Home > Entertainment > Television > TV Show Reviews
Results so far:
| Yes | 31% | 75 votes | Total: 243 votes | |
| No | 69% | 168 votes |
Yes
Created on: November 17, 2008
When "Celebrity Rehab with Dr. Drew" first premiered, I had doubts. I thought this was simply another exploitative reality TV shows, designed to take someone's suffering and turn it into entertainment for the masses. But when I happened stumble upon an episode, I found myself riveted by the genuine emotions and struggle that was happening in the rehabilitation facility.
Suddenly this wasn't about exploiting human suffering, but about acknowledging it and empowering those who were suffering. It was about educating the general population to the complexities of addiction, and how to deal with such a crippling disease. There was a sensitivity in how the daily struggles of the celebrity addicts was presented and a raw openness with how issues were raised and addressed. The show was very similar to A&E's critically acclaimed docu-series, Intervention.
As Dr. Drew had once remarked, "we are only as sick as our secrets," so this show has demonstrated with celebrity addicts. Yes, at times the camera can feel intrusive and it's uncomfortable watching someone confess to traumatic childhood abuse. But at the same time, there was an understanding and respect that can develop between viewers and the celebrity addict.
Take for instance, Brigitte Nielsen, once famous for being a bombshell and the ex-wife of Sylvester Stallone, and pro football star, Mark Gastineau.. Her image in the press was that of a manipulative gold digger. But on celebrity rehab, we got to meet a sensitive, repentant woman, who was torn up about how her addiction was affecting her children. We got to see how she struggled with her addictions while living the so-called high life. She was a real person, with flaws and vulnerbilities, like the rest of us. In the end, when she managed to attain and keep her sobriety, it was a joyful moment for everyone.
In the rehab center, the celebrities were accepted as they are - addicts who needed help. There was no pecking order, no A-lists, no image to uphold. In fact, Dr. Drew regularly got them to "get real" and tell him (and the others) about who they really were, behind their so-called public images. Not surprisingly, many of the celebrities had trouble with this, often finding comfort in the image they had created for themselves as it served as a buffer between the world and their real, suffering, vulnerable selves. In a way then, it could be argued that by having these celebrities really be themselves in front of the camera for the first time was an important first step in their recovery since more often than not, it was the fake image that often contributed to their addiction.
Of course there were moments where some celebrities were clearly playing to the camera. Jeff Conway (now back again for another stint on the second season of the show) comes to mind, along with his enabling, co-dependent girlfriend Vicki. Jeff didn't seem to have a real desire to get clean, and his progress (or lack thereof) reflected that. While it could be argued that Jeff couldn't play to the cameras if they weren't there, it could also be noted that one of the primary lesson learned in rehab is that one must have a real desire to get better.
I doubt that if Jeff Conway had been at some other rehab centers (and he had stated that he has tried rehab before, without cameras) his prognosis would have been different. It was clear that he didn't really have the desire kick his addiction completely, and the fact that his girlfriend seemed to be sabotaging him didn't help. So the cameras could hardly be blamed for that. Likewise, I dont' doubt that Brigitte Nielsen would have gotten clean and sober at some other rehab center because she clearly had the desire to combat her addiction. It's no coincidence that she's still clean and sober now, and no cameras have been following her around since the first seaosn wrapped up.
In the end, addiction is a complicated disease and battling it isn't as simple as "best done in private" or "let the public watch." As any addict will tell you, the desire to use is constant and anything, absolutely anything, can make an addict want to use. So the mere presence or absence of cameras in an addict's recovery is oversimplifying a complex and protracted process.
Learn more about this author, Katie Lee.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
No
Created on: January 24, 2009
Celebrity rehabs may be great for detox, but not so effective when it comes to long term success. The five star spas used as drug rehabilitation for Hollywood A listers are a great place for young stars to relax, unwind and clean out their emaciated bodies for a while. The problem is that the whole experience is no more effective than a b12 shot for a workaholic. All it does is energize the celeb for long enough for them to burst right back in to the party scene. I personally think a better question would be; Why isn't every celebrity an addict? I couldn't imagine trying to live a straight and healthy life in the midst of drugs, glitter and Paris Hilton. I might need a little push just to get me through dinner.
I understand the plight of the paparazzi to a certain degree but I do wish they could take a step behind the ethical line sometimes. Sure drug addiction is a great story but it's also a pretty serious and devastating thing no matter how much money you have. I do believe that living in the public eye makes it harder for stars to be successful in their road to recovery. However, I also believe that the majority of these celebrities are a little less than dedicated to their treatment. If a star goes back to their party lifestyle after graduating from their twelve step program the flashing cameras are probably not to blame. If anything, seeing yourself drunk and half naked with your mascara running down to you belly button on TMZ may actually help these people recognize themselves as an addict sooner than the average person. I know I would think twice about the third Appletini if I saw my girly parts plastered all over the newsstand and gossip blogs everywhere.
Do the paparazzi go to far? Yes, it's their jobs to do so no matter how morally and ethically questionable it may be. The bottom line is that a celebrity addict, is just an addict. They need to be determined and focus on their treatment and if they are, then the cameras won't stop them. It's hard to think of the rich and famous as being just like you and I and there's a reason for this. They are not like you and I. They are different, very different. So when we think about what it must be like to be them we are waisting our time. I am not going to sit here and wonder how I would feel if my trip to rehab was televised because I am not Lindsay Lohan. I have not had every second of my life and career documented and played on E!. These people live in another world and we can't possibly identify.
Learn more about this author, Angie Barron.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.