Title endorsed in part by:
Results so far:
| Better | 43% | 13 votes | Total: 30 votes | |
| Worse | 57% | 17 votes |
Are our lives better because of the Big Box Stores? Generally I would say yes. Not a resounding, pound on the desk yes, but a slow yes with some thought behind it. I live in an area that has fought the Big Box Stores with tooth and nail. The result is Wally World, which is the nick name for the biggest one, is over 20 miles away. Of course there is a Freddies on every corner, and a few others that I would consider rightfully under the Big Box Banner. But they've been around for so long people see them as a part of the landscape.
The fight centered on control of traffic and crime not on the philosophical argument that we are cutting our own throats by outsourcing and importing goods. They weren't even concerned much by the working conditions of many people in the third world countries where a lot of the merchandise is manufactured. Phone call campaigns sponsored and paid for by stores that don't want the competition were common. The callers used scare tactics, such as "Did you know the drug trade increases when these stores are built?' When the caller was asked where she got this statistic, she hemmed and hawed and refused to answer the question. I don't like the current school of campaigning by fear, and am more impressed when advertising tells me the advantages of our current stores instead of making me fear something new.
As for the erosion of our lifestyles by the introduction of less expensive goods. Where is the spirit of competition? Didn't we deregulate and break up Ma Bell a few decades ago to bring about less expensive service? There are laws against monopolies these days. Price fixing is a dirty phrase, as well as being illegal. A friend who works for a manufacturer in the area was incensed that Wally had negotiated for lower prices on the goods made by her company. She felt it was unfair the company should compromise their price. The fact that they made a tidy profit by virtue of the sheer numbers of units sold was unimportant. The thing she focused on was the purchaser shouldn't negotiate for a lower price, the seller should set their prices. What I saw was they could make a profit at a lower price, they just wanted more and she had a job.
I watch people struggle to get jobs here where unemployment is over 12%, the second highest unemployment rate in the nation, and I can't help but wonder if we have priced our work so high that we are out of the market. In order to live in the style to which we have become accustomed, the average worker in the US has had to demand more and more wages. It is rather like the question: Which came first the chicken or the egg? Did the demand for higher wages help to drive up the prices, which resulted in the need for even higher wages?
I'm a housewife. The overwhelming philosophical points that come up when we talk about this topic are a bit beyond me. When you are trying to make ends meet in the middle with no gap, anything that will help is welcome. Four years ago I bought a sewing machine table after looking for a long time. The least expensive one I found was over $200 made of melamine. My husband could make one for about $175 in materials, but he didn't have the time. I found one at the store 20 miles away for $98. It was made of melamine, same as the competition, only it had a few more features than the more expensive model. Neither were made of cherry wood like my last one, that doesn't fit my new machine. But they don't scratch as easily and will hold up for a longer time. Guess which one is in my sewing room today.
Profit keeps businesses going, I get that. But while watching Detroit circle the drain, I can't help but wonder if our need for ever gaining profits contributed to the demise as much as bad management. Three years ago I gave up my American made car for one with better mileage, better warranty, and a lower price than the American made competitor. I feel guilty about it, but I couldn't afford the American made vehicle.
I think at this point in history we need to look at what got us into this mess and what can get us out. Everyone has fewer dollars in their pockets to spend. While we debate the ideas behind whether these stores are good or bad for us, their parking lots are full, their employees have work, and they are providing goods and services that are affordable. Thats the bottom line, and while high minded ideals look good on paper, reality is the filled parking lot.
Learn more about this author, Terri Kleinberg.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Are We Our Own Worst Enemy?
The erosion of the Middle Class or the decline of the "New Rome," which phrase would be a more apt description of the environment in which us, the consumers, find ourselves inhabiting. Either of these could describe the current trends, due largely to the big box retailers. Is it their fault that this is occurring? Can it be attributed to ourselves, as a collective group, to fulfill our desire for material wealth? Neither one nor the other can be solely responsible. It is the combination of the two ideals that is to blame.
As joblessness is on the rise, the people demand that products and/or services are cheaper. Big box stores fulfill this need by purchasing cheaply manufactured goods. This is certainly eased through the use of outsourcing to the so-called non-industrialized nations, where hourly wages are extremely low, in comparison to the cost of production in say Britain, Canada or the United States.
Big box stores make these cheaper products available to us and initially we feel happy and content. The retailers feel satisfaction since they have answered the call of the purchaser. The purchaser feels that his or her requests for cheaper products has been realized since the only thing that they really see or feel passionate about is the sum at the bottom of the sales receipt. A well-known retailer uses a similar concept in one of their commercials, hence perpetrating this desire.
At first blush, this appears to be a good thing; the consumers' purchasing power has increased. However, one can see what will occur next; as a pattern begins to emerge. As time progresses, more and more products are produced off-shore. This certainly leads to layoffs and plant shutdowns in the consumers' locale. People still need to buy their goods but since they have less money, they ask once more for cheaper products. Big box stores respond again by importing even lower cost goods.
Where else could this lead? Manufacturing of certain products cease in our countries. Due to layoffs, the expertise that was formerly used in the production of these products is no longer available. Consider a possible consequence of a political breakdown between the consuming nation and the producing country. Would we no longer be able to make "Product X," that people have come to reply upon; leading to a worsening of the economy? It is possible.
Sure jobs have increased in the big box retailing sector as well as the logistics and warehousing fields. However, these jobs are no longer paying a truly 'livable' wage; further leading to more desire to extend one's buying power. The owners of these companies continue to get richer, thus a small portion of the population moves up in the class structure. The employees, due to their lowered wages, move down into the lower class brackets. The overall affect is the erosion of the middle class.
Learn more about this author, Ian Jackson.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.

