Results so far:
| No | 44% | 435 votes | Total: 981 votes | |
| Yes | 56% | 546 votes |
In order to answer this question with any real meaning I think that we should be aware of the inference within the heading, that graduates are the best people to teach in a homeschool situation.
Whilst studying this topic I find myself asking the following questions.
1) In which discipline was the degree obtained?
2) Was the degree followed by a teaching qualification?
3) Why was the degree sought in the first instance?
Firstly, just what is a degree? To which the answer is. A degree is the formal recognition of advanced achievement within a defined discipline, this could be in English, math or one of the sciences etc.
In order to undertake a scholarship at university certain criteria needs to be met in order to ascertain the basic abilities of the potential graduate. Although the guidance for determining this criteria is set at a national level, there may be regional variations or even variants set by the individual university for entry-level qualification. The point here is that although a particular subject is the ulterior aim a potential candidate needs to demonstrate by qualification a good workable knowledge and ability to apply the key skills, the essential foundation for advanced learning.
Having stated that of course, in these days of equality of opportunity there are ways in which candidates of lesser ability can gain assistance if they have the initial determination to undertake the advanced study.
The culmination of this first section is that a graduate comes through with the ability to communicate, to weigh things up (math) and of course a proven ability to practice within the chosen area of expertise.
With this knowledge in hand, let us revisit my list of questions at the head of this article.
1) In which discipline was the degree obtained?
Apart from the essential skills of communication (oral and written) and math, the graduate holds certified proof of competency within the disciplinary area. If the discipline is not in English (or whatever the language of nationality), or in math, the holder of the degree has three competencies of proven value. Of course if the degree is within communication or math, then there are two competencies implied, one of which, is the subject of the degree.
The question here is, what competencies does the graduate have to pass on to others? Whereas in a school situation there is a collection of persons with such proven qualities in many essential areas of expertise. A child in the school situation has a wider library from which to obtain qualified information in many subject areas.
In a home school situation, how is the graduate parent going to provide the essential, additional subject matter effectively for the purpose of providing a rounded educational experience for their child, an educational experience that satisfies the national criteria relevant to the curriculum.
2) Was the degree followed by a teaching qualification?
Teachi ng techniques are themselves a specialist area. The fact that someone has proven vocational abilities does not by any means signify an ability to impart information to another effectively. For this reason, if a graduate wishes to pass on their knowledge to others, they need an additional teaching qualification.
At this stage the graduate is now qualified not only within their preferred vocational area, but also to teach within that specialist area. But, do they now have the ability to teach in areas beyond their own specialist field? Of course the answer is no, all that has changed is the graduate is now qualified to teach within the area, to, (generally, though exceptions may apply) the level beneath their own qualification in any discipline. Assuming that a degree is a level four qualification, a graduate with the additional teaching certificate could teach up to a level three qualification.
It is of the utmost importance that someone in the position of teacher gets it right, otherwise a young scholar could so easily be left confused if the subject matter, and /or teaching methods were defective.
Be under no illusion, confusion in an early stage of development could well be the seed of failure, a seed that feeds on diversionary acts such as character (attitude) problems. Acts that divert the attention of others from ones own deficiencies.
3) Why was the degree sought in the first instance?
In the main, people go to university for a specific purpose, that is, to improve their earning power in order to have an opportunity to live a life for themselves and immediate family as close as possible to their idea of Utopia.
Assuming that I am right in the former paragraph, would it make any sense at all for the graduate to ditch those years preceding graduation to stay at home to teach their children, or would it be far better for the graduate to go out and earn that extra income, in order to send their child to a private school of their choosing.
Summary.
So, where does the non-graduate stand on this question? It is by far best to leave the subject of teaching to the learning establishment. To a collection of graduates who individually have the knowledge that is required to fulfil a specific unit of the curriculum, thereby as a team the whole curriculum can be covered efficiently and perhaps more important, effectively.
Where does the non-graduate stand in this picture? In short, in more ways than one, well outside of the school gates, alongside the graduate would-be homeschool teaching contender.
There is a whole lot more that children learn in a traditional school situation other than the basic curriculum, like citizenship for example. In a homeschool situation of course the child will meet with adversaries, but in this situation these obstacles can be avoided simply by inserting space between the self and the problematic party, all that is achieved here is the hide away solution to life's problems. Whereas, in the schoolyard these problems are in your face' and need corrective action. This instils a sense of reason to a problematic situation, a good foothold to becoming a responsible and considerate citizen throughout life.
If the choice to homeschool is because of problems within the school environment, then this should be resolved, The child should see that this is taking place, it's not good for a child to see a parent running away from problems, consider what they are being taught here.
Should parents without a degree teach homeschool? No, and graduates need to give this serious thought also.
Consider this. How many graduates would a homeschool situation need to effectively cover the national curriculum, is the cost to advantage ratio justifiable?
To chose to homeschool in a specific discipline is a whole new question.
Learn more about this author, Keen Johns.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Should parents have a degree to home school their children? They didn't require one prior to the early 1900s even in public schools. Ironically, statistics show that children were better educated prior to legislation requiring credentials. Not only were children more literate and intelligent, they were also better behaved. All this guidance came from parents who often had no formal education of their own.
Current surveys of home schooled students tested using the same standardized formats administered to publicly educated students project results that can't be denied. Home school students outscore public schooled students by 30 to 37 points in EVERY subject area! (HSLDA, http://www.hslda.org ).
Furthermore, test scores for states where there are governmental regulations on home school requirements versus states where there are little to no regulations showed no differences. According to the HSLDA's website, all home schooled students, regardless of regulations (such as requiring parents to have a degree) obtained average scores in the 86th percentile considerably above national standards for publicly educated students.
The Future of Freedom Foundation's website, http://www.fff.org, states the following:
"Even the Secretary of Education has admitted in the frankest terms that the government education system is failing the American people so miserably that it threatens our very future as a nation."
With that said, how can anyone confidently claim that to have a college degree from a university influenced by these government regulations makes a parent a better educator? The Future of Freedom Foundation further addresses the issues by saying:
"Technology has now made compulsory attendance obsolete. One can now learn much more at home than in any public classroom at less cost to everyone Education has become a racket, not a profession The organized educators now have the political clout in Washington and the state capitals to get virtually anything they want from a bewildered public which have been told over and over again that the cause of educational failure is not bad teaching and a flawed educational philosophy but lack of financial support. And so, those who are truly interested in education have the double task of exposing the education racket for what it is, and informing the public and their fearless elected representatives of what is actually going on in public education."
And just what is going on in public education and the idea that all parents who home school should have those credentials? Systematic repression of free ideas, immoral education, and a philosophy that fits every human being to a single mold is threatening our freedoms as a nation.
A degree is not required to be a good home schooling parent. Only a desire to learn with your children and ability to research and retain information about anything you don't understand. The thirst for knowledge combined with the endless resources available in modern society, especially the internet, makes degrees a non-issue. Loving parents nurturing their children and providing accountable, upstanding, better mannered citizens to our society is irrefutable!
Learn more about this author, A.J. Morrison.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.