Search Helium

Home > Business > Human Resources

Does workforce diversity live up to its promise?

Results so far:

No
63% 219 votes Total: 345 votes
Yes
37% 126 votes

No

by Victor Mikulin

Created on: June 11, 2009   Last Updated: June 15, 2009

The philosophy and concept in workplace diversity is similar to socialism in that it is a beautiful and just thing in theory, but the reality is that it just doesn't work in the real and practical world. To assume that people of every race, gender, age, and background are capable of the same accomplishments given equal requirements, mandates, constraints and resources is well intended but naive. If one accepts the tenants of natural selection, each individual will bring to any task a mosaic of knowledge, skills, abilities, and pertinent background. Their relative success or failure at that task will be predicated upon those factors, and not their inclusion into one of several sociological or demographic categories.

To attempt to codify employment requirements based upon factors other than those that are specific to the nature and scope of the position is a waste of time, money, and effort. It is by its very nature an arbitrary and prejudicial criterion that should not be considered. The sum total qualifications and background of the individual should be the paramount consideration, irrespective of race, gender, age, ethnicity, or cultural background.

Federal laws that require workplace diversity are part and parcel a derivative of affirmative action. While prejudicial hiring practices are deplorable, attempting to compensate for historical practices that discriminated against racial minorities, women, and either the young or the more mature are well intended but futile. Attempts to legislate morality have never been successful. Despite the fact the federal law mandates workplace diversity, if an individual who is in charge of hiring employees holds a distinct bias; they will find ways to circumvent both the letter and the intent of the law. Conversely, hiring an applicant based upon their inclusion as a member of a demographic group as opposed to their qualifications not only sets them up for failure (potentially reinforcing a negative stereotype), but directly supports de jure and enacts defacto discrimination against people who are outside of the targeted demographic group.

This is not to say that occupations cannot have non-traditional members among their ranks. I personally know a female master diesel mechanic who has to fight misconceptions about her daily. Due to the fact that she is a tall, somewhat willowy, attractive female, customers (especially male customers) assume that she is "window dressing" and could not possibly be a qualified mechanic. I have delighted in watching their reaction to her quoting them "chapter and verse" about their mechanical problems, and am particularly gratified to hear their effuse praises over here knowledge, skills, and abilities after they test drive the vehicle that she has personally diagnosed and repaired.

In that same vein of reflection, having spent over 25 years in the medical field, some of the finest, most compassionate and caring nurses I have known were men. Patients usually assume that those men were physicians and not nurses, based upon historic stereotypes. The assumption being that men lack the capacity for nurturing, and are most comfortable in a more detached clinical role.

Equal opportunity is and should be the law of the land. An individual being qualified for any position has nothing to do with their inclusion in a specific demographic group. Affirmative action has not worked and will not work simply because you can change the laws of the land, but you can't force someone to change what is in their heart or in their mind.

Learn more about this author, Victor Mikulin.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.

Yes

by Gary Maclean

Created on: April 03, 2008   Last Updated: May 30, 2011

What does a diversified group of employees do for a corporation? What does a company gain from having a racially, ethnically mixed staff of employees? Outside of forced quotas or equal rights of any kind, what is there that might persuade any company to blend their employee make up? If a corporation has a group of employees from different ethnic, racial, cultural, perhaps even spiritual, backgrounds, are there any benefits to be enjoyed?

I don't know what the promise of workforce diversity is supposed to be, but I have to imagine it has something to do with dollars. Few other benefits would convince an organization to freely participate in any program, let alone one that is so potentially crippling as forced diversification. A study conducted by Covenant Investment Management on the performance of the S&P 500 showed that organizations that excel at building a diverse workforce will experience better financial performance in the long run than organizations which are not effective in managing diversity. In other words, if you build a diverse workforce you are going to make more money. That is one heck of a promise, now, can diversity deliver?

That same study found, the annualized return for the 100 companies which rated lowest in workforce diversity, averaged 7.9 percent. This is compared to 18.3 percent for the 100 companies that rated the highest. The stock market performance of the firms that were high performers on workforce diversity was 2.5 times higher than that of the firms that invested little in diverse work forces.

Some additional benefits experienced by those organizations developing diverse workforces include;

IMPROVED GLOBAL MANAGEMENT CAPACITY: About 30% of the 200 companies surveyed indicated they have a more successful program of placing management employees across the globe. They feel this is due to having built their workforce to include diverse backgrounds that may already be familiar with the global surroundings of their specific location.

AVOIDED COURT COSTS: Another 30% of the S&P 200 indicated that by having the right employee available, who was familiar with specific customs and cultures, they were able to avoid what could otherwise have been very time consuming and expensive litigation.

IMPROVED ACCESS TO NEW MARKETS: The more diverse your management group is, the more markets your organization has knowledge of. 40% of the S&P 200 study indicated this was indeed a benefit and it has paid off for them.

LOWERED ABSENTEEISM RATES: This was reported as a realized benefit that progressively gets better as their workforce is diversified more and more. 40% of the S&P 200 agreed.

REDUCED LABOR TURNOVER: Over 50% of the S&P studied organizations, cited a reduced turnover as one of the primary benefits of developing a diversified workforce.

HELPED TO OVERCOME LABOR SHORTAGES: By opening up the employment ranks to all cultures and backgrounds it was possible to expand the hiring perimeter. More potential employees became available therefore more employees were able to be reviewed for certain positions. This was reported as a benefit by over 60% of all respondents.

ENHANCED CUSTOMER SATISFACTION: Speaking from my own personal experience, I prefer to speak with someone of similar national backgrounds when I contact an OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer). We can understand each other better for one thing. The more diversified your workforce the better able your company will be to directly communicate with all customers across the globe. Again, a 60% positive response for this benefit.

IMPROVED INNOVATION AND CREATIVITY AMONGST EMPLOYEES: (60%) With the expanded backgrounds and experiences of a diversified work group an organization is bound to gain new ideas and directions. Everyone, thinking differently, providing more ideas, suggesting better directions; a very healthy environment indeed.

IMPROVED MOTIVATION AND EFFICIENCY OF EXISTING STAFF: (60%) With the influx of new talent, existing employees will be shaken from their potential perches of comfort and stability. They will be invigorated and driven to new heights.

HELPED TO ATTRACT AND RETAIN HIGHLY TALENTED PEOPLE: (65%) Other multi-cultural individuals, on the outside looking in, will be significantly more enthused about coming to an organization for potential employment where that organization already employs a veritable wealth of talent from all segments of the population.

ENHANCED CORPORATE REPUTATION: (70%) By opening the candidate requirements to all potential employees rather than a select group, the organization will have such a stronger pool to choose from. The stronger their own workforce the better their output. The better their output the more attractive their reputation.

STRENGTHENED CULTURAL VALUES WITHIN THE ORGANIZATION: (75%) Working next to and with people of any and all cultures, day in and day out, will serve to promote what America started out to be in the first place; a giant melting pot. Employees will share beliefs, standards, ideas, backgrounds, customs, everything about themselves with one another. All employees will ultimately improve their own personal understanding and acknowledgment of different cultures and backgrounds. With understanding comes strength.

These being the recognized benefits shared by a large percentage of the 200 Standard & Poor organization surveyed, indicates to me they should also make up the promise of diversified work groups. Based on those descriptions I would have to say that workforce diversity does indeed live up to its promise.

Learn more about this author, Gary Maclean.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.


CONNECT WITH US

Read
our blog
Helum for writers

Write and get published
Share with other writers
Polish your freelancing skills

Join our active writing community
Helium Content Source for Publishers

Quality articles from proven freelancers
Exclusive rights, fast turnaround
Brand engagement, business blogging -- our writers do it all

Get custom content today!

INFORMATION


Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA