Title endorsed in part by:
Results so far:
| Help | 71% | 343 votes | Total: 486 votes | |
| Hurt | 29% | 143 votes |
I've spent the past few years actively involved in helping to turn my own local shelters into no-kill shelters, so I feel that I am 'almost' an expert in this field, and I will add my own emphatic, and resounding YES...they do help!
My County is mentioned several times in Nathan Winograd's book "Redemption", {The Myth of Pet Overpopulation and the No Kill Revolution in America}, and the prognosis for our county animal-control was grim at best, with our Humane Society coming in a close second.
Nathan had been hired to make an assessment of animal-control, as well as hold a seminar to introduce the concept of no-kill to this community.
The number one problem area he discovered, is probably THE most vital element of a true no-kill shelter, and this problem was, that we lacked the hard working and compassionate director/staff to pull us into this new progressive mind-set of the 21st century, that helps to reduce the numbers of sheltered animals...but in a compassionate way.
Adhering to Traditional sheltering practices (adopting a few...kill the rest)appears to be the most popular choice for lowering the large population of homeless and abandoned animals, but in doing that...our own shelters are numbered among the thousands of shelters across the Nation that kill millions of animals every year. That is what we had here (notice the key-word...'had' ).
This accepted concept of "Adopt a few...kill the rest" has been the status-quo for generations, and in fact, is an attitude that is aggressively backed by the HSUS as well as PETA.
That just doesn't float-my-boat, and many other persons of conscience are also realizing that with the proper combination of programs and procedures in place...ie. "The No Kill Equation", we can dramatically lower the number of shelter intakes as well as drive-up the number of adoptions, in a loving and compassionate way..
No-kill shelters have the only proven way of pulling all the elements together to do this successfully, and yet, the movement in this direction has been criticized, ridiculed and fought against since it's inception. I have to ask myself "why"? And then I realize...change is difficult and often comes with a battle.
I've done intensive research, and am not embarrassed to say that I am some-what of a Nathan Winograd-groupie...a nd consider him among just a small handful of sincere people who are actually making a difference in the way our sheltered animals are treated.
Our leading National Animal Protection Organizations, while raking in the big money, don't even come close to the mind-set that a "shelter" is exactly that...a "shelter/refuge" for our homeless ones.
The Communities that have embraced the "No Kill Philosophy" in totality and incorporated the "No Kill Equation" into their programs-and-procedu res shelter-manuals...wi thout a doubt, are seeing a dramatic lowering of the numbers of unwanted, abandoned (and killed) animals anywhere from over-night, to the span of a few years.
A No Kill shelter can be private or public, limited or open-admission.
The true no-kill shelter is one that doesn't kill healthy or treatable dogs and cats. They offer education and support for feral cats care-givers as well.
Hearing this, many would think that soon, there will be cats and dogs falling from the sky (perhaps that's why the HSUS sends out so many umbrellas...I would also like to take this opportunity to thank them for all the address labels...I have papered my entire house with them).
There is still a small percentage (usually ranging from 5-10% of animals entering these shelters that are irremediably suffering or too temperamentally unpredictable (vicious) to rehabilitate...depen ding on your own communitie's resources. Some communities have endless resources, others are struggling.
The five to six million animals being killed in traditional shelters are seeing this dramatic reduction with the help of conscientious people who are sick of the killing and believe there is a better way. I am one of those people. Killing innocent animals matters to me, and I can say, with-out a doubt, that the No Kill Movement has made an enormous impact on how we look at the way we treat our shelter-animals.
I personally believe there is the right person for every animal out there, and it's just a matter of taking a pro-active approach to hooking them up together. This may take time, but it pays off knowing he won't be a return customer every other week.
In no-kill shelters, each animal is treated on his own merits, and help is being offered in every area from behavioral to medical rehabilitation, to fostering (for the needier guys, or those who need time to recover from surgery, new moms who are still nursing pups or kittens ((the ones we didn't catch soon enough))...everythin g is done, to either keep the animal with his guardian, or to find her a better situation.
These foster-animals are either returned to the shelter when the time is right, they might be on-line or records kept in a folder for prospective adopters.
