Search Helium

Home > Politics, News & Issues > Sports News & Opinion > Sports News & Opinion (Other)

Are professional athletes overpaid?

Results so far:

No
38% 2152 votes Total: 5709 votes
Yes
62% 3557 votes

No

by Andy Aitkens

Created on: January 02, 2008   Last Updated: October 31, 2008

Imagine that you work hard all day, for almost every day in the year. Constantly training, constantly traveling. After all of these physical and emotional tolls you and your body has endured, your paycheck has been reduced because society felt it was not proper to give you the full salary you deserve. You are responsible for generating this money, why should someone else have the rights to it? It has been said that what one top professional American athlete makes in one year could feed a small country for a year. Take LeBron James, for example. He makes more than $20 million per year, and he's not alone. On average, the top 25 NBA players make $14.44 million per year. Many people are very upset by the fact that athletes make so much money. They shouldn't be. These athletes deserve every penny they make.

Supply & Demand: It's a business. America is built on capitalism.

They are entertainment and sports is one of America's favorite past times. Americans spend many hours of their life viewing sporting events. These athletes are cut from a special cloth. The entire NBA league is made up of only about 492 players. We race to buy the clothing, the latest jerseys, shoes, etc. The supply is limited. It's really only the starters who are making the big bucks. Someone like Chris McCray, for example (who plays second string for the Milwaukee Bucks), according to hoopshype makes "only" $146,744 per year, far less than other professions.

They work hard for their money. Constantly training, constantly traveling on long road trips that take them away from friends and family, signing autographs and doing endorsements when they're not on the court. They entire life IS their job. Few occupations in the world demand so much.

They put their bodies at risk and their earning potential is actually restricted by the fact that their careers are so short. The average professional athlete's career in football, for example, is only 3.8 years. After that time, in the vast majority of cases, his life is riddled with pain and physical problems that he must endure for the rest of his life. Joe Namath, Joe Montana, are prime examples. The St. Paul Pioneer Press quoted Sprewell as saying, "Why would I want to help them win a title? They're not doing anything for me. I've got a lot at risk here. I've got my family to feed"

When you think about all of the money they generated through commercials, sportswear, tickets, endorsements, the final question remains. If not the athletes, who should get this money? Many people may say to donate it, although this does seem like a good alternative, athletes would lose the drive to perform and less viewers would tune in every Friday night to see the less exciting game. They work hard for it, how can we as a society say that their profession is overpaid. Many other professions also generate a substantial sum of money; we do not ask them to donate it, much less talk about how they don't deserve it.

What other business or product manages to accomplish all of the above positive role models for youth, an industry that generates thousands upon thousands of jobs and brings in significant revenue to cities, states and local economies;, offers some of the best entertainment Americans could ever hope to have? As if this wasnt enough, takes an endless toll on your body for the rest of your life. They deserve every cent they make. And as LeTrelle Spreewell stated, the money is critical. After all, he has to feed his family.

Learn more about this author, Andy Aitkens.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.

Yes

by Barbara Stanley

Created on: April 17, 2009

It has often been noted that nothing costs more than the market will bear, else the product or service will languish until it exists no more. The price of a ticket to attend a professional athletic event continues to increase and the market apparently is willing to bear it. At least, until recent difficult economic times. I believe there will be a marked decrease in ticket sales due to an uncertain job market and a shift in priorities. Presently, athletes enjoy millionaire status because they can demand a percentage of the ticket sales, especially those considered the stars of the team. Are they overpaid? They are in my opinion, but I base my opinion on comparison of knowledge, talent, skills, and necessity.

How much knowledge is required to play the sport? Although most professional athletes graduated from a four-year college, it did not take them four years to learn how to play football, baseball, hockey, or basketball. Much of their time is spent in practice and on the road playing away games, which leaves little time to study and become proficient in knowledge needed to pursue another career should they not become professional athletes.

How much talent does it take to play these sports? The majority of the players on a team are backup for those with exceptional talents. This means that, with much practice, almost anyone could be a professional athlete as long as their health was very good and they had the strength to endure long, hard practice sessions. Those who are billed as the stars of the teams were born with natural talents that were enhanced with practice.

How much skill does it take to be a professional athlete? Skill is the ability to perform an action with ease and confidence that comes with doing the action over and over until it becomes second nature or a habit. Skill is earned by hard work, patience, and perseverance. Do all professional athletes qualify as skillful? Probably not. I am sure there are many who do qualify.

The last is the most important. Are professional athletes a necessity? Of course not. No one will die tomorrow if all professional sports were banned and all athletes were out of a job. They do not, as a team, save lives by running into a burning building, yet the people who do are not paid enough to survive on. They do not treat disease, illnesses, or other health issues, nor do they operate on hearts, treat cancer, or mental illness. Doctors have to repay student loans for years before they earn enough money to live comfortably. Their mal-practice insurance is almost unaffordable. They are certainly not paid what they are worth.

I could list many professions in which the person is responsible for another person's life. EMTs and Paramedics are first on the scene of accidents and, as such, are often the only thing between the victim and death. They are paid just over minimum wage. In each of the cases mentioned, the person is not paid what they are worth to us as a society and to us as individuals. There are many other professions that we can say the same about. In comparison, is the athlete worth more money than a surgeon? Is he worth more than a teacher? The answer is no, of course, but we pay the excessive amount charged by the team owners. Because the owners receive hundreds of millions of dollars each year, they are compelled to pay their players a large sum of money to retain them. The athlete has the power to demand and the funds available. Our public servants have no such power or available funds from which demands could be met.

Until our priorities change, and people stop paying ridiculus prices for sporting events, athletes will continue to be over-paid to entertainers.

Learn more about this author, Barbara Stanley.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.


CONNECT WITH US

Read
our blog
Helum for writers

Write and get published
Share with other writers
Polish your freelancing skills

Join our active writing community
Helium Content Source for Publishers

Quality articles from proven freelancers
Exclusive rights, fast turnaround
Brand engagement, business blogging -- our writers do it all

Get custom content today!

INFORMATION


Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA