Home > Politics, News & Issues > US Politics > Homeland Security
Results so far:
| executed | 39% | 84 votes | Total: 213 votes | |
| life | 61% | 129 votes |
executed
Created on: February 06, 2008
I can think of no crime more heinous than treason, and because it is so terrible and potentially disastrous to a nation; I firmly believe that anyone convicted of treason should be executed. Few criminals throughout history have been more despised than traitors. Treason is such a vile crime, that in the US today, those individuals convicted of treason cannot be placed in general population in a prison. Traitors are considered the lowest of the low in the prison population and are in frequent jeopardy from other inmates.
Quite probably the most famous traitor in history was Judas Iscariot, who betrayed Christ to the Jewish authorities for 30 pieces of silver. Why, because Judas was looking for an earthly leader, who would remake Israel into a Jewish State, raising his closest followers to positions of great status and wealth. Realizing this was not, and never had been, Christ's goal, Judas committed the ultimate crime for immediate monetary gain. Later, realizing what he had done, Judas tried to undo his betrayal by attempting to return the money. Being refused, he threw the money at Jewish leaders, and committed suicide by hanging.
During the American Revolution, Benedict Arnold had played a leading role in the Continental Army. He had been one of the co-leaders with Ethan Allen in the attack on Ticonderoga, capturing not only the fort, it's British garrison, but large quantities of powder, shot, muskets and cannon. All greatly needed by the fledgling Continental Army. He had been one of the leaders of the Continental Army in the invasion of Canada and had been severely wounded at Montreal. As second in command at the Battle of Saratoga, Arnold had been instrumental in turning a possible defeat into a stunning victory, which eventually led France to recognize the colonies as a new nation. This brought French resources into the war on the side of the rebels and with the assistance of the French Fleet led to American victory and independence. Yet, because he had failed to receive the recognition he felt he deserved and was denied, Arnold was willing to betray his country by selling the plans to West Point and switching allegiance to the British Crown. Arnold eventually fought against his former friends and companions as a British General, achieving little success. Yet the possible damage he could have caused the Continental Army by his betrayal is almost impossible to calculate. Because he was never captured, Arnold escaped punishment and later died despised, outcast, and almost penniless.
More modern traitors like Johnny Walker, his brother Arthur, his best friend, and his son made a cottage industry of treason. Beginning in the late 60s Walker used his position in the Navy to sell large amounts of Secret data to the Soviet Union during the height of the Viet Nam Conflict and for years afterward. Not content just to sell information he had access to, Walker brought the other members into his conspiracy. And was able to avoid detection for many years by falsifying information and reports necessary for his continued Security Clearances. He was finally caught when his ex-wife went to the FBI out of concern for their son. In a prison interview, Walker attempted to downplay the information his group had sold to the Soviet Union, by saying it had not directly caused the loss of life of one American soldier in Viet Nam. His deep denial allowed him to gloss over the knowledge that the Soviets undoubtedly shared information obtained from him with the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong. The full extent of the damage to the US and loss of life of American servicemen, caused by Walker and his co-conspirators will probably never be known.
The damage caused to the safety and security of the United States by the Walkers, Pelham, and numerous others who have been caught and convicted of treason since the late 60s is beyond measurement. In many cases, after capture and conviction, these individuals and others have bragged about their betrayal of a nation, how easy it had been for them to accomplish their deceptions, and the financial rewards received for their actions. Almost, always glossing over the actual damage done to the nation. Possibly in an effort to keep from facing the actual ramifications of their actions, and cowardly personal responsibility.
These individuals, men and women alike, deserve no less than the maximum penalty allowed by law which is the death sentence. Their actions place them among the most reprehensible in society, right alongside serial murderers. None of them should be allowed to plea bargain their way into a life sentence in a maximum security prison at taxpayer expense. While it is never easy to know the full extent of the information they've sold, you can have reasonable knowledge of everything they had access to. And in these situations, a nation must err on the side of caution, and assume they've sold everything they had access to. Once an individual has been convicted of treason, he or she should be executed as soon as possible. The costs of their actions to our country literally costs millions of dollars and often years of effort to undo. No one deserves to be executed as much as a traitor.
Learn more about this author, Arthur Gibson.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
life
Created on: January 26, 2008
Treason, whether military or civilian related is a very serious charge. It is a term that has a tremendous amount of mystique surrounding it, conjuring up cold war error defections and high profile military cases that made world press. In today's society though, treason can take on a very different meaning.
Given the violent and tumultuous times we live in, certain elements of the government are quick to capitalize on the fears so prevalent in this new age of terrorism. Unspeakable things have already been done in the name of national security. Arrests have been made, suspects tortured and rights trampled all in the name of fighting terrorism, when in fact it is often a means to advance one's own agenda. People such as this would hardly hesitate to accuse someone of treason if that also suited their purposes.
In an environment in which political posturing can very easily result in an innocent person being black listed as a terrorist sympathizer, it is very dangerous to have such harsh and ultimate punishments as execution attached to any crime. When our civil liberties are threatened by elements of the government on a daily basis, who can you turn to for appeal when a dishonest or disreputable individual lodges an unfounded complaint against you in order to protect themselves and their self interest?
Witch hunts like those that the Bush administration seems to be engaged in have occurred more times than logic should have allowed throughout our brief history. Each time they have propagated a society of fear and paranoia perched constantly on the edge of radical and questionable actions. Such rhetoric and ill intention makes for a dangerous society for those who value free speech and expression of their ideas. Speak ill of the reigning party in power and you can quickly become the ire of their disdain and attract unwanted attention. In such a situation it is easy to contemplate the charge of treason being bantered around with little or no evidence, and enforced by the full power of the administration in power.
Treason, whether genuine or concocted can take on many different forms. Is anything that is deemed treason to be punished by death? What if that treason is simply speaking out against the injustices of a corrupt and self serving administration? Aside from some ruffled feathers and disgruntled citizen little harm generally comes of this type of treason. Perhaps some opened minds and a heated election fueled by a much more aware public is the ultimate outcome of such treason. Surely this is not justification for sentencing someone to death, regardless of how politically expedient it might be for the individuals in power.
What then justifies the taking of another life? As a supported of the death penalty I have my own very clear definition of what would justify this ultimate form of punishment. Treason is not among that short list of justifications. At least not any form of treason that I can conceive of. When I look back at the high profile cases of treason in recent history, Iva Toguri D'Aquino (Tokyo Rose), Mildred Gillars (Axis Sally), Hans Haupt, these all occurred during times of war, none resulting in the direct deaths of others and all sentenced to terms in prison. These certainly seem like reasonable penance for the crimes they've committed.
All of these convicted individuals had the opportunity to have their circumstances reviewed again in the future under different administrations. Thus allowing them the chance of an impartial hearing of their cases without the prejudice associated with the original accuser. While this type of practice could still potentially result in an innocent person being imprisoned for a lengthy period of time, they at least have a chance to redeem themselves at some point in the future. The penalty of death robs the convicted individual of such a right, and thus can potentially put an innocent person to death in the interested of a self serving individual.
Learn more about this author, Joseph Whalen.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.