Join | Log in

Channel Button
Debate_icon

Education   >

Educational Philosophy

Get a Widget for this title

Low-performing schools: Does encouraging parents to play a more active role in their children's education take school boards and teachers off the hook?

Title endorsed in part by:

Results so far:

No
87% 212 votes Total: 243 votes
Yes
13% 31 votes
No

Does encouraging parents to play a more active role in their children's education take school boards and teachers off the hook?

In approaching the hot-button topic of teacher responsibility and parental involvement in education, it is fair to state that there are few greater responsibilities or higher callings than that of being a parent or a teacher. I would be hard-pressed to find a large number of people who would suggest that parental involvement in education is unimportant. Still, it is not uncommon to find parents struggling to maintain a healthy balance between work and family. All too often, we see empty chairs at parent-teacher conferences, or we find that notes home go unread and phone calls go unreturned. We realize that most parents care deeply about their child's education. The challenge is that as parents, we're often overextended.

On the other side of the spectrum, there are countless educators who also feel overwhelmed and helpless. Faced with the challenges of under-funded schools, unruly students, and limited support there are some teachers who fight everyday to provide students with a quality education. Every day is a struggle to do the right thing. Every class presents a new set of challenges. Many teachers learn "on the job", as our universities and colleges do not adequately prepare us for the multiple challenges presented in the classroom. In some unfortunate cases, this has led to apathy, defeatism, and even anger.

As both an educator and a parent, I would strongly suggest that the only way that we can move towards addressing some of the challenges surrounding our educational system is by re-engaging parents, family and educators in the process. We need all hands on deck. The educating of a child was never intended to fall solely on the shoulders of school boards and educators, or exclusively with parents. This is underscored in the fact that the earliest public schools were formed with the same basic goals of the family unit.

The earliest public schools, known as Common Schools, were created with the goal of forming good citizens, curbing crime and anti-social behavior, and addressing poverty. These shared goals were built into the fabric of society as a whole, and are still embraced today as a primary responsibility in parenting. In other words, the educating of our children has always been considered a realistic expectation for parents and guardians, not simply teachers. Still, placing the proper emphasis on parental involvement should not be viewed as replacing the responsibility that teachers and board members have, but complimenting it. In the same way that two wings are required to safely fly an aircraft, it takes equally committed parents and teachers to educate a child.

Another important point in this discussion is that more parent/teacher involvement and interaction would actually place a greater level of accountability on all involved. It is true that many of our educational issues can find their root cause in the breakdown of the family. Without delving into the details surrounding these alarming findings, it has been documented that student performance can be linked to socio-economic status, the presence of both parents within the nuclear family, environmental factors, and even the educational level of the parents. These studies seem to indicate that the more family-related challenges a student has, the more likely that student is to under-achieve academically and embrace anti-social behavior at school. I mention this not to devolve teachers and school boards of responsibility; rather I underscore these facts in order to highlight the interdependent nature of the family and the classroom. Still, it is fair to say that issues like these would lessen with the advent of a renewed focus on supporting and equipping parents to become engaged. In essence, parental involvement would help eliminate any potential excuses for poor teacher and administrator performance. It would also provide a platform for teachers to express their desires and concerns in constructive community with parents. With involved parents and teachers holding one another mutually accountable, the true beneficiaries would be our children. In reality, this type of partnership would actually increase, not alleviate the need for committed, engaged teachers and board members.

In conclusion, I submit that educating a child is a partnership that requires multiple stakeholders. These stakeholders share varying responsibilities in creating a society that is conducive to developing effective schools and successful students. It is fair to say that while the parent should be considered chief stakeholder in their child's overall well being, the parent does not stand-alone. When parents are advocating for their children it will create a "ripple effect" of accountability that will ultimately lead to more accountability on all levels. Ultimately, our society as a whole would benefit.

Learn more about this author, Tom Bradwell.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.

Yes

It's sad that parents have to be encouraged to take an active role in their children's education. Equally as sad is the fact that parents blame school boards and teachers when their children fail to receive an adequate education. As an educator, it is a sad state of affairs to see students enter college without even a basic education, some who were labeled as "honor students" by their respective high schools. Colleges and Universities across the country have been forced to teach remedial English and Math courses just to bring students up to par before they can enroll in the traditional freshman curriculum.

Parents seem to forget the education they received, or did not receive, while in school. If parents would evaluate what they missed as students, they could better prepare their children for the educational process. However, such is not the case. It's easier to place the blame elsewhere, but education begins at home. For the first five years of a child's life, he/she is exposed to a primary care taker. What parents teach their children during these first five years determines the quality of education received/gained. For example, a child entering school who cannot spell or write his/her name, does not know primary colors, cannot recognize basic shapes, and/or cannot read is at a disadvantage, and this is not the fault of the school board or the teacher; it is the parent's fault.

Parents should create an environment conducive to learning well before their children's school age years. One of the most important subjects taught in the school system, though taught incorrectly, is reading. If one cannot read, there is no reason to believe he/she can be successful in school. Unfortunately, the methods used to teach students to read is antiquated and ineffective. Students are taught to recognize words when they see them (through the use of the "sight word" method), and they are taught the proper way to pronounce words (through the "phonics" method). However, what is missing in these methods is the meaning of the word.

It's wonderful to be able to recognize a word and pronounce it properly, but if the meaning escapes the reader, comprehension is lost. Without comprehension, learning becomes a chore, causing many to become disgruntled with the learning process. If children are taught to read, their comprehension of all subjects increase dramatically. Unfortunately, it would require retraining of school teachers, and this is where school boards and teachers can be held responsible.

Ironical ly, the proper method for teaching the fundamentals of reading is being used in the school system, but it is used as a method to teach English as a second language. Consequently, parents can teach their children the proper way to read by introducing their children to prefixes, roots, and suffixes. These three components make up most of the English language. The beauty of it is the definition of respective prefixes, roots, and suffixes never change. Thus, when encountered in other words, the meaning can be detected by breaking the word into its various parts and assessing the meaning. For example, the word somnambulist is made up of the prefix "somn," the root "ambul," and the suffix "ist." When the word somnambulist is taken in as a whole, it may leave one to wonder what the word means. However, if the word is broken into its parts, the meaning becomes apparent. "Somn" = sleep; "ambul" = walk, and "ist" = person. Thus, the meaning of somnambulist is sleepwalker.

In addition to introducing children to the above, parents should introduce their children to the library. A library card is free to all who apply. It's amazing how few students visit the library outside of school, and parents rarely make the library a part of their children's educational resources.

What parents need to understand is education is a discovery process. To think that teachers can teach children all they need to know in order to be successful is ludicrous. Education is a continuous process that hinges on one's ability to comprehend the material and/or information being disbursed. "Reading is fundamental," and education begins at home.

Learn more about this author, Michelle Bush.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.

What is Helium? | Buy Web Content | Contact Us | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA | User Tools | Help | Community | Helium’s Official Blog | Link to Helium

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA