Home > Politics, News & Issues > US Law & Justice > Drug Laws & Prevention
Should a Constitutional amendment have been required to prohibit today's illicit drugs?
Title endorsed in part by:
Results so far:
| No | 61% | 48 votes | Total: 79 votes | |
| Yes | 39% | 31 votes |
No
-
by Charles Ray
Created on: December 20, 2009 Last Updated: December 21, 2009
The U.S. Constitution was crafted to set the basic foundation of the laws underpinning the new republic. It
-
Created on: February 18, 2009
The Constitution of the United States of America isn't about creating laws and limiting the rights of
-
by Duane Kuehn
Created on: January 20, 2010 Last Updated: January 22, 2010
Any Constitutional Amendment of prohibition should not used to solve any problem, including the problem
-
Created on: May 01, 2008
A Constitutional amendment banning illicit drugs? Talking about killing a caterpillar with a cannon
Yes
-
by Scott Turner
Created on: January 06, 2012
There is a reason the 2nd ammendment exists. Guns are the most controversial things someone can own.
-
Created on: April 27, 2008
Yes, a Constitutional amendment have been required to prohibit today's illicit drugs.
BUT
We also need
Join the Debate now.
Write your point of view.
Write and get published
Share with other writers
Polish your freelancing skills
Quality articles from proven freelancers
Exclusive rights, fast turnaround
Brand engagement, business blogging -- our writers do it all
INFORMATION
Copyright © 2002-2012 Helium, Inc. All rights reserved.
Helium.com: A Service of RR Donnelley