Home > Sports & Recreation > Football > College Football
Results so far:
| Yes | 22% | 88 votes | Total: 394 votes | |
| No | 78% | 306 votes |
Yes
Created on: November 28, 2009
This is a loaded question. I'm voting "yes" because in a sense there is no system more fair than the BCS. However, the BCS is actually unfair. That's the point. It's supposed to be unfair. After all, this isn't just "football." This is "college football." What makes the BCS great-and, yes, I did say great-is that nothing in any other collegiate sport resembles a collegiate course more than BCS football.
Think of the Bowl Championship Series computer formula as a professor. Dr. BCS, in charge of a Advanced Football and Football Theory course unlike any other class. Each university fields a class of some fifty players who meet a strict athletic requirement and, in many cases, meet the school's strict academic requirement as well. They have their staff of university-hired tutors, some with professional football backgrounds, others who are basically tenured tutors of football.
At the end of the season, somewhere around December, these players are graded with their teams. They have three months to make their case, and the professor places them in a final exam with a similar team. This professor is unfair, unbelievably strict, and does not argue over grades. If you've been to college, you've had a professor with nasty grading habits too. It's something we all go through. I had professors in college who insisted on only handing out a select few "A" grades, and I felt ripped off when I didn't get one. if I'd have gotten that grade, someone else wouldn't have. This is the sensation the BCS provides.
So Boise State can work harder than everyone else, bust their humps, and end up with an A when they and many casual observers feel they deserve an A+. Last year they did all their work, turned it all in on time and without error (meaning they went the entire regular season without losing a game) and got a B. In the BCS system, the teams that qualify for the big bowls get an A. The teams that play for the championship get the only two A+s. Boise State was left out of the BCS.
Yeah, everyone else has a playoff of at least sixteen teams. Those tournaments are tremendously fun to watch. I love the Final Four and I can't wait until one day when my alma mater finally makes the Frozen Four. I'm sure a college football playoff would be entertaining, and it'd leave fewer questions. That doesn't make the concept of a playoff altogether "fair" either. First and foremost, what separates the last team into thhe playoffs and the first team out of it? And do tournaments actually give us the best teams on top every year? (Was George Mason really one of the four best basketball teams in 2006?)
Still, there's something more collegiate about the somewhat arbitrary BCS. I can't help but think of the BCS rankings as a grading of the top college football teams. Florida's working on an A+, Ohio State overcame a rough quiz or two to eke out an A and a trip to the Rose Bowl, Boise State and TCU are up there in the A range, and if there's a tougher "A" it likely involves words like "quantum" and "MIT."
Imagine college football players in uniform sitting in a crowded auditorium with a little man in glasses speaking to them. "Look to your left. Look to your right. Unless any of you three chumps play in the SEC you can pretty much forget about that A+." Imagine the teams that play the politics game to improve their BCS spot as teacher's pets, and the complainers as overachieving crybabies. The BCS is just a professor in a nasty course that wouldn't be the same under some different grading scale.
The BCS is fair like life is fair. That is, it isn't, but in at least it's generally even in its unfairness. Not everybody gets a trophy in real life, not even everybody who deserves one. That's just life. Sometimes the kiss-ass gets the promotion even though you're the one doing more work. (I'm talking about you here of course, because I'm too busy going on about the BCS to claim to be that guy myself.) Sometimes the nasty professor marks you down for something you can't even control. I mean, come on, if life was fair we'd recognize these colleges as actual schools, and not simply football teams who play their home games on college campuses.
Learn more about this author, Timothy Williams.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
No
Created on: January 16, 2011
The Bowl Championship Series (BCS) system is unfair, because it does not reward the smaller school for the schedule they are required to play. Automatic Qualifying (AQ) bowl bid is when the conferences are predetermined for BCS bowl games; henceforth, it will never give teams that play in smaller conferences a fair chance at playing in a bowl game such as the Rose Bowl. The overall classification of a conference as strong or weak will always favor the more popular conferences such as Southeastern Conference; therefore, the bigger conferences will always receive the Automatic Qualifying bid.
BCS system is penalizing smaller schools for playing the schedule they are required to play. Some teams are not able to schedule bigger schools or are not playing enough of the teams in conferences such as the Big Ten. BCS will consider the schedule weak; therefore, it ultimately, tells a team no matter how hard they will play and how well their won-loss record will look at the end of the season, they will never play for a National Championship. BCS is preferential to the bigger conferences and schedules they play; therefore, it could never fairly represent all teams when, it is favorable to certain group or conference.
The BCS bowl system allows AQ bowl bids. It is setup to ensure the bigger or stronger conferences get to certain bowl games. For example, the Big Ten and the Pac Ten champions will play in the Rose Bowl if they are not playing for the BCS Championship. It is yet another way that preferential treatment is provided to schools deemed to play in a stronger conference. AQ bowl bid puts the Non-AQ schools at a disadvantage before they ever play a down of football. In order for the BCS to be truly fair to all schools, the system cannot have Automatic Qualifying bids.
The classification of strong or weak conference by the BCS continues to create more obstacles for the Non AQ to navigate through. The conference classified as strong will receive automatic qualifying bids while the conferences that are determined weak will become the dreaded Non-AQ. Conferences will play well one year and terrible the next, but the system does not account for down years therefore, the same conferences will always be considered strong and will continue to play in the various BCS Bowl games.
According to the BCS, teams like TCU and Boise State had schedules that were not strong enough; they played in a conference that does not have an AQ bowl bid, and their conferences are considered weak. BCS system is not fair, because there is too much preferential treatment shown to certain conferences, it allows automatic bids and determines the strength of the conference. Teams like Boise State or TCU will never flourish under the BCS system, because it does not allow a level playing field.
Learn more about this author, Devon.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.