Will Bush's past be vindicated?

Yes

1 of 1

by Barry Girolamo

Write now Print Invite a writer™ Add to Favorites RSS Feed Contact this writer

George W. Bush will be judged well by historians, and there is little doubt that most of the ridiculous liberal left wing rhetoric will be exposed as nothing more than shallow personal and political attacks that the Democratic party has been reduced to engaging in. Whomever doesn't agree with a liberal, according to lefty liberals, is dumb, uninformed, and beneath them.

The Democratic party is led by a group of elitist snobs, most of whom are extremely wealthy, who try to make themselves feel better by playing with peoples emotions and creating class envy by denying that they too enjoy the financial success which can be achieved by anyone in this great country that is willing to work hard and contribute to this nation by becoming a productive member of society.

Take a good look at the leaders in the democratic party, it's a real eye opener. Bill Clinton? The very name induces jokes, I mean, the man was a real embarrassment, although he did invent a new use for the cigar. If not for the Republican led congress which dominated his administration, he would have accomplished nothing.

Newt Gingrich, and his contract with America, laid the foundation for economic growth and put an end to some of the most egregious welfare fraud being perpetrated against middle class taxpayers and their families. Bill Clinton simply signed his name to a lot of republican legislation, and then took credit for it.

Hillary fell apart in her bid for the presidency, and there was such a weak field of candidates, that we wound up with a way too young and inexperienced Barack Obama, whose resume is probably the most pathetic of any modern day president.

He has no experience at anything, except as a "community organizer", and he won the election by using groups such as ACORN to register empty headed young people who lacked the "real life" experience to make an intelligent decision as to who they should chose to lead the country.

If you go down the list of the other so called democratic party leaders, it's more of the same. Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Barney Frank, John Kerry, Al Gore, Ted Kennedy and the like are all elitist snobs who haven't a clue as to what it means to be a member of the middle class attempting to raise a family and make a living in this country.

George W. Bush was saddled with the events of 9/11, and this attack on our country had to become the focus of his attention. He did a great job of protecting us, and he and Tony Blaire did what had to be done. The United Nations is nothing but a paper tiger, which we here in America have been burdened with and must finance, and after trying to negotiate some kind of support from this organization to keep the murdering Saddam Hussein in check, Bush and Blaire took the only action which was left to them.

Hussein was thumbing his nose at us, ignoring the conditions of his surrender, running rape rooms, torture chambers, using weapons of mass destruction against his own people (so don't tell me that he had none), offering sanctuary to terrorist groups, shooting at our pilots as we attempted to keep him in check, and eventually kicking the United Nations inspectors out of Iraq. It was a real circus which had to be dealt with in a decisive way, and Bush will be looked at as a president who took the necessary action.

Bush and Blaire brought down a horrible regime, and gave Iraq a chance at giving it's citizens the ability to vote for their own leaders, and in doing so, he planted the seed of democracy in the middle east. Bush had the vision and the tenacity to take the bull by the horns, and because of his leadership, we are on our way to finally getting a handle on the middle east.

This should have been done forty years ago. If you are female and reading this, can you imagine living in a world in which you are little more than a slave to men, having no chance at an education, and being forced to walk around covered from head to toe? I doubt it, and if you don't believe that what Bush accomplished was for the good of all, then you must be a Kool-Aid drinking liberal, too wrapped up in lofty ideals to see what is really going on in the world.

Even Obama realizes that we have to maintain a presence there, and we have to kill our enemies. That is the reality. There are still people who want to kill us all and bring this country down, and that is why Obama is ratcheting up the war in Afghanistan.

I wonder why the liberal press isn't complaining about Obama keeping our troop presence in Iraq, and escalating our military actions in Afghanistan? More of the same old double standard by the main stream media.

Bush needs no vindication from anyone. His actions were justified and are deserving of praise. He did what had to be done in order to allow us to continue to maintain our freedoms. Radical Islamic Fundamentalists are our enemy, and are a threat to world peace and prosperity. Bush was right, he was always right. He didn't tire, he didn't falter, and he didn't fail us. Thank you, George W. Bush. You will be judged as a great leader and president.

Learn more about this author, Barry Girolamo.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.