Search Helium

Home > Sciences > Biology > Biology (Other)

Should men be allowed to be pregnant and conceive babies?

Results so far:

Yes
35% 619 votes Total: 1758 votes
No
65% 1139 votes

Yes

by Jason Hernandez

Created on: June 04, 2008   Last Updated: October 22, 2009

Let me borrow a slogan from the feminist pro-choice movement: "Keep your laws off my body!" The idea behind it is that a woman should not be forced to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term; that a pregnancy deeply affects her body, and no one else has the right to dictate what happens to her body.

This school of thought sees choice in pregnancy as an integral part of freeing women from the oppression of centuries. Male pregnancy is simply the other side of the coin. If we already have sexual reassignment, in which a person born in a man's body can have it changed into a female body, or the reverse, then clearly the boundaries between genders, and more importantly gender roles, are not so cut-and-dried as was once thought.

Add to this the increasing recognition of intersexed people - that is, people with both male and female physical characteristics - and it no longer makes sense to insist on rigid gender divisions. Most intersexed people function only as one or the other - a boy affected by the former anti-miscarriage drug Depo, born with female genitalia, is still a boy.

Likewise, a girl affected by in utero exposure to androgens, with vestigial testes, is still a girl. But in extremely rare cases, there are born fully-functional hermaphrodites, that is, intersexed people with two complete sets of reproductive organs, one male, one female.

On one of my online forums, I read a post written by such a person. Although she identified as female, during her puberty, she had several "virgin" pregnancies - that is, her male reproductive system spontaneously impregnated her female one. Those pregnancies all ended in miscarriage, but they do show what is possible.

Would we debate whether a fully intersexed person "should be allowed" to get pregnant? Sadly, I fear many people would - those who fear whatever is different from what they are used to. That, I am convinced, is the only reason there are so many more articles written on the "no" side of this debate: people experience a visceral shock reaction, and form opinions accordingly.

One would think that in these times, when the role of fatherhood is being re-examined, there would be more enlightened thought about this. We are coming to recognize that a man can be as nurturing with his children as a woman. Many children have warm, close relationships with their fathers, or with suitable father-substitutes.

That leaves the question of breastfeeding. Even if we did not have infant milk replacement formula, it is known that with the proper stimulation, men are capable of lactation.

Ever since I was a child, my mother used to tell me the story of a man lost in the Australian outback with his baby; he pacified the baby's crying by putting it up to his breast and letting it suck, and by the time they were rescued, he was producing milk.

So the only remaining obstacles are

(1) that men lack a uterus and ova, and

(2) that men's pelvic bones are not wide enough to allow a baby's head to pass.

But the second problem is solved by the straightforward expedient of Caesarian section, a common enough procedure even in female pregnancy. So if a viable uterus could be surgically implanted, I see no reason why he should not be allowed to use it for its intended purpose. So, all you men out there who would like to get pregnant, join the pro-choice feminists in their battle cry, "Keep your laws off my body!"

Learn more about this author, Jason Hernandez.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.

No

by Jimmy Nightingale

Created on: May 08, 2008   Last Updated: May 20, 2011

John Cleese once said: "Where's the foetus going to take, are you going to keep it in a box?" ('Life of Brian, 1979)

The image that immediately come to mind is twofold - a man pregnant, and worse, a man delivering a baby.  Not pretty.  In 'Life of Brian' the issue arose when Cleese's Peoples Front of Judea colleague, the gender confused Loretta/Stan declared that he wanted to become a woman so that he could have babies.  Obviously it is not as simple as that, there is the little question of biology.  This was resolved in 'Life of Brian' by arguing that Loretta/Stan should have the right to have babies.

Pointless?  Perhaps for now, but with the extraordinary advances in medical research, it may become possible in the future.  If you were able to travel back in time, things that we take for granted now, say heart transplants, in-vitro fertilisation, joint replacement, even something like epidural anaesthesia, would have seemed impossible, in the realm of science fiction.

In 1992, the Weekly World News published a story, 'Man Gives Birth to a Healthy Baby Boy!' (7th July) about Karl Holzer, a man in Frankfurt, Germany who apparently gave birth.  It was sensationalized in the media and appeared in tabloids everywhere.  The problem is that Karl was noted as being a hermaphrodite, someone with both male and female sex organs.  Although his birth certificate may have noted him as being male, that wasn't quite the case.  When we think about the prospect of a man being able to conceive and have a baby, we would tend to think of someone with just male sex organs being able to do this.  Karl's example, if true, is tantamount to cheating.

More recently, we had the case of Taiwanese man, Lee Mingwei.  No gender sleight of hand here.  This was a man purported to be pregnant by way of a revolutionary piece of biotechnology pioneered by a firm called GenoChoice, which basically involved implanting an embryo in Mr Mingwei's abdominal cavity.  At term, the baby would be delivered by caesarian section.  The link appears to be monitoring Mr Mingwei's pregnancy under the professional auspices of RYT Hospital/Dwayne Medical Center. 

It all looks very convincing.  At least until you start digging.  You quickly discover that Lee Migwei's pregnancy is nothing more than elaborate hoax perpetrated by artists Virgil Wong and Lee Mingwei.  The websites for Lee Mingwei, GenoChoice and RYT Hospital were all created by Wong and it is basically a multidisciplinary art project.  It is an urban legend, albeit a rather good one.

Some scientists have argued that it would be theoretically possible under a controlled set of conditions.  This would mean that the embryo would need to be implanted somewhere other than the female uterus.  When this occurs in women, it is called an ectopic pregnancy.  About 98 percent of ectopic pregnancies occur in the fallopian tubes on the way to the uterus.  A very small number occur in the abdominal cavity, however most of these either naturally miscarry or are absorbed by the woman's body.  Therefore, with the right circumstances, it could be theoretically possible for a man to carry an embryo in his abdominal cavity.

The elephant in the room is the simple fact that there is no instance of healthy full term baby being born from an ectopic pregnancy.  Even an early ectopic pregnancy (5 to 8 weeks) often requires major abdominal surgery and the risks of hemorrhaging are high and potentially life threatening.  As the baby grows, these risks grow commensurately and any possible benefits of a man being able to conceive babies would be cancelled out by the risks.  In all likelihood, both mother (or father) and baby would die.

In time and with further advances in medical technology, these risks may be able to be appropriately managed and it could be possible for a man to be pregnant and conceive babies.  Other than the kudos of being able to claim this medical first and the dubious consideration of a man being able to experience childbirth first hand, the practical applicaiton of such an advance doesn't make sense.  Roughly half our population has, at some stage in their lives, the biological machinery to be able to be pregnant and conceive babies without the need for such excessive risk or medical trickery.  Just because something may eventually be able to be done, doesn't mean it should be. 

Or as John Cleese would say, "What's the point?".

Learn more about this author, Jimmy Nightingale.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.


CONNECT WITH US

Read
our blog
Helum for writers

Write and get published
Share with other writers
Polish your freelancing skills

Join our active writing community
Helium Content Source for Publishers

Quality articles from proven freelancers
Exclusive rights, fast turnaround
Brand engagement, business blogging -- our writers do it all

Get custom content today!

INFORMATION


Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA