is required.
As much as the government hates it, we have rights. If two 16 year-olds send nude pictures back and forth, let the parents deal with it. The government needs to mind their own business and pursue real crime. If parents won’t do anything, then oh well. You cannot command a family to set up certain rules. That’s America for you. If the parents don’t care that their son or daughter is sending nude pictures to their boyfriend or girlfriend, it isn’t anyone’s business. Remember, those teens can legally go and have real sex. So charging them with sexting crimes really shows the pathetic priorities of the legal system. Once again, if two 16 year-olds can have legal sex, then how can you charge them with a sexting crime? It is beyond ridiculous.
Another problem with the stupidity of prosecuting sexting is that you cannot verify the age of the person in the nude picture. Often times, a prosecutor can probably prove that the age is under 18, but there are many cases of pictures that are of 18-20 year-old girls being exchanged. This can be directly compared to trading nudie magazines. Are we going to arrest those teens too? What if a girl took a nude picture of herself at age 17 and she is now age 20? Should she be arrested for sending out her picture? What if it is sent to someone who didn’t want it? Since there was a sexting that occurred on the phone until that person deletes the picture, should he or she go to jail for sexting? You don’t get to pick if you want a sexting picture.
No one with a shred of responsibility promotes teens trading nude pictures, but there is a real problem when the legal system skips over the first line of defense, parents; and then takes matters that are really none of their business and actually makes it a crime. The point is who should be responsible for stopping sexting amongst teens? The answer is not some sheriff’s deputy, but the parents should be doing something. Pick up your kid’s phone, delete every picture, ground your kid for 2 weeks, and hand it back to them. Congratulations, the case is now closed. Government, go find a pedophile ring (these are children under the age of 14), and let parents handle sexting teens.
Learn more about this author, Daniel Cloud.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.