No

• 1 of 10

  by Kathy Myers

  Created on: December 11, 2009

  As an educator I have seen many changes in education over the past 23 years.  The amount of time

• 2 of 10

  by Sylvia Harrison

  Created on: September 26, 2009

  Should schools require more rigorous testing of students to determine literacy levels?
  
  Absolutely not.

• 3 of 10

  by Ernest Capraro

  Created on: June 30, 2009

  It could almost be a joke, testing as rigorously as possible for the sake of improving education. Almost

• 4 of 10

  by Daniel Onyango

  Created on: April 12, 2009   Last Updated: September 07, 2009

  Due to the structure, rather than the message in the above statement, alarm signals could be raised

• 5 of 10

  by Betty Anderson

  Created on: June 29, 2009   Last Updated: July 04, 2009

  No, is my answer to the idea of schools rigorously testing students to see where they are

• 6 of 10

  by Chris Leahy

  Created on: June 09, 2009   Last Updated: June 19, 2009

  Should schools require more rigorous testing of students to determine literacy levels?

  In any location

• 7 of 10

  by Jane Mays-Evans

  Created on: March 02, 2009

  No More Testing more testing

  In no way, shape, or form should schools require more rigorous testing to

• 8 of 10

  by Sarah Michelson

  Created on: February 13, 2009   Last Updated: March 30, 2009

  Standardized testing, especially at a young age, is not a successful method of measuring literacy. Many

• 9 of 10

  by The Oley School

  Created on: July 13, 2008

  While literacy is very important for humans to function on a daily basis, do we really need more tests

• 10 of 10

  by Zev Percowitz

  Created on: July 13, 2008

  Test is a four letter word for good reason: it only challenges a temporary result. The testing criteria