Title endorsed in part by:
Results so far:
| No | 56% | 62 votes | Total: 111 votes | |
| Yes | 44% | 49 votes |
It depends what you mean by easy. Your carbon footprint doesn't just depend on what you EAT. It depends on what you do with the rest of your life. If you own five gas guzzling cars, don't have any insulation in your house, and fly to Bali three times a year then maybe you need to address these issues first. So my first response to this question is 'no'.
If you're serious about reducing your carbon footprint you need to have some idea of what your carbon emissions are at the moment. Find a carbon calculator on the Internet. There are lots to choose from. Here's a household one from Participant Media. You type in some information about your home, your energy use, your lifestyle and food choices and it does the sums for you. If you need to you can also get hold of one which measures emissions in your business premises.
If you get this far - you're building up a picture of which activities and purchases in your life produce the most carbon. That's going to help you in deciding where to start to reduce your emissions. Now you can start PRIORITISING. That's important. Saving energy and staying warm might be a priority for you. So you might want to put tackle draughtproofing in your home even before you start changing your food choices.
Becoming a vegetarian might indeed be one of your options though. We know there are lots of good reasons for taking this step. Not least the arguments about meat production and cruelty to animals. But as far as your emissions are concerned, be careful. If you're buying imported fruit and vegetables that have been shipped by air half-way across the planet you're probably not going to be doing much to slow down Climate Change.
Also, let's face it - it's sometimes really hard to make big changes in your life. So make the issues person-sized instead. Take a small step. Instead of doing away with meat altogether together, can you start eating LESS of it? Can you buy local, organically reared meat with a high standard of welfare? I'm quite a good cook but I love the taste of organic meat. So I wouldn't find it easy to make the switch.
What other options are there? Why not join me as a member of the world wide community of kitchen gardeners. It's not so difficult to teach yourself how to grow your own fruit and vegetables - in your own backyard.Then you can save food miles and carbon emissions without giving up meat entirely. Keeps us fit, reduces carbon emissions and saves money too. Once you savour the fresh taste of your home produced organic fruit and vegetables you may find yourself becoming vegetarian anyway!
Learn more about this author, Frances Laing.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
More than 10 billion cows, pigs, chickens, turkeys, and other farmed animals are confined to factory farms every year in the United States alone. The process of turning these animals into "beef," "pork," and "poultry" is taking a terrible toll on the Earth.
The 414-page United Nations report Livestock's Long Shadow concluded that the livestock sector is "one of the top two or three most significant contributors to the most serious environmental problems, at every scale from local to global." The report suggested that the livestock industry should be "a major policy focus when dealing with problems of land degradation, climate change and air pollution, water shortage and water pollution, and loss of biodiversity."
Meat Is the Number One Cause of Global Warming
According to the U.N. report, raising animals for food generates more greenhouse-gas emissions than all the cars, trucks, trains, ships, and planes in the world combined. The livestock sector is one of the largest sources of carbon dioxide and the single largest source of both methane and nitrous oxide emissions. Nitrous oxide is about 300 times more potent as a global warming gas than carbon dioxide. According to the U.N., the meat, egg, and dairy industries account for a staggering 65 percent of worldwide nitrous oxide emissions.
Environmen tal experts are encouraging people to eat a vegetarian diet or at least cut back on the amount of meat and other animal products that they consume. On its Web site, Environmental Defense estimates, "If every American skipped one meal of chicken per week and substituted vegetables and grains the carbon dioxide savings would be the same as taking more than half a million cars off of U.S. roads. If every American had one meat-free meal per week, it would be the same as taking more than 5 million cars off our roads. Having one meat-free day per week would be the same as taking 8 million cars off American roads."
Imagine what kind of difference you'd be making if you never ate meat. Researchers at the University of Chicago determined that switching to a vegan (pure vegetarian) diet is more effective in countering global warming than switching from a standard American car to a Toyota Prius. The researchers, Gidon Eshel and Pamela Martin, compared the amount of fossil fuel needed to cultivate and process various foods, including running machinery, providing food for animals, and irrigating crops. They found that the typical U.S. meat-eater generates nearly 1.5 tons more carbon dioxide per person per year than a vegan does. By comparison, if you traded a gas-guzzling vehicle for a state-of the-art hybrid, the CO2 savings would only be slightly more than 1 ton.
The Live Earth Global Warming Survival Handbook: 77 Essential Skills To Stop Climate Change by David de Rothschild the official companion volume to the worldwide Live Earth concertsstates that "refusing meat" is "the single most effective thing you can do to reduce your carbon footprint."
Of course, your carbon footprint is not the only thing you reduce when you stop eating meat. There's your waistline for one, but I'm referring to your impact on the environment as a whole. Meat, egg, and dairy production is detrimental to the environment in many ways. When you consider all the manure produced by billions of animals and all the extra energy needed to grow food for the animals; operate the feed mills, factory farms, slaughterhouses, and meat-processing plants; and transport the feed, animals, and meat to their various destinations, you can see why animal agriculture is much less sanitary and more energy-intensive than plant agriculture. Vegetarians tread lighter on the Earthin terms of helping to conserve resources and improve air and water quality and fighting world hunger and deforestation.
Food for Thought: A Comparison Between Meat-Based and Plant-Based Diets
Nearly half of the water used in the U.S. is squandered on animal agriculture. Between watering the crops grown to feed farmed animals, providing drinking water for billions of animals each year, and cleaning up the filth in factory farms, transport trucks, and slaughterhouses, the farmed-animal industry places a serious strain on our water supply.
