Home > Politics, News & Issues > US Politics > US Elections
Results so far:
| Same old | 58% | 258 votes | Total: 444 votes | |
| New hope | 42% | 186 votes |
Same old
Created on: April 08, 2008 Last Updated: March 18, 2010
When current President Barack Obama was in the Senate, he voted with his party 97% of the times that he deigned to vote in a congressional session. This doesn't include the fact that he was absent for nearly 40% of the votes during the congressional session he should last have been a part of. Does this sound like he has new ideas and is the candidate for change? Nope, sorry. Obama's ideas are simply old Democratic ideas that hearken back to FDR's New Deal and Lyndon Johnson's massive expansion of government.
Let's start with government programs. Obama wants a federally funded health care system that he doesn't call universal, but will theoretically lower the cost of health care across the country. Again, this would be a federally administered program. Remember those last three words.
Obama is also totally fine with a governmentally controlled economy, as evidenced by government buyouts of GM and several banks, but, like the rest of the Democratic party, doesn't seem to get the point. He voted no on reducing overall federal spending by $40 billion, and doesn't seem to care about paying down federal debt, despite his bluster.
He wants to expand governmental oversight of credit cards, mortgage lending and more. These are more federally administered programs. And what does the Democratic party like to do? Expand governmental control over much of the economy and Americans' lives. And why do they want to do this? Because, to paraphrase Mr. Obama, "Government has to go to bat for the little guy."
Another area in which Senator Obama says he is the voice of change is that he doesn't agree with former President Bush's policies for Iraq, the economy, health care and everything else. the man should take a number and then move past it. Truth is, during the campaign, much of what Obama had to say that sounded different was simply a disagreement with the Republican stance on things.
Is that a voice of hope and change or simply a generic liberal way to go about things? It sounds a lot like Obama is trying to capitalize on his young looks and relatively fresh start in politics to manipulate people into thinking he has new ideas.
What new ideas? Have we actually heard any or do we keep simply hearing he's going to change Washington? And, with hindsight as our guide, how could this country have actually wanted the change that a guy who'd been in Congress for four years would bring? Four years seems a bit short in such a complex world, doesn't it? At this point, there has been no change in Washington.
No, wait, that's wrong. For an independent like this writer, what's going on in Washington DC is appalling. Federal spending increasing at a faster rate than in FDR's era, cronyism running rampant as Obama and his people fill spots with old colleagues from the fundamentally corrupt Chicago political machine- it's all very bad. There is change, really, but it's not the kind of change this country needs.
So is it time for new hope with Obama? Are his 'new' ideas really going to take the country in a new direction? Not likely. Funnily enough, the only viable candidate for president who had not completely toed the party line was McCain, which might explain why he ended up as the nominee.
Mr. Obama, please pack up your fundamental change and read the Constitution.
Learn more about this author, Jared Garrett.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
New hope
Created on: February 28, 2008 Last Updated: May 02, 2012
Barack Obama's oratory delivers a new message of hope that is sweeping the country in words that inspire and encourage a troubled nation to look inside itself and rediscover its promise and relevance in the new global community. His message of hope is far more than old democratic ideas presented in a new package. Much more. They are substantiative ideas that are nothing less than a call for Americans to embrace the new world order that others have tried, and failed to summon.
A sea change of ideas was the phrase used by Hilary Clinton to describe the promise and the future of this great nation when the Democrats, flush with renewed spirit and disciples, assume the reigns of power in 2009. A sea change is something that the survivors of an approaching hurricane can well attest to. A sea change proceeds a storm surge just before the most powerful natural force on Earth wends it way into the lives of millions. Hilary Clinton foretells the coming change, because she recognizes the power of the Obama American movement.
But there's more than just comparing Obama to an approaching hurricane to this story. There's the reality of the reality we have to face if someone other than Obama is empowered by the nation's electorate. The past eight years have been a disaster for our nation. It's not just the invasion of a sovereign nation in the middle-east; it's the mindset of the Republican leadership that verges on the imperialism, self-righteousness and undeniable power. It's a corruption of our system of American government and the principles of freedom and democracy framed by the Constitution's creators at its worst.
There is a message for us from Hollywood, of all places, delivered subtly in the movie No Country for Old Men. The message is simply that in this new world, we share responsibility for finding solutions to the problems that seem insurmountable. Problems like drugs, immigration, the war, health care, and too many more to list here. These are problems for which it has become increasingly obvious that old style thinking produces old solutions by that don't work.
We can thank the old republican regimes, Bush and Cheney and their staunch sycophants for being tanked by the think tanks. Of course, they've taken us along for the ride because we're just ignorant folk that will believe anything if you scare us enough. But Americans, like Hilary Clinton, have found their voice and recaptured their vision, one that's been absent for decades, lost in the turbulent times since Robert Kennedy was mercilessly slaughtered.
As a wealthy multicultural nation we have two things in common. The timed that we live in and the earth that we share. Our earth is verging on environmental collapse, thanks to decades of denial and scoffing about the impact of global warming. Our time is marked by the end of the millennium and the rise of globalism. Our nation's power doesn't quite seem so powerful when it can easily defeat armies, but not tribalism and religious fanaticism.
Preservin g the old industrialist view of exploitation of resources for profit has made the wealthy powerful and blind. We need a form of environmental capitalism to work our way out of this mess and the old industrialist regime, possibly led by John McCain, would rather wage war in a distant land. Much more than that, we need new ideas and positive leadership in order to guide our nation's ship of state through the storm that engulfed us while we slept.
Learn more about this author, Francis Jock.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.