Get a Widget for this title
RSS FeedShould there be tougher penalties for dangerous soccer tackles?
Results so far:
| No | 37% | 20 votes | Total: 54 votes | |
| Yes | 63% | 34 votes |
No
Write now
Print
Invite a writer™
Add to FavoritesFIFA has already set down the laws of the game, and have set the penalties to be issued by referees when a dangerous tackle is made. This penalty is either a free kick or a penalty, a yellow card or red card. With a straight red card there is also an additional punishment of a suspension from the game. I beleive that these sanctions are sufficient, and in general a three match ban for commiting a foul worthy of a straight red is an apt punishment.
In the world of football there is a huge difference between a tackle and a foul. Football is a contact sport, and tackling is a part of the game. There is nothing worse in my opinion to see a defender making a great tackle on an attacking player, winning the ball cleanly and yet penalised because the tackle came from behind or because the attacker fell over the legs of the defender after the ball was cleared.
At the same time there is nothing better than seeing a last ditch tackle being made to save a certain goal. The FA Cup from the 2007-2008 season showed when Distin tackled Carrick on the line. Look back thirty years to the time of Norman Hunter, Tommy Smith or "Chopper" Harris, in today's game they would have been suspended for more games than they played, and yet in essence they were hard men but they knew how to tackle.
In the whole history of the game I can think of only a couple of times when I think a tackler has gone in with the deliberate intention of hurting the opposing player. When this happens it is fairly obvious as the tackler will have little thought for the ball and his eyes will be on the man. One of these occurrences happened in the Portsmouth-Man City game from a couple of seasons ago. These tackles should be dealt with through an extended ban, longer than the normal three-game suspension for a red card.
These occurrences though are the exception; most players will know that a bad tackle can cause the end of a career, and that they could easily be on the end of such a tackle. As such if a bad foul is made then the referee on the pitch should deal with it, be it a yellow card or red. If the referee misses it then it should be left to video replays to deal with the offence.
I know that players get injured when they are fouled, and yet players also get injured in some of the most innocuous of challenges. Eduardo suffered a broken leg after a foul by Martin Taylor, and there were calls from certain circles to ban Taylor for life, and yet it wasn't even the worst tackle in the game. Yes it was worthy of a red card, and that was what Taylor received, and deserved nothing more.
There are many worse things in the modern game than a bad foul, I would much rather see tackles being made with the occasional foul rather than see players diving in an attempt to get an opposing player sent off, or to feign injury. As such tackles should remain, and dangerous fouls should be dealt with in the manner they are at the moment, a ban from playing is enough of a punishment, and extended bans should only be given out for those players who on rare occurrences set out to injury an opponent.
Learn more about this author, Tim Harry.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Yes
After reading about the dangerous football [soccer] tackles in the BBC Sports Website and after seeing the Website of Victoria Derbyshire with her interview with FIFA President Sepp Blatter, I have decided that there should be tougher penalties for dangerous football [soccer] tackles. While football [soccer] is a contact sport like most sports are and we can only protect ourselves to an extent, there has to be a rule by FIFA and other governing bodies of football [soccer] which prohibits violent tackling or tackling on purpose. We must also be sure that the laws concerning violent football [soccer] tackling are consistent and reflects the individual offence.
If there is a violent tackle in which the person receives a fracture of his bones in any part of the body or is knocked unconscious, the penalty should be a lifetime unless there was evidence that such a tackle was not done on purpose. This punishment would serve as a deterrent to those who think that they could use any methods possible in order to win for their team. Another penalty that I propose would apply to the team. If a Football [Soccer] team condoned the conduct of the player who committed the violent tackle resulting in injury or death, the penalty should be demotion of ten to twenty points in the League or Association. If the case warrants it, an expulsion would suffice. England in its past had these problems with violent tackles and hooliganism and was punished with suspension from the European Games.
It is necessary to have these tough measures for dangerous football [soccer] tackles in order to set a precedence that unwarranted violence will no longer function in football [soccer]. The impunity with which a player could get away with a violent tackle also needs to be addressed regardless whether the player is a minor or major figure in the football [soccer] world. When will the Football [Soccer] Associations of the World introduce tougher penalties and enforce them? Will that day come when a death occurs during a game? Will that day occur when the player who was the victim of the violent dangerous football [soccer] tackle end up in a coma? I personally hope that it is not too late to impose stiffer penalties such as fines, suspensions, expulsions, and even bans of a provisional or a lifetime basis in a consistent manner.
Learn more about this author, Roberto Alvarez-Galloso.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Difference of opinion? Debate now.
- Soccer
- Soccer: Should the offside rule be scrapped?
- Are B squad international friendlies worthwhile?
- Will Scotland become a world contender in international soccer?
- Should the English Premiership take games overseas?
- Are soccer teams limiting their success by restricting manager appointments to ex players?
- Should the football transfer window system be scrapped?
