Join | Log in

Show All Channels Show All Channels
Debate_icon

Politics, News & Issues   >

Terrorism

Is the Pakistani government helping or hindering the fight against terrorism?

Results so far:

Helping
28% 49 votes Total: 173 votes
Hindering
72% 124 votes
Helping

The Pakistani Government like any other is an avowed opponent of civil unrest and social instability and accordingly has taken a declared position against terrorism. That being said, there are mitigating factors within Pakistan which compound the problems of international terrorism over which the government either has very little control or over which she is not taking an active enough role. This begs the question, "Is the Pakistani government doing enough to fight terrorism?".

Since the events of 9/11 there have been a steady increase in terrorist attacks in Pakistan growing dramatically over the last few years. In 2006, an estimated 907 people were killed and 1,543 people were injured in terrorist bombings. According to a Pakistan Institute for Peace Studies (PIPS) security report 3,448 casualties from 1,503 attacks and clashes occurred in 2007. Thus far this year to March 4, 2008, well over 250 people have been killed in attacks and many more injured.

When reviewing some basic statistics one is tempted to suggest that the Pakistani government is not doing enough overall to improve the lives of its large population of almost 165 million people, 97 percent of them Islamic. Almost one quarter of the total land area is arable. This represents almost 195,000 square kilometers. This agricultural potential and the extensive natural gas reserves and natural resources including coal, copper and limestone could contribute to the establishment of a much wealthier nation if the people were only better served. Currently, a majority of the population does not have access to potable water. The per capita gross domestic product is a relatively poor $2,600. To complicate matters, Pakistan has become a haven of sorts for Afghani refugees, harboring an estimated 1,084,208 displaced persons running from the Taliban and Al-Qaeda and from the war in their front yards.

Naturally it is ludicrous to assume that the government of Pakistan is hindering the fight against terrorism much less facilitating the terrorist cause but it is not untoward to suggest that the government is simply too incompetent to wage an effective war against terrorism. By way of example, an effort to crack down on Islamic extremism and religious schools led to a July 19, 2005 raid on an all girls maddrassa which turned into a hopeless fiasco with the commandos being driven out by hysterical girls using whatever objects they could lay their hands on when they were caught without their veils. Police tear gas drove them outside where their batons ultimately sent 62 students into hospital with injuries.

A superficial assessment based on official government reports seems to indicate that clandestine planning operations leading to 9/11 were simply not on Pakistan's radar but this is without a doubt not the case. The head of Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence agency (ISI) at that time was Lieutenant General Hamid Gul. A self-declared Islamist who has been quoted as saying "God will destroy America", he has been linked to the attacks on 9/11. UPI reported on a document given to the 9/11 Commission which states that "ISI was fully involved in devising and helping the entire [9/11 plot]." It states that Gul is a self-avowed "admirer" of Osama Bin Ladin. Intercepts of communications pertaining to international money fund transfers to the principal conspirators in the 9/11 attacks for funding their flight training and living expenses reveal that some of those payments were authorized by Hamid Gul himself. International pressure on the Pakistani government led to the general being discharged and being placed under house arrest in his home town, where he remains to this day. By anyone's standards this is simply not doing enough.

Some believe that to some extent America may be hindering the cause. The New York Times reports that senator and democratic party candidate Barak Obama has stated that, "the Bush administration's Iraq policy has made America more vulnerable to attack, and has weakened the country's position in pressing the president of Pakistan, Gen. Pervez Musharraf, to close down terrorist training camps."

Pakistan has recently scaled up its drive against Taliban and Al-Qaeda militants in the eastern end of the Khyber Pass. Peshawar is virtually under siege as insurgents, driven from tribal homelands by persistent American and coalition forces, have taken the fight into the city. Pakistan has come to accept that there is indeed a war going on. A March 4 announcement by Pakistan Interior Ministry Spokesman Javed Iqbal Cheema has reaffirmed the Pakistani Government's determination to fight terrorism, stating that the 11 men freed from custody in Guantanamo Bay will be interrogated thoroughly before they are allowed to return home.

Judging from the damage inflicted by terrorist activities inside her borders especially over the last few years, it is illogical to think that the government of Pakistan would hinder the effort to fight the insurgency. Terrorists are seeking to destabilize the transition of government after the recent elections and the government is determined to see that the process occurs smoothly and without incident. To shrug the insurgency off or hinder efforts by government forces to do battle with terrorists would not only be counter-productive but would place the credibility of Pakistan's government under even more serious scrutiny. Pakistan certainly does not want foreign intervention in its internal affairs. Even the threat of sanctions or of the removal of foreign aid is not acceptable considering her current economic situation. As to whether things will get worse before they get any better remains to be seen but insomuch as the end will justify the means the situation simply cannot be allowed to continue under any circumstances. This much the Pakistan government knows.

Learn more about this author, Steve Lussing.
Contact this writer Click here to send Author comments or questions.

Hindering

With Afghanistan, and Iran to its east, and an indigenous nuclear weapons program, Pakistan's cooperation with the United States will be a determining factor in the success, or failure of the Global War on Terror. Post 9/11, Pakistan emerged as a leading ally of the United States. Its longstanding ties with the Taliban were publicly severed, its cooperation with U.S. intelligence agencies led to the dismantling of AQ Khan's nuclear proliferation network, and the Pakistani military boasts of an estimated 500-700 Taliban and al-Qa'ida fighters captured, or killed. Pakistan's cooperation with the United States, however, has been superficial. Despite Pakistan's public denouncement of Islamic extremism, the connection between Pakistan's security services and Islamic fundamentalists remain strong, and U.S. aid to Pakistan, which has exceeded $10 billion, has trickled down to the terrorist networks operating out of Pakistan, and strengthened their ability to wage war on those who oppose them.

On Sept. 13 2001, Richard Armitage, then Deputy Secretary of State, met with Pakistani ambassador Maleeha Lodhi, and Pakistani intelligence chief Mahmood Ahmed to explain the United State's new national security policy: there is no distinction between terrorists and the nations that protect them. In this meeting, Ahmed later reported Armitage threatened to bomb Pakistan, "back into the stone ages". It was, also, at this meeting where the demands for Pakistani cooperation with the United States were given. Under the threat of being identified as a nation that served as a haven for terrorists, Pakistan agreed to grant the U.S. overflight and landing rights, territorial access, to cut off fuel shipments to the Taliban, and to apprehend al-Qa'ida operatives at the border. It is questionable, however, whether this form of diplomacy was successful in securing a sincere commitment from Pakistan to break over 3 decades of cooperation and support to Islamic extremists, and fight the war on terror.

It was Pakistan's Inter-Service Intelligence (ISI) unit that the United States used as a cut out to train, equip, and supply the Mujahedin in Afghanistan to fight the Soviet occupation. It was Osama Bin Laden who became the ISI's warrior of choice. Likewise, in the Global War on Terror, there is no guarantee that the warriors trained, equipped, and supplied by Pakistan with U.S. aid are loyal to U.S. interests. As Nic Robertson from CNN has reported, the sympathies of the citizens of Pakistan are with al-Qa'ida, not with the west, and senior al-Qa'ida operatives move freely throughout Pakistan, despite the active operations of military and security services against them. Since the influx of U.S. aid, India has reported that Pakistan has increased it's support of militant fundamentalist groups agitating for a sovereign Islamic state in India's northeast; groups that are allied with the Taliban and al-Qa'ida. Pakistan's security agreement with tribal leaders on the border of Afghanistan, which gave tribal leaders control of the border, has resulted in an upsurge of cross-border attacks against U.S. troops in Afghanistan. While Pakistan reaps a financial reward for publicly proclaiming it is an ally of the U.S. in the Global War on Terror, the affiliations of the Pakistani security apparatus, and the popular sentiments of Pakistani citizens suggest otherwise.

Learn more about this author, Abigail Adams.
Contact this writer Click here to send Author comments or questions.

What is Helium? | User Guide | Community | Link to Helium | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA