Home > Politics, News & Issues > US Politics > Political Issues
Title endorsed in part by:
Results so far:
| Yes | 78% | 56 votes | Total: 72 votes | |
| No | 22% | 16 votes |
Yes
Created on: April 14, 2008
Earmarks are generally regarded as specific funding requests by a member of congress to be directed to a home state or district project or organization. These requests are generally outside of specific government agency funding requests and the federal government agency whose appropriation bill the earmark is included in has no authorization or control over the expenditure. According to Taxpayers for Common Sense (www.taxpayer.net) the current FY08 appropriations contain just a hair over $18 billion dollars in earmarks totaling $14.8 billion in sponsored congressional requests, and another $3.5 billion dollars in earmarks that had no congressional sponsor identified.
Earmarks are seldom added to an appropriations bill while it is being constructed, but rather during the conference phase where the two houses of the congress get together to work out differences between the two house's respective legislation. And in this conference phase is where the real "you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours" of our current political environment comes into play. This is where the seniority of a congress member comes into play, since the more senior a member of congress is, the more likely he or she is going to get their little pet project funding into a piece of legislation, because their support is needed either to support another piece of legislation, or their weight and support for an earmark for a lesser senior member of congress is desired to ensure that earmark gets included.
Much has been made this election year on earmarking by congress, particularly by Senator McCain, who had zero earmarks associated with the FY 08 appropriations, according to TCS, while Senator Clinton had $342.4 million, and Senator Obama had $98.6. Many projects or organizations funded through earmarks are truly worthwhile causes and do bring jobs, funding, and needed projects to the individual state or precinct. The problem with earmarks is that Citizens against Government Waste estimates that 98 percent of earmarks are added during the conference phase, and are not voted on by the full membership of either house as a stand alone appropriation. This behind the scenes back scratching between members of congress puts the rest of the members of congress in the situation of having to vote for critical federal funding legislation as a whole containing the earmarks. If a member decides to vote against a funding bill due to particular earmarks, they risk suffering the backlash from fellow house members, senators, and constituents for holding up needed government appropriations.
Each of the individual earmarks in and of themselves may not seem like a lot of money, but a couple million here and a couple hundred thousand there, multiplied by a little over eleven thousand individual items, and you start talking about real money. The need to remove the ability to insert earmarks into needed pieces of legislation is becoming more and more imperative, at a time when we are running such large deficits, and funding two external wars. If a particular project or organization's funding is important enough to take a portion of everyone's tax dollars, then it is important enough to stand alone as an appropriation line item and be subjected to full congress scrutiny as the spending bills are constructed. The time to eliminate earmarks from the federal budget process has come.
Learn more about this author, Patrick Beatty.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
No
Created on: March 13, 2009
America's economy, which in part provides the great power of our country as well as the food and shelter for her citizens, has irrefutably collapsed and teeters on the edge of potential annihilation. With unemployment rising above 8%, widespread fear, originating from the collapse of the Banking structure, has plagued and battered the Dow Jones as stocks have fallen off the table. For many, the prospect of losing their 401ks and their financial livelihood has become an ominous possibility. Emanating from Wall Street, horror diffused across the country to Main Street, where it has been unbearable for many.
A vicious cycle of increased unemployment arising from decreased revenue for businesses, resulting in more unemployment demonstrates this simple fact: America desperately needs jobs. Obviously, the private sector is unable to provide them, therefore, it is the duty of our government to create them. An excellent way of providing this needed boost is via earmarks.
These projects, along with the mending of the Banking system and other aid, will create jobs and pave the way out of our current dilemma while accelerating scientific and cultural innovation. There are innumerable reasons why most earmarks will thaw the seemingly permafrost cash flows whose current immobility has partially crippled America's economy. Many different types of job positions will spring up like mushrooms after a rain: construction workers for highways or even cultural centers, for example, to youth activity organizers, housing their activities in the recently built community center provided by an earmark, are all within the realm of possibility with the immense variety of accepted projects. Another noteworthy beneficial product of "pork" is the increased demand of supplies and manufactured products that will save many businesses in peril. Ignorance by opponents of earmarks are blinded by their flawed ideology making them impervious to the extent of how necessary these projects are.
Many Republicans in particular will argue that the thought of blatant government expansion, specifically the unjustifiable breech of the government's ideal minimalist role, are both ideologically wrong and deleterious to our state. It seems as though they would rather adhere to their impractical, misinformed dogma under the false banner of honor and duty, than try to help their constituents. All the while wooing them with the faade of a valiant stand against the overwhelming multitudes of the "Big Brother" Democrats as they slither from Washington D.C. into your living room: A defenseless Alabama homemaker shivers as they cast a shadow over her shoulder, waiting for the noble Republicans to put their guards down so that they can hide a crippling, exponential tax hike in their proposed, legislative bane of all that is holy and worth living for: a National Abortion Legalization bill. Republicans seem more concerned about image and elections than their duty. Perhaps if they care so much about the unmoral waste of their beloved tax payers' money, they not try to sabotage the worthy spending of it, but instead refuse their salary. The Republicans' strategy is clearly not effective: ignoring an elephant in the room will not make it disappear; or if a couple is running late to their flight, it is not wise to argue for an extended period about which one of the two should drive.
Any action will be more effective than the Republicans current "exertion", even if the enacted solution isn't ideal. The Romans knew this and the fact that in dire situations any action is better than none. That was why they had tyrants with absolute, temporary rule until they were able to end a crisis. Throwing money at the problem certainly won't save our economy and is increasingly risky due to our tremendous national debt. Some fear this will doom future generations. However, with well planned, strategic projects, our situation will inevitably improve. While we all can agree on so the potential for corrupt waste of out tax money, many people are uninformed when it comes to the importance of earmarks, which are in fact valuable and essential to the betterment of our great Nation. They will be one potent component in Congress' recession remedy of wise spending with reform of our Nation's economy will make it emerge from this crisis stronger than ever.
Learn more about this author, T.L. McDouly.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.