I want to point-out at this time, that even though spay and neuter is a HUGE, possibly the largest cornerstone in any and every no-kill shelter/community, the efforts to buy these dogs and cats a one-way ticket into a new for-ever home, go far beyond sterilization.
Every animal, of course, is spayed or neutered before adoption..and often shelters gain enough support from the community to expand the high-volume, low-cost spay/neuter programs, but the director of a No-Kill shelter can either make-it or break-it.
He/She needs to be driven by compassion and hard-work. The staff will follow or leave. There are many people out there looking for work, who love animals and are even volunteering their time, so finding replacements for an un-caring staff is not a problem.
Through broad media coverage, (a vital element of alerting the public to what the shelter needs)it's no longer possible to turn a blind-eye to the kitty who was rescued from a fire, trying to save the lives of her babies. It's no longer acceptable to allow your pet to have just that 'one' litter so that your children can see the 'miracle of life'. And it is absolutely unforgivable to run a puppy-mill or dog-fighting operation.
Media is vital to no-kill and often offered free. Many animals will find homes, or be spayed and neutered due to media attention.
One way of controlling our 'overpopulation of dogs and cats' is to kill them all. This is actually one approach suggested by both PETA and the HSUS on many occasions, and just recently, while considering what the final disposition of the Michael Vick dogs might be. Luckily, there were conscientious Rescues and no-kill shelters that were willing to take on the responsibility of these dogs, and give them a second chance at a better life. The pictures I've seen of these rescued dogs are priceless.
To punish the helpless 'victims' of a crime (by death) is unheard of to me.
Why is it that our largest and wealthiest National Animal Protection Agencies...HSUS and PETA, to name only two, are so against "No Kill", and go so far as to send out propaganda that backs-up the 'Draconian' killing, to our shelters all over the country?
These two organizations, which reap in huge amounts of donation money are doing very little to protect shelter-animals. Quite the contrary. They are fighting to keep things at status-quo... where a few animals are adopted-out, and the rest are killed. They seem to think it's just fine to 'kill' the 'overpopulation'.
The HSUS has even gone so far as to send representatives to any community who is actively engaged in changing this traditional way of catch-and-kill sheltering, to a more compassionate and comprehensive way of reducing the population of off-spring, while treating the shelter-animals with a bit of dignity and love.
The No Kill Movement is a revolutionary movement of consciousness, that no longer accepts killing as a form of 'population control'.
No-kill shelters offer many programs to reduce the numbers of unwanted and abandoned animals:
*Comprehensi ve TNR (Trap, Neuter, Return) programs for feral cats (as mentioned above).
Feral cats have traditionally been considered a nuisance to many, and even with care-takers, as well as many of us speaking on their behalf...it's an on-going battle (thank-you HSUS).
The traditional way of dealing with these cats is to round them up...take them to the local shelter and kill them. These cats may be the off-spring, one generation removed from 'fluffy' who is sitting on your lap right now.
TNR offers a compassionate way of reducing the growing numbers of these colonies over a period of a few years. It's amazing...trust me.
We can't just call our-selves a no-kill shelter and quit killing without having many programs set and ready to go...
Each shelter will have needs tailored just to them-selves, but here are a few general programs I didn't mention above, for all shelters when following the "No Kill Equation";
*Off-site adoption venues are priceless. Just today there were three wonderful Pit-mixes adopted out at Petsmart, who might have been over-looked at the shelter.
*Foster program for cats and dogs...even the temperamental rascals.
*An army of volunteers are no longer afraid of the shelter...win/win.
*V et techs and Behaviorists who offer their time pro-bona.
*Pet-retent ion program. Someone available to help guardians with their own animals problems, before considering relinquishing them.
*Having a good working-relationship with local and breed-specific rescues.
*Great public relations (MEDIA)
For a much clearer idea of this revolutionary movement to lower numbers, compassionately, you can google nokilladvocacycenter .com. There is much information offered that can help each of us take a closer look at what is really going on, and how we can all be a part of making this long over-due change.
I want to end this with a short quote by Martin Luther King Jr.
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter".
I will never be silent as long as innocent animals are being killed needlessly.
No-kill shelters are definitely my top-pick for lowering the numbers of unwanted and abandoned dogs and cats...compassionate ly.
Learn more about this author, Robin Loving.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
In an ideal world there would be no need to kill healthy pet-quality animals. A shelter set up for the re-homing of animals would have an equal number of animals brought in and adopted out. There would be perfect turnover with no animal staying more than a short stay till its new family arrived to welcome it home.
We have not yet achieved ideal world status.
This issue is complicated by a number of factors so the answers can also be complicated. I was manager and cruelty agent for a large shelter with staggering euthanasia rates. I have also worked at a cat shelter that was no-kill. These shelters may or may not have been representative of all shelters nation-wide but I feel qualified to make some comparisons based on my experience.
To give you a feel for the enormity of the problem a shelter faces I would like to share a typical day at the kill shelter. It is a local county shelter (though funded only through donations) that has the policy of accepting every animal brought through the door including strays brought in by dog catchers and the police. On an average summer day 60 cats and kittens are surrendered. The building has the capacity to hold a total of 40 cats. The cat room is full at the start of the day. We do a fantastic job of adopting out 25 neutered and vaccinated cats that day. Tomorrow we may get in only 40 new cats. One day (it was a record) we received 80. The numbers during "kitten season" are staggering.
Simple math will tell you there is an immediate problem. I find myself in the disgusting position of walking through the cat room to pick out which type of kitten will be euthanized today. There are too many brown tigers that have been here for over 24 hours now so they must go. The adult cats have no chance at more than 24 hours. No one wants them with so many kittens around.
As I go to the euthanasia room with my perfectly formed fuzzy eight week old kittens who were unfortunate enough to be a common color that day, the words of a woman run through my mind. She did not appreciate the education she received at the front desk about the importance of spaying her mother cat as she turned over the kittens to us. She self-righteously proclaimed that her children need to witness the miracle of birth. As I draw the deadly fluid into the syringe I wish I could share with her the miracle of death. I finish off my day by tossing 30 or 40 limp furry bodies into the crematorium. I am nauseated and have a headache.
A no-kill shelter must be the answer.
Years later I volunteer in a private no-kill shelter that houses a total of 200 cats. They live in rooms, not cages, so they have fairly good social interaction. Because I am an experienced animal person they place me in the special needs room. Basically these cats are not adoptable because they are too old and have a variety of diseases. There is also an FIV room and and FeLV room, also not adoptable. This accounts for more than half of the cats. The atmosphere is much more pleasant than my previous employment. I actually get to know the animals by name. I can play with them when I'm done cleaning.
I am not involved with adoptions as this is done by appointment-only through the management. After awhile I begin to notice that we get in very few new cats and there are very few leaving. A sign, "not currently accepting new cats," hangs on the front door for the entire 2 years I am there. Upon inquiry I discover the adoption rate is 4 cats per MONTH.
This shelter is a nice second choice for these cats to live in if they can't have homes. But this shelter is not serving the community at all. They spend much time and effort running fund raisers to raise money and supplies. It would be interesting to do a study on what percent of the funds go to support the non-adoptable cats (in the form of vet bills and medicines). I do not know the answer to this but my guess would be most of it.
When these two scenarios are juxtaposed the complicated nature of the problem becomes obvious. Either a shelter can actually accept all the extra animals in the community and kill many of them. Or a shelter can give a comparative few a reasonable home till they are adopted or pass away of old age, and do nothing for the rest of the animals that don't make it through the door before there is no more room.
My first thought is that neither hurts the other- they are just two different missions, two different functions. But then I think about those fund-raising dollars. Both shelters are non-profit and are 100% reliant on donations. Imagine this: there are 2 shelters in town. One kills and the other does not. Who gets the most community donations? The one with the warm fuzzy stories or the one that is actually dealing with the over-population problem with a horrific but necessary solution?
I think the warm-fuzzies win and that hurts the work of the true heroes.
Learn more about this author, Abagael MacAskill.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.