Home > Politics, News & Issues > International Politics > War & Terrorism
Results so far:
| Air | 33% | 28 votes | Total: 86 votes | |
| Ground | 67% | 58 votes |
Air
Created on: October 29, 2009 Last Updated: October 30, 2009
There is no single strategy that can defeat the terrorists who plague Western Civilization. Terrorism, as it has evolved today, is a worldwide issue, fostered by religious zealotry and hatred, and carried out by many different groups in and from developed, developing, underdeveloped and failed-state countries.
While air power might be effective in combating terrorist groups in open country, it works less well in mountainous areas like Afghanistan and the border regions of Pakistan, where the natural environment provides shelter and protection from even the most massive of conventional air strikes.
This is why Usama bin Laden was not killed in 2001 when the United States and its allies used overwhelming air power in attacking the Tora Bora area where he and the Al Qaeda leadership were holed up. Because we did not have enough trained ground combat forces in the area to seal it off, bin Laden and his top lieutenants were able to escape to the border areas of Pakistan not under control of that country's central government.
Conversely, the use of ground forces often works well in open or forested terrain, or in urban settings. But, as we saw in places like Somalia, it is ineffective when you are fighting in an area with a hostile, armed populace, who resent any occupying foreign forces.
Without air support and the resolve to inflict damage on the civilian population - in other words a total war strategy - it is a losing proposition to throw either armies or air forces against entrenched guerillas.
And in dealing with terrorists who have entered developed countries, such as the London subway bombers and the sleeper cells periodically uprooted in the United States and Europe, military force is useless. This is strictly an intelligence and law enforcement function and requires a close working relationship among agencies, rather than any intercinine turf wars for credit in making arrests.
In real and practical terms, terrorists will always be with us. Whether motivated by religion or other reasons, it is as impossible to stamp it out as it is to eliminate crime or win the so-called War on Drugs. Conflict, religious extremism and ethnic hatred are simply part and parcel of the human condition.
You cannot change the nature of people by use of force. Thus you cannot control terrorism solely by the use of military power. What is required is a combination of efforts. Ground, naval and air forces where you are in appropriate hostile terrain, to degrade the power and capabilities of organized terrorist groups. Special operations commando forces to deal with smaller cells in host countries.
Intelligence operations, including the use of drone surveillance and attack aircraft in areas harboring terrorists and without any interference from the local governments. And in countries where there are functioning, friendly governments, there must be close cooperation of intelligence and law enforcement personnel to locate, infiltrate and disrupt groups intent on committing acts of terrorism against the population and infrastructure.
There must also must be a concerted effort by all countries to stop the flow of funds into terrorist coffers, be it from donations, businesses or illegal enterprises such as the opium trade. Without money, these groups cannot operate or procure weapons and explosives and they will wither and break apart.
Finally, it is important that Western Nations invest in the infrastructure and development of opportunity for the populace in underdeveloped and threatened nations, especially in Asia and the Middle East, where terrorism has its base of strength, so that the people have hope and a chance to improve their lives. Otherwise the continued radicalization of these folks will provide a nearly infinite supply of terrorists for generations to come.
There are no simplistic solutions to fighting terrorism. If you want to declare war upon it, then as we learned in Iraq, be prepared to shore up any peace that you achieve.
Learn more about this author, Martin W. Schwartz.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Ground
Created on: September 20, 2008
From its earliest days of reconnaissance to precision laser-guided munitions delivered from pilot-less drones, air power has been nothing short of a battlefield miracle. When the first balloons and dirigibles went up in the air in the 1800's, they were linked to the ground by telegraph wires so their crews could spot enemy troop movements. Artillery would then pound those troops, softening them up for the incoming waves of foot soldiers. With the advent of winged aircraft came the ability to fly deep into enemy territory to spot camps, headquarters and gun emplacements. Shortly afterwards, the idea of dropping explosives from these wood and cloth planes occurred. This added a new dimension to battles and changed the face of war forever.
Over the years, the planes got bigger and faster and the munitions got smarter and more lethal. Once upon a time, pilots would throw explosives out of the open-air cockpits of their wobbly biplanes, in the hopes of getting in a lucky toss. Now have laser-guided smart munitions that can hit a two foot square target from several miles away in the span of a few heartbeats. Against an organized and well-trained force, airpower can be, and often has been, a deciding factor for victory. Countries that would wage war upon a nation with a modern air arm now understand that their infrastructure and government buildings are all easy targets. This alone is enough to give pause to even the most bloodthirsty tyrant. Once the bombs and missiles begin raining down, destroying roads, power plants and production facilities, it doesn't take long for the general population to pressure leadership to sue for peace.
Unfortunately, the War on Terror isn't against standing governments, at least not openly. Terrorist warriors don't plan sweeping troop movements or engage in political maneuvering. Instead, they rely on slipping through the cracks of our armor and attacking the soft parts. Blowing up a power plant in some far off country does not deter a terrorist, but often emboldens them. Even if the population clamors for peace, this war isn't being run by national leaders, but instead by tribal leaders and religious zealots.
As these terrorists surreptitiously slip across our borders or drive explosive-laded trucks into our embassies, it won't be aircraft that protect us, but ground troops. It will be brave men and women patrolling dusty streets that will uncover dens of murderers as they plot against the innocent. It will be special operations troops as they crawl through the caves and over mountain passes that will do battle with the terrorists. More than that, it will be our people, interacting with the everyday people of terrorist-sponsoring countries that will be a deciding factor in this war, not the policy makers. Aircraft cannot stand guard at our nation's ports and borders. It will be individual people, working hand in hand with the population, who will be the deciding factor in this war.
As the War on Terror continues, there are fewer and fewer hard targets left for our air forces to eliminate. Terrorists and their assets are very mobile. This often means that they scatter before our fliers can be brought to bear. This doesn't mean that our airpower in impotent or ineffective, but it does mean that it isn't always the right tool for the job. In the War on Terror, our ground troops are the tool we need. As is evidenced by the last troop surge, more boots on the ground has a definite impact on terrorist activities, whether it's patrolling Kabul and sniping insurgents or digging wells and building schools.
Learn more about this author, Mark Murphy.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.