Wrong

by Mark Mukasa

Created on: July 24, 2009   Last Updated: July 26, 2009

Imperialism will never disappear. As long as we have large collectives of humans living together, they will attempt to subjugate in some form another group. And sometimes this involves actively attempting to conquer distant lands and repopulating them with another nationality. This is an inevitable facet of humanity. People conquer and subjugate. However a common justification of imperialist expansions is that imperialism somehow brings benefits despite the horrors it perpetrates. After the US acquisition of Panama in the 1900s, many lamented the deaths of the Panamanians and the undermining of sovereignty of another nation by the United states. However what would become a commonly used phrase to justify such interventions was uttered by Theodore Roosevelt. Roosevelt claims the end justified the means. However does the potential long term benefits of imperialism justify the act of invading another sovereign nation?

First of all it must be noted that all historical actions have some sort of beneficial effect. For example it could be argued that the ancient Roman expansion although bloody brought about various technological advances, despite the high cost of life. For example the Roman campaign into Gaul resulted in hundreds of thousand of deaths. However without the Romans we might not have had the luxuries of roads, aqueducts and various cultural benefit's the Romans bequeathed us with. However over a long term period most imperialist ambitions can benefit some groups of people greatly. For example the majority of the Western world rests its economic affluence on their subjugation of African nations and the slave industry. Perhaps without the slave industry and the raping of Africa we would lack the money to implement our generally decent standard of living we enjoy now.

Ultimately all imperialist campaigns benefit some groups of people. However the very essence of the campaign unanimously involves the disruption of the way of life of a society, the murder of innumerable amounts of people and the more imbedded psychological effects on a people. Homes are uprooted, orphans are formed and societies might be changed for the worst. If we examine Rwanda during the 19th Century before the arrival of the Belgians, we see a nation that although not as technologically advanced as some of its other African counterparts or European nations it has a relatively good living standard and is for the most part largely harmonious. The complex society did not recognise ethnicity as a factor and so ensured the cooperation with the Hutu and the Tutsi. However with the Belgian arrival in 1916, they fostered ethnic divisions with extensive bureaucracy and disenfranchised the Hutu. This psychologically created the hostility between the disenfranchised Hutu and the ruling Tutsi which ultimately led to the Rwandan genocide of 1994 with anywhere between 700,000-900,000 people dead as a result of ethnic cleansing.

The main benefactors of imperialist ambitions are the elite of the conquering nations. For example the British acquisition of India lead to wealthy opium traders, wealthy plantation owners and lead to the creation of a large social grouping of affluent businessmen profiting off the subjugations of the Indians. Many Indians were largely left out of the resulting profit of the expansion into Indian and the entire Indian rural economy was decimated. However many pragmatists would argue that the British Empire in India was justified due to the implementation of public sanitation services, criminalisation of the caste system, railway services, prohibition of slavery and increased medical services. However this does not justify expansionism. Yes, at times imperialism does bring beneficial effects but this does not justify the action.
For example if we examine Germany during the late 1930s to 1945 it is apparent that Germany was essentially an imperialist nation. However under the Third Reich there were advancements in employment, social services and various other services. The Volkswagen company is an example of the benefits Hitler's regime brought us. However can we actually claim that the Nazi-led Germany was a necessity to bring about these benefits? Can we justify the regime that killed around 6 million Jews as it was a means to an end? No. We cannot use some benefits of imperialism as a reason to justify it.

What we must understand is that progress is a natural facet of humanity. Although imperialism might appear to bring progress of a society, in reality it rather accelerates it. Progress will come about without war as humans are forever trying to improve their standards of living. For example for members of the European Union, imperialism has been frowned upon and largely unfulfilled, however without imperialism the EU member states have improved the living standards of their people at a faster rate than at any point in history. Without the need to conquer and settle distant lands.

Although imperialism will not disappear from humanity, we must acknowledge that imperialism in essence is a distasteful practice. It occupies other issues such as the issues of superiority and inferiority and blatant cruelty from the invading nation. What gives a nation the right to assume a group of people are governing themselves ineffectually? Even so, why should there be a need for war instead of peaceful dialogue or pressure in the form of moderate sanctions forcing a nation to treat its citizens better?

Despite all, humans will never lose imperialism. Just like how we are destined to always fight at a micro level of individuals against individuals, we are destined to attempt to take control other people. People with more power always desire even more power. However despite the inevitability of imperialism, we must always highlight the evil nature of such actions in any form.

Learn more about this author, Mark Mukasa.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.