Get a Widget for this title
RSS FeedPatriotism in the world: Does it unite or separate nations?
Results so far:
| Unite | 47% | 100 votes | Total: 215 votes | |
| Separate | 53% | 115 votes |
Unite
Write now
Print
Invite a writer™
Add to FavoritesPatriotism is unto itself neither divisive or unifying. As with all things, what we must strive for is balance. While a complete lack of patriotism or "love of country" is a negative, too much of the same devolves into jingoism which is dangerous for all who live in our interconnected world.
I love this country and would do anything for her and the ideals with which we were founded on. That does not blind me to the fact that we are not always "right" simply by birth. such arrogance has lately clouded our foreign policy and weakened our leadership role throughout the world. Confidence that grows to a national belief in superiority, as a birthright, is not patriotism but a strange sort of overblown nationalism.
Part of being a patriotic American is honoring those who came before. The struggles, truimphs and yes, failures of our iconic leaders are part and parsel to the American experience. We grow by learning and trying not to make the same mistakes as those before us. Admitting mistakes and learning from them are a pathway for growth, individually and as a nation.
Pondering the historical turning points in our past not only allows us to point out mistakes, but also for quite reflection upon the amazing feats of self-sacrifice that dots our history. There have been a great many truly heroic Americans, both famed and forgotten, who have lived the ideal. Honoring these heroes seems a worthwhile endeavor. They have lived and died so that we may enjoy the freedoms of this great nation.
The danger of jingoism or national racism, is powerful. We can be plunged into war, religious persecution or irrational isolationism by an attitude of superiority which allows us to decide what is best for the rest of the world. We do better by "keeping our own side of the street clean" and allowing others to decide for themselves.
While I believe patriotism is a good thing, I think it must be tempered with self-awareness. A nation aware of their own limitations seems less likely to make unrealistic demands of others. Believing we are the best of nations does not require others to follow our lead to be deemed worthy. A confident and secure America does not have to have the entire world reformed in our image. We can content ourselves to be willing to help, lend a hand to the needy, without an expectation of gain, either monetarily or in prestige. Literally being the best we can be, in affairs both foreign and domestic. Such confident interaction and assistance in world affairs truly allows us to be proudly patriotic American citizens.
Learn more about this author, Jim Markley.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Separate
The question of the consequences of patriotism has several levels of complexity. In a theoretical sense, patriotism has the potential to either unite or separate nations, depending on its application. As mentioned by some writers, the line between patriotism and nationalism is a very significant distinction; however, oftentimes the line between the two can be vague and one can become the other almost unnoticed.
In practical examples, the negative consequences of patriotism often win out over the positives. In most cases, nations do not practice patriotism simply by exhibiting a sense of pride in their culture and history, but also often by using themselves as a criteria by which they measure the worth of other nations. The former is not a problem if practiced in purity, but the latter can become a force that can snowball into such things as nationalism, as well as create an environment in which racism has the potential to thrive in the event that other nations have significant ethnic distinctions. Such a problem is seen among many of the tribal nations in Africa and the Middle East, among others.
Furthermore, the rift between the idea of patriotism and the application of it is widened by the way it is used as a tool of governments. America in particular has always emphasized the idea of patriotism as a tool to drive military force-it is no surprise that at the beginning of an American armed conflict such as the "War on Terror," patriotic messages and sentiments are pushed extensively to boost military recruitment and government support. This propaganda is effective on several levels: a higher recruitment rate often leads to increased chances of success (historically) and that victory causes the nation to be "rewarded" for its patriotism, which in turn increases the odds that the nation will support the current or similar administrations in similar power plays in the future.
Often overlooked, though, by the media and others with the power to send a message to the citizens, are the negative effects of such a strategy. By using patriotism in such a way, the leadership is simultaneously toeing the aforementioned vague line toward nationalism as well as creating an isolating distrust of those the nation would call "enemies." Like the internment camps for the Japanese during World War II, an environment of paranoia is propagated that is cast over the vast majority of Middle Eastern citizens, regardless of their origin. This issue is often blamed on the enemies themselves, and never attributed to the implied superiority given by propagandistic methods.
In summation, patriotism itself does not necessarily separate nations, but the applications of it do so more often than not. This is not an absolute, however, so with insight a person can learn to tell the difference between patriotism and propaganda. Considering the rapid proliferation of the Internet, the world will very soon have the opportunity to be united as one people, and in the absence of visitation from other planets, a very positive step could be made if people could feel a new kind of patriotism, one that allows them to be proud to be a citizen of our planet and a member of the human race. If that were to happen, I would gladly change my vote over to the other side.
Learn more about this author, Gareth Hewes.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Difference of opinion? Debate now.
- Political Values
- Are political morals decaying?
- Do you trust federal bureaucrat regulators in Washington to tell you how to live your life?
- Surveillance in America: Are we being watched?
- Should people be punished for wrongful thoughts?
- Will the United States still be a democracy in 50 years?
- Crime: Individual responsibility or social problems?
