Results so far:
| Yes | 17% | 214 votes | Total: 1258 votes | |
| No | 83% | 1044 votes |
Should Fathers be able to Opt-out of Parenthood
Let's think about that for a moment, "Should fathers be able to opt out of parenthood?" It really depends on the situation. As a proponent of women's rights, and especially, women's reproductive rights, it only seems right to extend equal rights to the male in the equation. A woman knows when she is ready and willing to be a mother, and she is allowed to make that reproductive choice, and therefore men should also have the same right.
However, it really does depend on the situation. Today, we see too many young girls, who are not even mature enough to be considered a woman, and that have low self-esteem. They have been exposed to dysfunctional relationships in their own upbringing and home environments, and do not learn how to build stable relationships, causing them to constantly choose the wrong types of males to partner with. Sex becomes an act that they believe has to quickly commence with every new guy they meet, because their warped understanding of relationship is that sex equates to love. On the flip side of the equation, just as there are so many young girls who are growing up without the necessary knowledge on how to build a stable relationship, there are an equaling amount of young guys who do not have the knowledge either. It is the beginning of the new and next generation of dysfunctional relationships.
How often do we hear about young girls having babies because it fills a void, it gives them something to love, and they hope it will keep the guy they are with even though they have only known each other a few months? Unfortunately, these reasons are becoming all too trendy. Yes, they should be equally responsible for contraception, and when they fail to be respectful to each other in that sense, they find themselves in a situation known as pregnancy. If the two had taken the time to build a relationship, they may have found out that one or the other did not want to be a parent, and maybe it would have helped them refrain from sex or take better precautions. When it comes to parenting, the relationship needs to have both consenting members aware and ready of the responsibility. In other words, it takes committment, and if the two are not really committed to a relationship, how can either expect to fully commit to being the best parents they can be?
When a pregnancy occurs in this type of relationship, the girl has the right to do whatever she wants, reproductively speaking. The discussions about whether each wanted to be parents at any point in their lives never took place before conception did. But still, the female is in control. If she does not feel she is ready to be a mother or she does not ever want to be a mother, she can make the choice to give the pregnancy up for adoption or choose to have an abortion. Though, many young girls are jumping on the side of pro-life as a means to atone for being irresponsible sexually, as if being pro-life now makes the situation all better. The male in these types of relationships will either tough it out with a girl they hardly know, creating another generation of dysfunction, or they will become a child support paycheck, who is often void in the child's life; and she will become angry and bitter at the fact that she could not force parenthood on him and cannot understand why he does not want to be involved.
There are also relationships, ones that even include marriage, where the male is totally absent when it comes to being a parent. More often than not, it is not healthy for a child to feel unloved, unwanted, and not nurtured. We know now that it is not only the female who is the nurturer, but that the male has an abundance of nurturing to carry out in order to give a child a wealth of stability and security. By forcing a male to be a father when he is unwilling, it makes for resentment and it does not make them a quality parent. Just like you cannot force a woman to be and feel maternal, why do we believe a man should own up and be paternal? Biology does not make people automatically good at parenting, and all one has to do is turn on the news or pick up a newspaper to see proof of this. We have mothers that abuse and kill their children, we have fathers who abuse and kill children, making it evident that not everyone should be allowed to be a parent.
Now, if the circumstance is one where there has been a committed relationship that extends out for a few years and there are already children born, it is a bit different. The father should be financially responsible for the children, and it would be great if he could still be involved and an intricate part of their upbringing. But, if they were not very involved before the relationship failed, what makes a woman believe they will be involved after the relationship is over? Again though, it is not beneficial to try and force a father to be a father, because the child will feel the lack of interest and warmth and this will be unhealthy for the child. A child is better off without an ingenuine and forced relationship with their father.
So yes, a male should be able to opt out of parenthood. Being a quality parent is not something that can be forced, and it most definitely has to be a desire. Maybe if men were given the same right as women to opt out of parenthood, girls and women would enter into sexual relationships cautiously, taking the time to really know the person they are with before they become intimate. It might force females to have the real conversations and ask the hard questions like, "Do you want to have kids and when do you see yourself being a parent", instead of finding out the hard way when they bail. Face it, parenthood is not something that can be forced.
Learn more about this author, Jan Castagnaro.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
In a society obsessed with "freedom of choice" that also battles with the results of generations that lack responsibility, it is shocking that fathers aren't able to "opt out" of paternity. I do not believe that they should have the right to take an easier road just because they want to, after creating a baby. Then again, I feel the same way with women; there's really no choice in the matter for either party, or at least, there shouldn't be any type of "opt out" options. As long as each party had made the decision to engage in intercourse, a consequential pregnancy should suffer being put up to a debate.
Granted, the question posed did not ask anything about abortion, but it is not fair to examine a father's options without looking at what the woman's options are. So, to think through the subject thoroughly, one MUST look into the controversial matter of abortion as well. Women reading this should first stop and think of how they would feel with an unexpected pregnancy. Even if your beliefs are against abortion, a lot of women do consider it even if only secretly and very briefly. Why? It's called "fear" and it is normal for a woman to feel fear in this situation. Why is it that it's okay for women to fear and want to flee but it makes a man look down right criminal for even entertaining the idea? Men fear just like women do.
When dealing with any fear, the best thing to do is not run from it, but to examine it and try to work through it. It doesn't make sense for either parent to "opt out" or even terminate a pregnancy as a knee- jerk reaction. Not everyone wants to have children and sometimes the timing of an unexpected pregnancy can bring lots of havic to your life, but there are countless resources available so most parents are able to cope with and grow to enjoy the changes taking place in their lives. This does not happen for every woman or every man, but most people do change over the course of a pregnancy.
Most of the inconvenient things that come along with pregnancy and parenthood are rested on the mother's shoulders. Even in modern day, that is still the general rule with exception. The female body goes through an internal war and some of those battle scars show on the outside, (stretch marks), and no women welcome all those changes. However, as perceptions change over nine months, most women find that the pride and love they find as a new mother is well worth the hell they have put their body through. These physical attributes of the pregnancies coupled with the majority of responsibility on the mother all play a role in why women have been given the option to terminate a pregnancy without the father having any say whatsoever.
Fathers do not even get a partial say in the matter either way, their lives hang in the balance while they wait to hear what the mother-to-be decides. Often, a mother will change her mind a number of times, sending the father into a tight-rope balancing act with the other aspects of his life and finances. If the father does not stay with the mother, a pregnancy can also be used viciously as leverage over his head. There is a difference between staying with the mother and leaving her but not the child. Since the Child Support Laws have been reformed to make it easier for mothers to collect, it is time to rethink the visitation that is all too easily held from these men without recourse.
All in all, having these "opt outs" on EITHER side can and will be unfair. Our legal system is already bogged down and adding more and more cases that can be created from having any procreative options just would bring down the courthouse entirely. Having options make either the mother suffer or the father suffer in most cases, but aside from the parents- to- be, the person who suffers the worst is the unborn child. Sometimes, the best and fairest thing to do is consider who it is that will be impacted the greatest by your decisions, and then do what's best for that person.
Learn more about this author, Krissi Lyn Mazon.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.