Home > Politics, News & Issues > US Politics > Party Politics & Ideology
Results so far:
| Democratic | 61% | 199 votes | Total: 328 votes | |
| Republican | 39% | 129 votes |
Democratic
Created on: July 25, 2010 Last Updated: July 26, 2010
Deciphered: The Secret Republican Agenda
In broad strokes...Republicans want to return to the past to "solve" the very problems that brought us to today's poor economic climate.
House Republicans have now admitted what we've known for a long time: They intend to bring back the exact same George W. Bush agenda which drove our economy into the ditch. Admitted on Meet The Press.
The past led us to where we are today. Why would they want to go back?
Some Economic History: ( These are facts that can be verified. )
In 1993, President Clinton, a Democrat and Vice President Gore launched their economic strategy: (1) establishing fiscal discipline, eliminating the budget deficit, keeping interest rates low, and spurring private-sector investment; (2) investing in people through education, training, science, and research; and (3) opening foreign markets so American workers can compete abroad. After eight years, the results of President Clinton’s economic leadership are clear. Record budget deficits have become record surpluses, 22 million new jobs have been created, unemployment and core inflation are at their lowest levels in more than 30 years, and America is in the midst of the longest economic expansion in our history.
On Jan. 7, 2009, after 8 years of a Republican administration and two weeks before Obama took office, the CBO reported the deficit was projected to be $1.2 trillion. When Bush took office, the national debt, accumulated since the founding of the nation, stood at $5.6 trillion. By the time Bush left office, it exceed $11 trillion. In only eight years, he will have created more debt than all other U.S. presidents combined.
A graph ( http://zfacts.com/p/318.html ) shows the history of our National Debt as a percentage of GDP. A huge spike was created by the second world war which would be expected...but people had jobs. The debt decreased steadily from Truman to Jimmy Carter. As soon as Republican Ronald Reagan took office the national debt took a sharp climb upwards and continued until President Clinton ( Democrat ) took office. In the course of his term in office the debt declined and he built up a cash surplus. When George Bush took office in 2000, the debt took a sharp turn upwards, wiping out the Clinton surplus, and has not stopped yet.
According to Business Week, the average CEO of a major corporation made 42 times the average hourly worker's pay in 1980. By 1990 that had almost doubled to 85 times. In 2000, the average CEO salary reached an unbelievable 531 times that of the average hourly worker. The bad economy is never bad for these CEO's. As profits fall they fire workers and keep a bonus.
According to a recent study by University of California-Berkeley, the United States could lose as many as 14 million white-collar jobs as a result of the new outsourcing trend, and workers fortunate enough to hold onto their jobs will see decreasing wages and benefits as US companies try to keep pace with low-wage countries.
Corporations are driven by profit, not that profit is bad per se, provided that they maintain a balance between their profit motives and their impact on society and our economy. There must be an ethical and moral balance between profits and what is right for the nation in which they operate and prosper.
Enter Politics: Special Interest influence on elections and law-makers, both national and state.
There is a great site for delving into finance implications of politics called www.opensecrets.org where you can find out who gives what to influence campaigns and legislation. It is clear that both Democrats as well as Republicans accept campaign help from well-funded sources. To anyone in business it is also understood that businesses or organization will not spend money unless they have a reasonable expectation of a positive return on that investment. Supporting a political candidate with millions of dollars is no exception. These expenditures are a legal form of bribery not available to the average American. The money is spent and something of value is given in return...somewhere along the line, typically in the form of special consideration in legislation designed to protect those special interests and elevating those interests above those of the American citizen.
There are two broad categories of spenders in this system. Corporations and Labor Unions and related worker associations who speak for their membership. The first, answer to shareholders and are concerned with profits, not the well being of the American worker. Unions and similar associations as well as grass roots organizations, represent their membership, made up of and funded by millions of individual American citizens. An examination of the contributions will reveal that most contributions to Democrats are provided by American workers via various unions and worker supported associations. Republican's main source for funding comes from private corporations with profit driven motives, made of a wealthy few for which you and I can't vote.
While Republicans tend to lay claim to being the “fiscal conservative” party, history as shown above provides hard economic proof that the average worker and our economy often does more poorly when Republicans are in power than when Democrats have the helm. Clinton, (D) left us with 23 Million new jobs and a surplus while Bush (R) ate that surplus and replaced it with the largest deficit in the history of our nation and a net zero gain in jobs adjusted for increase in population. Not a fiscally responsible management of our economy.
But despite the down turn in the overall economy for the average American, large corporations have scored record profits. CEO's earn millions of dollars a year in compensation even as they lay off workers to save money. Wages and benefits, after all, are an expense to be avoided where possible. One trick is to send American jobs and factories overseas to cheap labor, eliminate any benefits and to avoid paying anything into our tax structure such as income taxes, social security and unemployment insurance. Many of these companies also receive tax incentives at the same time as they deport our jobs..incentives we have to pay for.
Labor organizations support American jobs working in America. They sponsor Democrats. Major corporations support low costs and high profits best served by sending work overseas or cutting salaries and benefits to American Workers...they support Republicans.
Supporting Republicans means support for deregulation and more corporate profits. Regulations are in place for one reason, to serve as the moral and ethical throttle on profit driven corporations who have only their self-interest at heart. Failed regulations under the Bush (and prior) administrations led to the near collapse of Wall Street, to the collapse of the housing market and even to the disastrous oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Corporations/Republicans hate regulations.
Taxes: Breaks and subsidies for the rich and their corporations.
As a result of President George W. Bush's $1.35 trillion tax break bill enacted into law in 2001 - a bill that was not paid for and that contributed greatly to the current federal deficit - heirs to multi-million and billion dollar fortunes are able to receive their entire inheritance free of federal taxes, costing at least $14.8 billion in lost revenue in 2010 alone.
Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) on the Senate floor said this, “And the Republican hypocrisy is about to advance to a whole new level. In the name of "fiscal responsibility" they are opposing virtually every effort to help the middle class and working families of our country. But, when it comes to the needs of millionaire and billionaire families, they have no problem reducing revenue by hundreds of billions of dollars. In other words, they are deficit hawks when it comes to the needs of ordinary people, but they are big spenders when it comes to the needs of the rich. “
The CBO and Congress' Joint Committee on Taxation said earlier this year that extending the original Bush-era tax cuts for the wealthy would increase budget deficits by $2.56 trillion during this decade. That money saved by the rich typically goes into savings or to purchase stocks and bonds and does not circulate to boost the economy. Unemployment benefits, on the other hand are spent immediately to buy food and pay rent and are circulated back into the economy at once. What they buy maintains and creates jobs.
Religion: Forget it. It plays no role in any of this other than it's underhanded manipulation by conservatives to seek support for their otherwise fiscally unsupportable policies. In no administration in history has yours or anyone else's religious freedoms ever been attacked by Congress or the President. But Republicans will lie and distort even religion to obtain their ultimate goal of converting the US to one controlled by and for the wealthy few at the expense of the rest of us.
Let's assemble some of this information and see what emerges in the form of a consistent pattern.
Despite claims used to “sell” their economic policies to the American people, Republicans claim to be the more responsible party when it comes to managing “our” tax dollars. History shows this is simply not true. In virtually every administration since Truman, it has been the Democrats who reduced deficits, lowered taxes and produced the most jobs. Fact.
When it comes to campaign support, Democrats are overwhelmingly supported by unions and other labor associations made up of average American Workers who are voters. Republicans get fat from private corporations none of which have a vote. Fact.
When it comes to regulating corporate behavior to protect the average American citizen, Republicans want to undo regulations and let business have free reign with our economy, much as they did under the Bush administration. Fact...admitted on Meet the Press by Republicans.
When this is distilled what we are left with is one party who's purpose in life is to assure that the rich get richer. That those wealthy owners are not regulated or in any way made to act in a moral or ethical manner that protects our economy and our jobs and worker safety.
The Republican party is currently playing games and trying to mess with the peoples minds. They are knowingly blocking the very actions necessary to start an economic recovery for one reason, the can look at voting history and see that dissatisfied voters often rebel against the incumbents simply out of anger or frustration. Republicans don't have a solution but they still want the power and are willing to damage our middle class to get it for their rich supporters. They actually count on voters voting against their own best interest out of anger, thus throwing our economy back to the same past that led us to our present recession.
Big business is on board with this plan and will spend millions to influence your vote. What they hope to gain is an environment devoid of regulations that will let them make as much money as possible in any way they can conceive with no regard to the consequences to our economy or your jobs or the public safety.
Their aim is the ultimate corporate welfare state where a few wealthy corporations can control and manipulate the nation and it's citizens to their financial advantage in a system where our voices simply will never matter.
If Republicans wrestle control back, look for these things to change or be attempted:
Roll back tax breaks for middle class while increasing tax breaks for the rich.
Roll back or even elimination of minimum wage, allowing corporations to hire those currently unemployed at third-world wages with few or no benefits.
Slave wages will mean even more will lose homes and retirement savings. People will be forced into credit they can't afford, becoming slaves to the “company store” as many were at the beginning of the last century.
No more health care for anyone but the rich.
Cuts or elimination of Social Security...and don't expect to even see what you already paid to be refunded...that will just vanish.
No more unemployment assistance if corporations decide to send your job to China or India leaving you without work.
No protections from corporate greed.
No more protections for worker safety.
No more voice in your own government. Corporations will pull all the strings via their Republican puppets.
These things are what make up the GOP Secret Agenda. Turning America into a corporate state where the average citizen is little more than a robot for the production of profits for a wealthy few who own and control the Republican party, thus the entire federal government.
Social Security Side Note: Republicans would love to repeal or drastically cut Social Security claiming it is bankrupt. But here are some facts you need to know.
Primarily financed by a 12.5% payroll tax split between the wage earner and the employer.
Pays monthly benefits to about 53 million Americans.
For 25 years has been taking in more that it pays out and now has a reserve of $2.5 Trillion Dollars.
During the current recession SSI has had to draw on those reserves due to high unemployment.
The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the reserve fund and payroll taxes will cover full payment of benefits for another 33 years. (Plenty of time to restore the economy if conservatives stop blocking provisions to do so.)
Learn more about this author, Paul Kruger.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Republican
Created on: July 26, 2010
Ha ha. Pick your poison.
I chose "Republican" because I used to believe they were actual fiscal conservatives. I was wrong. More on that later.
But, I could never choose "Democrat" in this argument. Democrats of long ago created the fiscal and monetary problems that are coming home to roost today, and today's Democrats are creating similar problems for future generations much more energetically, and on a much larger scale, than their predecessors. They should never be rewarded for it. I happen to believe they should cease to exist as a party. At best, they should be a permanent minority.
The history is irrefutable. The FDR Administration produced Social Security, which started off well but was tweaked many times by subsequent administrations to become the ingeniously diabolical Ponzi scheme we have now. Lyndon Baines Johnson produced Medicare in the 1960s', which, in terms of taxation, funding and disbursement of benefit payments, is structured fundamentally the same as Social Security. The important difference between Medicare and Social Security is that Medicare is now in its third year of spending down its Trust Fund, because its revenues are not enough to cover its costs, so it is much further along the road to insolvency than Social Security.
I know the programs and the politicians who brought them to life were, at least ostensibly, well-intentioned. These would have been wildly successful, self-funding programs today if their revenues had been managed properly and invested conservatively. In reality, because of political expediency and greed, they were actually turned into horrifically expensive pyramid schemes to swell the general fund (so Congress had more to spend) while the taxpaying public was hoodwinked into paying for them twice. (See my helium.com article on Social Security for more details.)
It's true that, thanks to higher tax rates, the so-called "peace dividend" that occurred after the fall of the Soviet Union, and the mid-1990s so-called "Internet bubble", the Clinton Administration was able to boast a federal budget surplus for four years. I'm sure that, even though the surplus was burning a hole in the pockets of Congress and Bill Clinton himself, they just had no idea about what to spend the money on. During a State of the Union address ( I believe it was 1999), Clinton enthusiastically shouted that the surplus should be used to "Save Social Security". Of course, that did not happen.
Along comes George W. Bush in 2001. Federal deficit spending is a thing of the past. Then 9/11 happens and our economy takes a HUGE hit. The Bush Administration passes temporary tax cuts, starts borrowing and spending feverishly and the next thing you know, they're not just running a deficit, they're running RECORD deficits. So much for Republican fiscal conservatism.
Well, I'm not an economist. I know there are conservatives in many disciplines, including politics, journalism and economics who believe that, yes, there are times and situations which call for some deficit spending by the government. They look at government debt as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product and use that as a gauge to determine the economy's overall health, as well as its ability to repay that debt in the future. But now that the US has a debt-to-GDP ratio of more than 90 percent (and climbing), there are some experts who believe the United States of America will never be able to repay all her creditors. That could reduce or prevent future borrowing, which could then lead to deficit spending fueled by an increase in the money supply (inflation). It could get really ugly.
So, as the post-9/11 economy was recovering nicely, deregulation in the financial world was creating opportunities for institutions and individual financial gurus to make obscene profits through never-before-seen complex investment schemes, and allowing people who couldn't really afford big, expensive homes through conventional financing to buy way over their heads with never-before-seen mutant mortgages.
That bomb went off at the end of the Bush Administration, and so along comes Obama. By the way, Obama and his henchmen NEVER miss an opportunity to say that they INHERITED this mess, but I think it's important to always bear the facts in mind. That is to say that Obama EAGERLY SOUGHT his current position and having won it, proudly and willingly took on all its burdens, which is not quite the same thing as, for example, being bequeathed a home in tax arrears by a deceased ancestor. Inherited? Not really. Just political BS.
Anyway, Obama slams the pedal to the metal and begins bailing out so-called "too big to fail" enterprises by buying government stakes in banks, many of whose employees and officials laid the groundwork for the economic disaster, and the unionized auto companies, who'd let themselves be raped by the UAW on salary and health benefits. To their credit, Ford Motor Company refused the bailout and managed to survive.
He also enacted trifling tax cuts, more for the psychological effect and political benefit than to help taxpayers, and was soon spending 4 deficit dollars for every 1 spent by his predecessor Bush. Obama's deficits are almost incalculably huge, and increased the overall public debt by fully one-third in just his first year in office! And that bill falls squarely on the shoulders of taxpayers for generations to come. The problem is, all that spending has not produced the desired result Obama and his crew continually assure us it will.
So, yeah, jobs have got to be Obama's Numero Uno priority because people have got to work to pay the taxes to pay down the huge tab he's running up.
In all seriousness, a simple, yet strong, Constitutional Amendment is needed to limit the ability of the Executive and Legislative branches of our government to borrow and spend money, because neither the Republican nor the Democratic Party has the real political will to control government over-spending. It may, indeed, already be too late.
July 25, 2010
Learn more about this author, Chris Messner.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.