Home > Politics, News & Issues > US Law & Justice > Police & Prisons
Results so far:
| No | 84% | 843 votes | Total: 1003 votes | |
| Yes | 16% | 160 votes |
No
Created on: April 29, 2009 Last Updated: May 16, 2009
The word penitentiary originates from the Pennsylvania Quakers' belief in penitence and self-examination as a way of achieving salvation. The first American penitentiary was the Walnut Street Jail, established in Philadelphia in 1790. The structural pattern of outside cells, along with the central corridor, was introduced at Walnut Street Jail and soon became the major architectural feature of prison construction. Walnut Street Jail was also the place where solitary confinement was permanently established as a method of combating crime.
The new prison system operated on the principles of reform. Prisoners were segregated according to age, sex, and the type of offense committed. More than 200 years ago, this innovative method of reform was put into place. Since then, we have built hundreds of prisons. And we have filled those prisons more quickly than we can build them. In the U.S., our rate of repeat offenders is so high that we could easily place revolving doors at the front of our prisons. Our technology has advanced at lightning speed. Our methods of rehabilitation have not.
Does prison reform work? We need look no further than a few statistics to know the answer is absolutely not. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, of the 272,111 inmates released from prisons in 15 states in 1994, an estimated 67.5% were re-arrested within 3 years.
Prison reform has truly become an oxymoron. Most prisons are a place of brutality. Inmates live in a world of violence. The first-time petty criminals and drug addicts are tossed in with the hard-core murderers and rapists. Whether or not they were violent to begin with, they must become violent to survive. How can we expect reform given these conditions?
A 1996 Human Rights Watch report titled No Escape: Male Rape in U.S. Prisons, contains a multitude of quotes from inmates. Read only a few and you get a clear view of the ugliness inside a prison. Here are two examples:
I found out how people earn respect in here, you have to beat someone or shank them.
J.G., Minnesota, 9/12/96
Most of the prisoners who rape are spending from 5 to life. And are part of a gang. They pick a loner smaller weaker individual. And make that person into a homosexual then sell him to other inmates or gangs. Anywhere from a pack of cigarettes to 2 cartons . . . . No one cares about you or anyone else. If they show kindness or are trying to be helpful, it is only because they want something. And if they're offering you protection you can guarantee that they're going to seek sexual favors. . . . When an inmate comes in for the first time and doesn't know anyone. The clicks and gangs. Watch him like Wolves readying they're attacks. They see if he spends time alone, who he eats with. Its like the Wild Kingdom. Then they start playing with him, checking the new guy out. (They call him fresh meat.)
J.G., Minnesota, 8/8/96
Rape, abuse, gang associations, fear, and rivalry are the way of life in prisons. These situations are not new, nor are they any more controlled now than a decade or two ago. In this sense, prison life only grows worse as overcrowding forces the inmates into tightly confined areas.
Inmates certainly should not be given private rooms, HDTV in their cells, and filet mignon on their plates. No one believes a prisoner should be treated like a guest at a fancy hotel. However, we must face reality. When we treat inmates like rabid animals, that is what they will become.
Learn more about this author, Darcia Helle.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Yes
Created on: February 21, 2008
As a psychologist at a prison, I could have written from either view point as to whether or not prison reforms criminals. Compared to the past, a great deal more is done to help reform criminals to prevent future re-offending. In the past, criminals were simply locked up and kept away from society until they did their time, then released back into the big wide world, without a single bit of help or intervention along the way. These days things are very different.
Working in a prison has opened my eyes to a great deal. Of course there are aspects that I find extremely frustrating which I believe should be done better. In many ways, much more should be done to help rehabilitate and reform criminals, but there is only so much money available to fund these resources and it is not an area that many pro-social citizens what their tax going towards. However, in saying that, there is a lot that is done.
There are certain offenders within the prison system who will not rehabilitate. Some individuals have deep ingrained problems or psychopathies that will prevent them from ever understanding the wrong they have committed. This is especially true for sex offenders, who do not seem to get a great deal from prison. That is also a big reason why their chances of getting parole can sometimes be a lot more difficult than a murderer, and often their release is still conditional, with supervision and frequent reporting.
Some individuals benefit greatly from the available help that is offered within the prsion. There are numerous behavioural programs on offer here in Australia, ranging from substance abuse, violence, sex offences and just general offending. These programs offer an alternative viewpoint to the offence and help the individual to identify alternatives to their actions and develop insight into their own behaviour. These programs can be beneficial, but it all just depends on who they are working with.
Many of these programs are compulsary for offenders serving a period of over twelve months. For this reason, eagerness to participate can be low, but there are programs also available on a voluntary basis and these programs are very successful. Many individuals will speak of the benefits they have gotten from these particular programs and the skills they have learnt.
However there are negatives involved in these programs as well. For starters, the statistics reveal that offenders who are either an extremely high risk or a low risk do not benefit from the programs. It can infact work in the opposite manner. They are instead designed to moderate to high risk offenders. Also, the biggest complaint of all I personally have is that many of the specialised offending programs, particuarly violence and sexual offending, are not actually completed until the offender is towards the end of their sentence. This means they are living their day to day prison life for 10, 15, even 20 years before their criminogenic needs are addressed. It makes it far more challenging to change a person's way of thinking if it is left this late, however again, the statistics seem to support this method.
Overall, prisons can do a great deal to reform a criminal. This is especially the case for first time offenders who have committed something that might not even seem too severe, like repeated traffic offences. Generally that loss of freedom is enough to scare many of them from making the same mistake again. And for those individuals who want to change, there are certainly the available facilities to do so. It all depends on the individual and their willingness to change. However, as the saying goes at our work 'Every interaction is a chance to initiate change'.
Learn more about this author, Holly Rogers.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.