Search Helium

Home > Business > Management > Management (Other)

Women in leadership positions: Must they work harder?

Results so far:

Yes
74% 589 votes Total: 794 votes
No
26% 205 votes

Yes

by T. Scott Randolph

Created on: March 31, 2009

It is with a sad heart that I had to vote for the yes side of this debate. I do think that woman do have to work harder to prove them selves to the "old guard" and to new male counterparts that are, for want of a better term, idiots.

I am not really sure of the date, that is a sad admission on my part since I went to college to teach history, but I do seem to remember there were some pretty specific laws set up to make sure that woman and or minorities groups would recieve the same chance for a job, promotion, and raises. That being said, I think we all know that that isn't the case in this great land of ours.

Way to many times there have been statements made as to why a woman was given a certain position in a company. If they were the same questions put to their male counterparts than it wouldn't be nearly as bad.

Woman tend to get very nastily stereotyped into positions when they become someones boss. They are gay, have slept their way into that position or some other such nonsense. It does not occur to the people that make such statements that woman are just as capable as men to be leaders in any branch of the work force.

In the 6 years that I served in the U.S. Marines, I met many woman that were in extreme leadership positions. Because of their job, most people would not dare to make statements that are made in the civilian sectors.

So, while I wish it weren't true, I do think woman do have to work harder when they are in leadership positions. Even though I think it has gotten much better in the last 15 to 20 years, we still haven't solved the problem. This is all without even discussing the fact that currently woman in the state of Illinois (according to recent work poster in the office where I work) woman make around 78 cents to every dollar an man will make. So not only do they work harder and have to prove themselves, they do it for less money.

The one bright side that I can see in all of this is that at least the times have changed enough that woman are getting into the leadership positions that were closed off to them in the not to distant past. Wasn't it just 50 plus years ago that a "professional" woman really just consisted of a position of a secretary for some guy in an office who did nothing while she did all the work. Thank heavens at least we have made some advances since the "dark ages" anyway.

So yes, until the human race "evolves" a little more, I do think, unfortunately for the woman, they do and probably will for the near future have to work harder to prove themselves.

Learn more about this author, T. Scott Randolph.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.

No

by Arrey Echi

Created on: June 08, 2010

Leadership usually refers to the state or position of being a leader, in command. It is generally held that men are genetically qualified to assume leadership positions. This notion is especially very true when leadership is viewed within the family context. This is because leadership within the family is divinely attributed to the man. The exception is in single parent families where the lone parent is a woman. This does not mean that women are considered to be any lesser than men. It is basically for the sake of peace and harmony within the family. Thus a family where the man exercises his leadership in a loving and considerate manner is bound to remain happy and united. The reverse is also very true.

Looking at leadership in the office environment as the topic implies is a different matter. Men, as noted are traditionally considered to be born leaders. As such, a woman who finds herself at the helm of an institution could generally conclude and often wrongly that this implies she has to work harder than her male counterpart. The reasons highlighted below argue the point in the negative. Over the centuries, women have been relegated to the background. Most often than not, they have been seen as fit for nothing except domestic work and child bearing which is often termed women’s triple roles; reproduction, production and nurturing. However, the advent of feminism and women’s movement challenged this view. Many women were now able to obtain an education in which they excelled. Yet, they were still confined to subjects which was highly believed could help them carry out their triple roles or biological responsibilities. Notwithstanding, many girls still dared to brave the exclusive male domains and today we have women proving their worth ,demonstrating leadership capabilities and making valuable contributions in sciences, technology, medicine, literature, journalism etc.

These women worked hard to be where they are today. They were still in most cases discriminated against in the job market. Many women could easily be refused work or denied promotions because they have little children at home. It was automatically believed that this made it impossible for them to work longer hours or take work assignments. Asking for maternity leave in some places was a case in point. As such, most were easily employed in so called easy to perform jobs like teaching, nursing, secretary, office clerks, and so forth. Many women pursued higher education in an attempt to break this stereotype and prove that women can also have and keep executive jobs. The world job market today proves that these women were right as you find CEOs and top executives in most companies to be women.

Unfortunately, living by the adage that ‘what a man can do a woman can do ten times better,’ many women have the misguided notion that; when they reach the top they have to work extra harder than their male counterparts just to keep the job. It is a sad reality that many of these women do that to the detriment of their health and family. They have the educational qualifications, the work expertise and some are even more proficient than their male counterparts. If the men do not need to work extra hard to keep their jobs because they are in a leadership position and with usually the same qualifications why should the women do? True, being in a leadership position calls for extra work but this should be for all concerned not for women only. With the above mentioned arguments, the conclusion is that women in leadership positions do not need to work extra harder. Their being in control shows they have proved their worth already there is therefore no need to work extra harder than their male colleagues in similar positions.


Learn more about this author, Arrey Echi.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.


CONNECT WITH US

Read
our blog
Helum for writers

Write and get published
Share with other writers
Polish your freelancing skills

Join our active writing community
Helium Content Source for Publishers

Quality articles from proven freelancers
Exclusive rights, fast turnaround
Brand engagement, business blogging -- our writers do it all

Get custom content today!

INFORMATION


Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA