<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Helium.com | New Debate articles at Helium for Should employers provide employee benefits for same-sex partners of employees?</title>
    <link>http://www.helium.com/debates/138594-should-employers-provide-employee-benefits-for-same-sex-partners-of-employees.xml</link>
    <description>New Debate articles at Helium for Should employers provide employee benefits for same-sex partners of employees?</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright Helium.com</copyright>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 19:39:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 19:39:55 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <category>No</category>
      <title> Assuming that the business is located in a state where the same sex union is not recognized, the question now becomes a moral and financial questi...</title>
      <link>http://www.helium.com/items/1654382-employee-benefits-for-same-sex-couples</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:44:58</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <category>Yes</category>
      <title>Like so many debates on Helium, it is hard to have a clear cut answer as to why you chose the side you did. In this case, the benefits would depend...</title>
      <link>http://www.helium.com/items/1658981-should-employers-provide-employee-benefits-for-same-sex-partners-of-employees</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 07:34:36</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