It takes approximately 2,500 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of meat but only 25 gallons to produce 1 pound of wheat. More than 4,000 gallons of water per day are required to produce a meat-based diet, but only 300 gallons of water a day are needed to produce a totally vegetarian diet.
John Robbins, the heir to the Baskin-Robbins ice cream empire and famed author of Diet for a New America and The Food Revolution, contends that you can save more water by not eating a pound of beef than by not showering for an entire year.
On the subject of water, the Environmental Protection Agency has reported that factory farms pollute our waterways more than all other industrial sources combined. Animals raised for food produce approximately 130 times as much excrement as the entire human population87,000 pounds per second. A Scripps Howard synopsis of a Senate Agricultural Committee report on farm pollution issued this warning about animal waste: "[I]t's untreated and unsanitary, bubbling with chemicals and diseased. It goes onto the soil and into the water that many people will, ultimately, bathe in and wash their clothes with and drink. It is poisoning rivers and killing fish and making people sick. Catastrophic cases of pollution, sickness, and death are occurring in areas where livestock operations are concentrated. Every place where the animal factories have located, neighbors have complained of falling sick."
A study by Duke University Medical Center showed that people living downwind of pig farms are more likely to suffer from tension, depression, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, headaches, shallow breathing, coughing, sleep disturbances, and loss of appetite.
Not only does meat production pollute our water and air, it also desecrates our land. It takes 3 1/4 acres of land to produce food for a meat-eater, compared to only 1/6 of an acre of land to produce food for a vegan. According to the U.N., livestock production accounts for 70 percent of all agricultural land and 30 percent of the land surface of the planet. The aforementioned U.N. report states that the "[e]xpansion of livestock production is a key factor in deforestation, especially in Latin America, where the greatest amount of deforestation is occurring70 percent of previous forested land in the Amazon is occupied by pastures, and feedcrops cover a large part of the remainder."
Approxima tely 55 square feet of tropical rain forests may be razed to produce just one quarter-pound hamburger. Greenpeace has criticized KFC and other companies that sell chicken for growing feed in the Amazon. More than 2.9 million acres of the Amazon rain forest were destroyed in the 2004-2005 crop season in order to grow food for chickens and other farmed animals. Deforestation is a problem in the U.S. too. More than 260 million acres of U.S. forests have been cleared to create cropland to grow grain to feed farmed animals. Around 1.4 billion people could be fed with the grain and soybeans fed to U.S. cattle alone.
Instead of funneling food through farmed animals, we could feed it directly to hungry, malnourished people. It would take just 40 million tons of food to eliminate the most extreme cases of world hunger, yet farmed animals in Western countries are fed 540 million tons of food every year. Cows, pigs, chickens, and other farmed animals eat more than 70 percent of the corn, wheat, and other grains grown in the U.S. The world's cattle alone consume an amount of food equal to the caloric needs of 8.7 billion peoplemore than the entire human population.
According to the WorldWatch Institute, "[M]eat consumption is an inefficient use of grainthe grain is used more efficiently when consumed by humans. Continued growth in meat output is dependent on feeding grain to animals, creating competition for grain between affluent meat-eaters and the world's poor."
It takes about 700 calories worth of feed to produce just one 100-calorie piece of beef.
A 2002 E Magazine article estimated that the feed cost of an 8-ounce steak would fill 45 to 50 bowls with cooked cereal grains.
Ending the Energy Crisis One Bite at a Time
And when you think about all the energy-intensive stages that are required to get animals from the farm to the supermarket, you'll understand why going vegetarian makes sense. More than one-third of all fossil fuels produced in the U.S. are used to raise animals for food. Each stage of meat, egg, and dairy production involves heavy pollution, generates greenhouse gases, and requires massive amounts of energy:
1. Grow massive amounts of grains and soybeans (including tilling, irrigation, crop dusters, and so on) for feed
2. Transport the grain and soybeansin gas-guzzling, pollution-spewing 18-wheelers
to feed manufacturers
3. Operate the feed mills
4. Transport the feed to the factory farms
5. Operate the factory farms
6. Truck the animals many miles to slaughter
7. Operate the slaughterhouses
8. Transport the meat (in refrigerated trucks) to processing plants
9. Operate the meat-processing plants
10. Transport the meat to grocery stores
11. Keep the meat refrigerated or frozen in the stores until it's sold
While some of these stages are needed for plant foods, a vegan diet eliminates the need for factory farms, slaughterhouses, and multiple tractor-trailer trips. The giant trawlers used by the fishing industry also require a lot of fossil fuels. Fish farms aren't any better. In fact, they're worsefarmed fish eat fish caught by commercial trawlers. It takes about 4 pounds of wild-caught fish to produce just 1 pound of farmed fish.
Overall, it takes 11 times as much fossil fuel to produce a gram of animal protein as it does to produce a gram of plant protein.
Eating to Save the Earth
Nothing good comes from meat production. Tasty and nutritious mock meats, nondairy milks, and egg alternatives can be produced without any animals. By going vegan, you can help save the Earth and all its inhabitants; each vegetarian saves more than 100 animals every year. For more information (and a free copy of PETA's "Vegetarian Starter Kit"), see the "Meat and the Environment" section of GoVeg.com.
Learn more about this author, Heather Moore.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.