Home > Parenting & Pregnancy > Parenting Styles > Parenting Styles (Other)
Results so far:
| No | 12% | 42 votes | Total: 339 votes | |
| Yes | 88% | 297 votes |
No
Created on: November 13, 2009 Last Updated: November 16, 2009
The essence of this argument is that there is a gap to be filled. Although there certainly are lazy dads who can pull more weight, the same can be said of the moms. There have and always will be fathers that make excellent caregivers and are much more nurturing than their female counterpart. The fact is that the gap is not the fault of individual people but, of society, as a whole.
Our culture is built on an antiquated model where division of the sexes was essential. Men were hunters and women were nurturers in every sense of the word. This was mandated by the fact that women gave birth and had to breast feed and were, therefore, bound to a geographic location. There was no birth control and no modern medicine. People did not live long and there was no shortage of children and infirm to be taken care of. In the mean time, they needed to eat and so somebody had to leave the homestead to find, capture, and kill the food.
But, times have changed. Human needs have evolved to such a degree that aside from giving birth to the child, it is possible for either sex to do any, all, or none of the tasks essential to survival. The only thing that has not changed is human perception of societal norms and obligations based on gender.
Even a few decades ago it was possible for just one spouse to financial support the family. These days both parents pretty much have to work. It isn't a choice. We are having less kids and it costs more to sustain them.
But, with both parents at work, who is going to fill the gap? Homes still need to be cleaned, laundry to be done, meals to be prepared, children to be nurtured... not to mention, carted around to and from school and a multitude of after-curricular activities.
For a couple of decades people tried to fill this void with TV dinners and fast food, with electronic babysitters, and just plain neglect. There were always grumblings but, what could we do? Fortunately, the glass ceiling is cracking.
Even though women had entered the workforce, few were given positions of true power. Now that the second most powerful position in the most powerful super nation in the world is occupied by a woman, we can start to talk about true change.
Yes, women are overloaded, under appreciated, and suffocating under a load of often conflicting responsibilities. But, the answer is not to shift the same load between the sexes. This is not a gender issue. It is one of socioeconomic revolution.
The 9-to-5, five days a week at the office, rigidity of modern business does not work. Women cannot, and should not be expected to spend more time away from their children than they spend with them. Flexible schedules, teleworking, reduced work weeks, and on-site daycare are all effective ways of bridging gaps. Why not look at the system, instead of pointing fingers at scapegoats?
Learn more about this author, Freyda Tartak.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Yes
Created on: January 06, 2009
There is no reason that men can't be involved in childcare. With male or female childcare, if they are not licensed then I would be careful of their background and pay to have a background check done. If you can't afford that, then at least look up their name on-line in the sex and violent offender registry that ever state in the U.S. keeps on-line for free. The old-fashioned ideals that women stay at home and work there while men go out and earn the living just don't apply to life in America anymore. If a woman can be physically capable of working construction or in the steel industry, then why can't a man be emotionally capable of childcare or other previously deemed womens jobs. In todays world, we have male nurses, male secretaries, male tailors rather than just seamstresses. We have women who do roofing, automotive work, factory work, and so many other jobs that were deemed exclusively male professions not more than 100 years ago. I believe that anyone who has a general love of children and the patience for dealing with multiple children at a time should be perfectly capable of performing the job. If it is a question of whether or not one should hire a male as their form of childcare, that is up to the family members and should be decided amongst the family.
As far as in a home environment where the couple may work different shifts and there is a controversy between the two about whether or not the man should watch the child or children while the woman works, this is all based on a few key factors. First of all, are you in a financial situation where you can't afford a babysitter or any other means of childcare. Secondly, how does the man do with the child or children.
If you are not in a financial situation to afford childcare and you need the second income to make ends meet, then yes the man should cover that time. However, if you are not in that kind of financial situation and the man does well with the child or children then it should be at the digression of the couple. Also, if you are not in a poor financial situation and the man does poorly with the children, then outside childcare should be paid for for the sake of the children.
As with most things in the area of parenting and childcare, most of this revolves around the family and the situation that the family is in. Discuss it and take into consideration all factors before coming to a decision, what works for someone else's family may not work for yours and vice versa. Just think about it and talk about it with your family.
Learn more about this author, Jennifer Geurian.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.