Home > Computers & Technology > Internet > Internet Security & Safety > Malware & Identity Theft
Results so far:
| Yes | 53% | 132 votes | Total: 250 votes | |
| No | 47% | 118 votes |
Yes
Created on: February 16, 2009
Although chip implantation will making tracking people extremely easy that may not necessarily be a great thing as government agencies start keeping greater checks on people; the privacy of the people is at risk. At first, this may not seem like a huge hassle but a situation can be imagined where such drastic measures can eventually lead to severe limitations of personal liberty, which includes movement as well. Such freedoms are an intrinsic part of us as human beings, over the years many revolutions have taken place for the sake of liberty. The words of Abraham Lincoln still echo in the ears of many of us, "Give me Liberty or give me death". It seems to me that we,as a society, are regressing rather than progressing. Even though in a strictly technological sense of the term we may be moving forward but the tabs which are being kept on people are restricting personal freedom. Services such as the new tracking service offered by Google only seek to further my case presented against the use of technology to track people. What is important here is that the discussion is not limited to the fact that teenagers can easily get tracked by their parents; the discussion seeks to present the possibility of technology being used adversely by those in power to curb the freedom of the people, which is an intrinsic right. The worlds presented in movies such as equilibrium, where people are not even allowed to feel seem far fetched at present but the way these drastic measures are being employed, it seems like a world close to such an extreme is a practical possibility. The idea of which should be alarming to most people so rather than accepting ideas such as chip implantation, we should learn to be more skeptical and look into the real purpose being suggestions of the employment of such ideas. It is easy for the people in power to present an ideology and use their influence to fool the people into believing the false advantages of a particular measure. However, the people should learn to be more critical of such methods deployed against them. They should learn not to accept every new innovation without a proper analysis. The Patriot Act in the United States has come under severe scrutiny due to the limitations it has placed on personal liberty but no change has taken place, infact attempts at curbing personal liberties have intensified. In a day and age where terrorism is used a tool to make sure people live in constant fear and the umbrella term is used as an excuse to reduce personal liberties and even go to war, we should as people learn to fight against the ruling ideology rather than accepting it right away without any inspection. We must learn to think for ourselves.
Learn more about this author, Shehzad Ghias.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
No
Created on: July 27, 2010 Last Updated: July 28, 2010
The idea sounds good on the surface: implant a microchip (usually an RFID, or Radio Frequency Identification) under the skin and, presto-practically everything about you is always on your person and secure. You can check out at the supermarket without waiting in line; just walk through the scanner and you’re done! Need to prove your identity but don’t have your paper ID? That’s okay, because you have a built-in chip that provides all of this. Plus, you can probably sleep much better knowing that your personal information, as well as overall identity, is safe and secure. Sounds great from a marketing perspective, right?
Stop and think about it. Chip implants have not been proven to curtail any more identity theft than the unfortunate victims that identity theft happens to. Added to that, do you really think that people with nefarious intentions will still not try to “crack the code?” If you if said yes, you’d be wrong. Crackers and hackers have, so far, succeeded in breaking almost every security system ever devised.
Take this into account:
•Symantec, a billion-dollar anti-virus/anti-malw are company that sells the popular Norton anti-virus software, itself was hacked in 2007.
•CACI (one of the U.S. government’s largest defense contractors) has been hacked.
•Allscripts Healthcare Solutions is an IT corporation that services healthcare providers globally. The Electronic Health Record Solutions (EHRs) is one of their products. It was a victim of hacking.
•Pharmaceutical giant Merck, Cardinal Health and Paramount Pictures were hacked and infected with the globally-disastrous Zeus virus only at last January.
That’s the [very] shortlist of high-profile victims. There are well over three thousand more that have been hacked and have had information stolen. The businesses range from healthcare, to IT, to government and contractors, to retail giants and to security firms themselves.
That is only part of the part of the problem. Not only will chip implants fail to stop identity theft, they will also rob people of any privacy that they even have left. Government surveillance exists in practically every nook and cranny on Earth. Legislation like the Patriot Act, while its premise of catching terrorists is a very good thing, forgoes many more freedoms and privacies we used to enjoy. Furthermore, even third-party (private) government contractors are allowed to spy on everyday citizens. Given the totally corrupt landscape of the corporate world, that makes the idea of a chip implant terrifying.
Also:
•Transponders are used in conjunction with RFID’s. If they fail, removing a chip implant is very hard, if not virtually impossible.
•Having a chip implant is, essentially, having a barcode stamped on your forehead.
•In Christianity, it’s a very popular belief that this will be used as “the mark of the beast”.
•Human rights/liberties will suffer.
•If and when hackers finally gain access to a person’s chip implant, there is no question about. Forget just a credit card # or social security number-this hacker will OWN that person.
“Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security deserves neither and will lose both” –Benjamin Franklin
Learn more about this author, Michael Bock.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.