No

• 1 of 9

  by Raymond Alexander Kukkee

  Created on: May 06, 2008   Last Updated: August 01, 2008

  Political Correctness gone Too Far

  Shall we laugh now, or later? I do not believe this question should

• 2 of 9

  by Shawn Wells

  Created on: October 17, 2010   Last Updated: October 19, 2010

  Call a spade a spade, is an old adage with current implications.  In many ways we, society as a

• 3 of 9

  by PracticalPhilosophy

  Created on: October 18, 2010   Last Updated: October 19, 2010

  Should the media refrain from using the term “terrorist” for the sake of objectivity and

• 4 of 9

  by Michael Schwoerer

  Created on: April 17, 2010

  No they should not it is for what it is. An act of extreme violence to harm many humans regardless of

• 5 of 9

  by R.A. Scott

  Created on: August 25, 2008   Last Updated: April 22, 2011

  How are the media supposed to maintain all aspects of neutrality when there is something so deep and

• 6 of 9

  by Frances Taylor

  Created on: July 20, 2008

  The word terrorist can and should be used by the media as a way to describe a perpetrator of acts of

• 7 of 9

  by Donna Pampalone

  Created on: September 18, 2010   Last Updated: September 20, 2010

  Should the media refrain from using the term "terrorist" for the sake of objectivity and neutrality?

• 8 of 9

  by Gary Sacco

  Created on: July 14, 2008

  In this era of sloppy, schlocky media sources, the last thing Americans need is for news to be sanitized

• 9 of 9

  by Eric Lannak

  Created on: April 17, 2008   Last Updated: September 21, 2008

  The suggestion that the media should refrain from using the term "terrorist" for the sake of objectivity