Search Helium

Home > Business > Business Issues

Tax rebates as economic stimulus: Will it work?

Results so far:

No
54% 202 votes Total: 377 votes
Yes
46% 175 votes

No

by V. Kumar

Created on: June 08, 2008   Last Updated: July 28, 2008

Tax rebates are a very effective tool, a tool that CAN WORK, PROVIDED they are used to induce the changes that are desired, and not just to augment the spending power of the masses.

EFFECTS OF TAX REBATE

Tax rebate has two important effects - First, it increases spending power of taxpayer; second, it changes economic behavior of taxpayer.

While the first effect is always there. The second effect will depend upon the design of the tax rebate - a conditional tax rebate associated with a particular economic choice will modify behaviour of people towards that choice. It is the second effect that can make tax rebates work, not the first one.

PAST EXPERIENCE & KEYNESIAN THEORY

Some may like to counter me with a reference to history. After all, the whole Keynesian economics is based on the success of killing the great depression by augmenting spending power of the people. Unfortunately, what worked in great depression cannot work in each and every situation.

Even the tax cuts during the eighties and nineties can be quoted as examples of how tax rebates always lead to economic boom. It is true that tax cuts in many countries during the last couple of decades have given a positive dividend, but then, before attributing it to tax cuts, one need to analyse how those tax cuts were introduced. All those cuts were actually more in the form of rationalization of tax rates, or more specifically the maximum marginal rates, which did not affect the whole of the economy. Most of these cuts actually reduced the maximum marginal rates while raising the tax collections. In other words those tax rationalizations lead to higher tax collection, leaving lesser money for spending. Yet they were successful because they reduced the inefficiency of the economy and lessened incentive for evasion.

LAFFER CURVE

There is a concept in economics called 'Laffer curve'. The underlying principle of this concept is that when the tax rates are too high, then reducing the rates actually increases collections, but once the tax rates are reasonable, then any further reduction will reduce the tax collections.

Tax cuts work only till the point they do not lead to reduction in tax collections. That, unfortunately is not the case today.

If the revenue at the disposal of government falls, it can have severe impact, on social infrastructure, as well as in investments oriented towards future growth. After all, in United States, public saving has been an important component in capital formation and a fall in it will definitely stall future growth.

CONCLUSION

If tax rebates are used to accelerate spending in areas that have a crucial bearing on future economic scenario, they can prove extremely effective. The areas which deserve these tax breaks include energy efficiency, alternative fuels, solar energy, local manufacturing, innovation and social infrastructure especially higher education in basic sciences.

Learn more about this author, V. Kumar.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.

Yes

by Will Emprise

Created on: February 18, 2008

Tax rebates have traditionally worked every time they have been issued, just to what extent, and how fast.

This is a complicated subject matter, and first, there is a need to understand what tax rebates are trying to correct, what goes on during a recession, and how a nation comes out of a recession.

First of all, over-production produces too much of momentarily unneeded things and no one willing to purchase them at the moment. Thus, too many tires, too many tables, too many cabinets may have been produced, consumers may not want them yet and thus these items sit dormant on shelves or in factories. Those that produced them or are in the business of continually producing such items are laid off because their employers have not enough demand to keep them employed. Once these workers are unemployed, they restrict their spending, which means they buy less televisions, cell phones, cars, and even homes. Of course, the cycle then continues the television workers, cell-phone producers, car factory workers, and real estate agents become more and more unemployed. Once this second wave of people becomes unemployed they also start to restrict their spending; they drive less, don't go to movies, don't go to restaurant. Soon waiters and waitresses can't survive on their tips and they become unemployed, the can't pay their car insurance, they can't afford their rent. They spend less on even more items and services, such as food, drinks, heating, and clothing. Thus even more restaurant employees, more bars, more clothing stores begin to lay people off. Obviously this is an endless cycle and during the great depression one in three of all workers experienced this down turn problem.

The remedy proposed by John Maynard Keynes was for the government to spend, not save. Traditionally, before 1930, the United States would espouse a restrictive spending policy in a downturn economy and would act the same way that an individual would: save money, don't spend, and wait until the end of the recession. This is of course what Keynes claimed was the wrong thing to do. In his book, John Maynard Keynes constructed a string of equations to model the US economy. These equations expressed that for an economy to com out of a recession swiftly its government should SPEND.

Once the government gives money to the people, or purchases things such as military equipment, bridges, roads, or even government buildings, money automatically works its way back to the people. Thus, the bridge builders, the road constructors, the military engineers, and the government building constructors, are called to work, and eventually they have more money. They begin spending their money freely, they go to bars and restaurants. The restaurant owners call back the laid off waitresses. Some of the construction workers may buy new cars, which takes those tires off the shelf. These workers may purchase new kitchen cabinets which brings the cabinet factory back into business and employees the formerly laid off workers. Now the cabinet workers go out and buy televisions, cell-phones, and cars, because they are making money again. The economy is in an upturn and people are spending freely, not restrictively until those laid-off are almost entirely brought back to work. Now these people with their jobs back look to the future, formulate that they can afford to start their own businesses and hire more people, thus the unemployment rate shrinks even more.
Now the advantage of the tax rebate is that the rebate can be issued BEFORE the downturn. When the government sees some key indicators showing that things are slowing down, the government can issue money to the people so that they can buy things from the shelves so that no one gets laid off and that if no one gets laid off, no one slows down their spending and a recession never occurs.

Tax rebates are brilliant and extremely efficient. Thank John Maynard Keynes for explaining this.

Learn more about this author, Will Emprise.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.


CONNECT WITH US

Read
our blog
Helum for writers

Write and get published
Share with other writers
Polish your freelancing skills

Join our active writing community
Helium Content Source for Publishers

Quality articles from proven freelancers
Exclusive rights, fast turnaround
Brand engagement, business blogging -- our writers do it all

Get custom content today!

INFORMATION


Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA